Citizens United Policy Recommendations - Revision history

Melanieb at 22:24, January 3, 2012

2012-01-03T22:24:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, January 3, 2012
Line 78:		Line 78:
	*"Supreme Court To Release Audio of Arguments in Citizens United To Media And National Archives" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/09/09/supreme-court-to-release-audio-of-arguments-in-citizens-united-to-media-and-national-archives/ 9/9/2009])		*"Supreme Court To Release Audio of Arguments in Citizens United To Media And National Archives" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/09/09/supreme-court-to-release-audio-of-arguments-in-citizens-united-to-media-and-national-archives/ 9/9/2009])

−	== Sunlight Resources and Projects ==	+	== Sunlight Resources and Projects ==

−	*[http://sunlightcam.com/ Campaign Ad Monitor]	+	*[http://sunlightcam.com/ Campaign Ad Monitor]
−	*[http://reporting.sunlightfoundation.com/outside-spending/ Follow the Unlimited Money]	+	*[http://reporting.sunlightfoundation.com/outside-spending/ Follow the Unlimited Money]
−	*[http://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/documents/hidden-money-2010-elections/ Hidden Money in the 2010 Elections: A pre-election primer on recent and recently exploited avenues for secretly funding elections]	+	*[http://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/documents/hidden-money-2010-elections/ Hidden Money in the 2010 Elections: A pre-election primer on recent and recently exploited avenues for secretly funding elections]
	*[http://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/documents/comprehensive-disclosure-regime-wake-supreme-court/ A Comprehensive Disclosure Regime in the Wake of the Supreme Court's Decision in Citizen's United v. Federal Election Commission]		*[http://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/documents/comprehensive-disclosure-regime-wake-supreme-court/ A Comprehensive Disclosure Regime in the Wake of the Supreme Court's Decision in Citizen's United v. Federal Election Commission]
		+
		+	== Resources on the DISCLOSE Act ==
		+
		+	*[http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.111s3295 S. 3295] DISCLOSE Act. Introduced 4/30/2010 by Sen. Schumer
		+	*[http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.111hr5175 H.R. 1575] DISCLOSE Act. Introduced 4/29/2010 by Rep. Van Hollen
		+	*Full Disclosure: The dramatic turn away from campaign transparency - Norm Ornstein ([http://www.tnr.com/node/88005 5/7/2011])<br>
		+	*Sen. Schumer's Press Release ([http://schumer.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=324343 4/29/2010])
		+	*DISCLOSE Act: House passes major campaign finance legislation - Huffington Post ([http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/24/disclose-act-house-passes_n_624698.html 6/24/2010])
		+	*Bill on political ad disclosures falls a little short in Senate - Washington Post ([http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/27/AR2010072704656.html 7/28/2010])

	= Legislation Introduced in Response to Citizens United <br> =		= Legislation Introduced in Response to Citizens United <br> =

Melanieb at 22:08, January 3, 2012

2012-01-03T22:08:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, January 3, 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	= Sunlight Action Around Citizen United =		= Sunlight Action Around Citizen United =

−	== Sunlight Blog Posts ==	+	== Sunlight Blog Posts ==

	*"FCC Poised to Take the Lead on Political Advertising Transparency" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/10/27/fcc-poised-to-take-the-lead-on-political-advertising-transparency/ 10/27/2011])		*"FCC Poised to Take the Lead on Political Advertising Transparency" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/10/27/fcc-poised-to-take-the-lead-on-political-advertising-transparency/ 10/27/2011])
Line 73:		Line 73:
	*"A New Regime Required For Disclosure" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/29/a-new-regime-required-for-disclosure/ 1/29/2010])		*"A New Regime Required For Disclosure" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/29/a-new-regime-required-for-disclosure/ 1/29/2010])
	*"President Obama on Influence Peddling" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/24/president-obama-on-influence-peddling/ 1/24/2010])		*"President Obama on Influence Peddling" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/24/president-obama-on-influence-peddling/ 1/24/2010])
−	*"Citizens United and Transparency: A Look Ahead" (http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/21/citizens_united_transparenc/ 1/21/2010])	+	*"Citizens United and Transparency: A Look Ahead" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/21/citizens_united_transparenc/ 1/21/2010])
	*"How the Citizens United Case Affects Money & Politics and Transparency As We Know it" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/21/how-the-citizens-united-case-affects-money-politics-and-transparency-as-we-know-it/ 1/21/2010])		*"How the Citizens United Case Affects Money & Politics and Transparency As We Know it" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/21/how-the-citizens-united-case-affects-money-politics-and-transparency-as-we-know-it/ 1/21/2010])
	*"Supreme Court Issues Major Campaign Finance Decision" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/21/supreme-court-issues-major-campaign-finance-decision/ 1/21/2010])		*"Supreme Court Issues Major Campaign Finance Decision" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/21/supreme-court-issues-major-campaign-finance-decision/ 1/21/2010])

Melanieb at 22:07, January 3, 2012

2012-01-03T22:07:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, January 3, 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*Ellen Miller's Senate testimony: http://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/documents/cu-testimony-ellen-s-miller/		*Ellen Miller's Senate testimony: http://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/documents/cu-testimony-ellen-s-miller/

−	== Sunlight ~~Blogposts~~ ==	+	= Sunlight Action Around Citizen United =
		+
		+	== Sunlight Blog Posts ==

	*"FCC Poised to Take the Lead on Political Advertising Transparency" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/10/27/fcc-poised-to-take-the-lead-on-political-advertising-transparency/ 10/27/2011])		*"FCC Poised to Take the Lead on Political Advertising Transparency" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/10/27/fcc-poised-to-take-the-lead-on-political-advertising-transparency/ 10/27/2011])
Line 60:		Line 62:
	*"As the money pours in, will we know where it's coming from?" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/17/as-the-money-pours-in-will-we-know-where-its-coming-from/ 5/17/2010])		*"As the money pours in, will we know where it's coming from?" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/17/as-the-money-pours-in-will-we-know-where-its-coming-from/ 5/17/2010])
	*"Comparing the House and senate Versions of the DISCLOSE Act" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/07/labor-enviro-groups-use-arkansas-senate-primary-as-citizens-united-testing-ground/ 5/5/2010])		*"Comparing the House and senate Versions of the DISCLOSE Act" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/07/labor-enviro-groups-use-arkansas-senate-primary-as-citizens-united-testing-ground/ 5/5/2010])
−	*"Birds of a Feather: What's in the 'DISCLOSE' Bills" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/05/03/birds-of-a-feather-whats-in-the-disclose-bills/ 5/3/2010])	+	*"Birds of a Feather: What's in the 'DISCLOSE' Bills" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/05/03/birds-of-a-feather-whats-in-the-disclose-bills/ 5/3/2010])
−	*"DISCLOSE Shines a Brights Light on Corporate Expenditures but Leaves Political Activities in the Shadows" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/04/29/disclose-shines-a-bright-light-on-corporate-expenditures-but-leaves-political-activities-in-the-shadows/ 4/29/2010])	+	*"DISCLOSE Shines a Brights Light on Corporate Expenditures but Leaves Political Activities in the Shadows" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/04/29/disclose-shines-a-bright-light-on-corporate-expenditures-but-leaves-political-activities-in-the-shadows/ 4/29/2010])
	*"Sunlight keeps pushing for a strong response to Citizens United" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/04/15/sunlight-keeps-pushing-for-a-strong-response-to-citizens-united/ 4/15/2010])		*"Sunlight keeps pushing for a strong response to Citizens United" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/04/15/sunlight-keeps-pushing-for-a-strong-response-to-citizens-united/ 4/15/2010])
	*"Latest from Citizens United: Disclosure, Yes. Contribution limits, No." ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/03/26/latest-from-citizens-united-disclosure-yes-contribution-limits-no/ 3/26/2010])		*"Latest from Citizens United: Disclosure, Yes. Contribution limits, No." ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/03/26/latest-from-citizens-united-disclosure-yes-contribution-limits-no/ 3/26/2010])
Line 75:		Line 77:
	*"Supreme Court Issues Major Campaign Finance Decision" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/21/supreme-court-issues-major-campaign-finance-decision/ 1/21/2010])		*"Supreme Court Issues Major Campaign Finance Decision" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/21/supreme-court-issues-major-campaign-finance-decision/ 1/21/2010])
	*"Supreme Court To Release Audio of Arguments in Citizens United To Media And National Archives" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/09/09/supreme-court-to-release-audio-of-arguments-in-citizens-united-to-media-and-national-archives/ 9/9/2009])		*"Supreme Court To Release Audio of Arguments in Citizens United To Media And National Archives" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/09/09/supreme-court-to-release-audio-of-arguments-in-citizens-united-to-media-and-national-archives/ 9/9/2009])
		+
		+	== Sunlight Resources and Projects ==
		+
		+	*[http://sunlightcam.com/ Campaign Ad Monitor]
		+	*[http://reporting.sunlightfoundation.com/outside-spending/ Follow the Unlimited Money]
		+	*[http://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/documents/hidden-money-2010-elections/ Hidden Money in the 2010 Elections: A pre-election primer on recent and recently exploited avenues for secretly funding elections]
		+	*[http://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/documents/comprehensive-disclosure-regime-wake-supreme-court/ A Comprehensive Disclosure Regime in the Wake of the Supreme Court's Decision in Citizen's United v. Federal Election Commission]

	= Legislation Introduced in Response to Citizens United <br> =		= Legislation Introduced in Response to Citizens United <br> =

Melanieb at 22:02, January 3, 2012

2012-01-03T22:02:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, January 3, 2012
Line 78:		Line 78:
	= Legislation Introduced in Response to Citizens United <br> =		= Legislation Introduced in Response to Citizens United <br> =

−	~~(1/20/~~2010 ~~to 4/30/2010; listed in order of introduction)~~<br>	+	=== 2010 Legislation<br> ===

	Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibiting corporations and labor organizations from using operating funds for advertisements in connection with any campaign for election for Federal office. [http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.111hjres68 H.J. Res 68]. Introduced 1/21/2010 by Sheila Jackson-Lee.<br>		Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibiting corporations and labor organizations from using operating funds for advertisements in connection with any campaign for election for Federal office. [http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.111hjres68 H.J. Res 68]. Introduced 1/21/2010 by Sheila Jackson-Lee.<br>
Line 140:		Line 140:
	Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States giving Congress power to regulate campaign contributions for Federal elections. [http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.111hjres84 H.J.Res. 84]. Introduced 5/13/2010 by Kurt Schrader.<br>		Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States giving Congress power to regulate campaign contributions for Federal elections. [http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.111hjres84 H.J.Res. 84]. Introduced 5/13/2010 by Kurt Schrader.<br>

−	A bill to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit foreign influence in Federal elections, to prohibit government contractors from making expenditures with respect to such elections, and to establish additional disclosure requirements with respect to spending in such elections, and for other purposes. [http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.111s3628 S. 3628]. Introduced 7/21/2010 by Sen. Schumer.<br>	+	A bill to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit foreign influence in Federal elections, to prohibit government contractors from making expenditures with respect to such elections, and to establish additional disclosure requirements with respect to spending in such elections, and for other purposes. [http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.111s3628 S. 3628]. Introduced 7/21/2010 by Sen. Schumer.<br>
		+
		+	=== 2011 Legislation ===
		+
		+	Fair Elections Now Act: [http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.112s750 S. 750.] Introduced 4/6/2011 by Sen. Richard Durbin. Also, [http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.112hr1404 H.R. 1404]. Introduced 4/6/2011 by Rep. John Larson.
		+
		+	Shareholder Protection Act of 2011: [http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.112s1360 S. 1360]. Introduced 7/13/2011 by Sen. Robert Menendez. Also, [http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.112hr2517 H.R. 2517]. Introduced 7/13/2011 by Rep. Michael Capuano.

	= An aggregation of ideas put forth in response to the Citizens United Decision =		= An aggregation of ideas put forth in response to the Citizens United Decision =

Melanieb at 21:38, January 3, 2012

2012-01-03T21:38:16Z

Melanieb at 21:35, January 3, 2012

2012-01-03T21:35:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:35, January 3, 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	== Sunlight Blogposts ==		== Sunlight Blogposts ==

		+	*"FCC Poised to Take the Lead on Political Advertising Transparency" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/10/27/fcc-poised-to-take-the-lead-on-political-advertising-transparency/ 10/27/2011])
		+	*"Preempting Sunlight" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/07/20/preempting-sunlight/ 7/20/2011])
		+	*"Democrats Opposing Contractor Disclosure Backed by Corporate Donors" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/07/19/democrats-opposing-contractor-disclosure-backed-by-corporate-donors/ 7/19/2011])
		+	*"CRS Report Highlights President's Authority Over Federal Contractors" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/06/23/crs-report-highlights-president%e2%80%99s-authority-over-federal-contractors/ 6/23/2011])
		+	*"Transparency Provisions in the Shareholder Protection Act Important to Disclose Corporate Political Expenditures" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/06/21/transparency-provisions-in-the-shareholder-protection-act-important-to-disclose-corporate-political-expenditures/ 6/21/2011])
		+	*"Senators on Armed Services Committee Should Oppose an Anti-Transparency Measure" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/06/16/senators-on-armed-services-committee-should-oppose-an-anti-transparency-measure/ 6/16/2011])
		+	*"Transbearency Strikes Back, or Citizens United and the Case for Comedy" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/05/16/transbearency-strikes-back-or-citizens-united-and-the-case-for-comedy/ 5/16/2011])
		+	*"Decision-Making on Capitol Hill Chilled by Threat of Dark Money" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/05/11/decision-making-on-capitol-hill-chilled-by-threat-of-dark-money/ 5/11/2011])
		+	*"Citizens United II: Corporate Boogaloo" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/04/27/citizens-united-ii-corporate-boogaloo/ 4/27/2011])
		+	*"Draft Executive Order on Outside Spending Disclosure would have Sweeping Reach" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/04/22/draft-executive-order-on-outside-spending-disclosure-would-have-sweeping-reach/ 4/22/2011])
		+	*"Sunlight: White House Should Release Executive Order Online Before Issuing It" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/04/20/sunlight-white-house-should-release-executive-order-online-before-issuing-it/ 4/20/2011])
		+	*"New Super PAC: Stop Public Unions Now" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/03/18/new-super-pac-stop-public-unions-now/ 3/18/2011])
		+	*"The Permanent Campaign Now More Permanent" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/03/18/the-permanent-campaign-now-more-permanent/ 3/18/2011])
		+	*"Rove Announces Crossroads Fundraising Target" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/03/01/rove-announces-crossroads-fundraising-target/ 3/1/2011])
		+	*"Good, But Not Sufficient" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/02/22/voluntary-corporate-campaign-disclosure/ 2/22/2011])
		+	*"GOP FEC Commissioners Want to Expand Citizens United" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/02/17/gop-fec-commissioners-want-to-expand-citizens-united/ 2/17/2011])
		+	*"Impotent FEC Fails to Act on Disclosure Rules" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/21/impotent-fec-fails-to-act-on-disclosure-rules/ 1/21/2011])
		+	*"Following the Activity One Year After Citizens United" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/20/after-citizens-united/ 1/20/2011])
		+	*"Happy Anniversary Citizens United" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/19/happy-anniversary-citizens-united/ 1/19/2011])
		+	*"Tom DeLay looks to Citizens United for a Bailout" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/14/tom-delay-looks-to-citizens-united-for-a-bailout/ 1/14/2011])
		+	*"Citizens United ROI" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/04/citizens-united-roi/ 1/4/2011])
		+	*"Tax laws may result in more advertising from post-Citizens United groups in 2011" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/12/23/tax-laws-may-result-in-more-advertising-from-post-citizens-united-groups-in-2011/ 12/23/2010])
		+	*"Democratic activists, donors plan separate paths for disclosed and undisclosed money in 2012 election" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/11/23/democratic-activists-donors-plan-separate-paths-for-disclosed-and-undisclosed-money-in-2012-election/ 11/23/2010])
		+	*"Sunlight Urges Congress to Pass Streamlined DISCLOSE Act During Lame Duck" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/11/18/sunlight-urges-congres-to-pass-streamlined-disclose-act-during-lame-duck/ 11/18/2010])
		+	*"The Citizens United Effect: 40 percent of outside money made possible by Supreme Court ruling" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/11/04/the-citizens-united-effect-40-percent-of-outside-money-made-possible-by-supreme-court-ruling/ 11/4/2010])
		+	*"Hydra of Independent Groups Fuels Republican Side" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/10/21/hydra-of-independent-groups-fuels-republican-side/ 10/21/2011])
		+	*"Citizens United: Before, After, What's Next?" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/10/19/citizens-united-before-after-what%e2%80%99s-next/ 10/19/2010])
		+	*"Court Rulings Change Elections, Independent Spending Dwarfs Party Spending in Midterm" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/10/15/court-rulings-change-elections-independent-spending-dwarfs-party-spending-in-midterm/ 10/15/2010])
		+	*"Super PACs: Track (and read all about) them on the Reporting Group site)" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/09/28/super-pacs-track-and-read-all-about-them-on-the-reporting-group-site/ 9/28/2010])
		+	*"Become a Sunlight Campaign Ad Monitor" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/09/21/become-a-sunlight-campaign-ad-monitor/ 9/21/2010])
		+	*"Post-Citizens United disclosure is down significantly" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/09/20/post-citizens-united-disclosure-is-down-significantly/ 9/20/2010])
		+	*"Big Oil Money at the State Level mostly goes to Influence the Public, not the Politicians" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/17/big-oil-money-at-the-state-level-mostly-goes-to-influence-the-public-not-the-politicians/ 8/17/2010])
		+	*"Less of a non-sequitur response on campaign finance" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/16/less-of-a-non-sequitor-response-on-campaign-finance/ 8/16/2010])
		+	*"Citizens Not Increasing Scrutiny" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/12/citizens-not-increasing-scrutiny/ 8/12/2010])
		+	*"New Stakes for Government Reform" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/11/new-stakes-for-government-reform/ 8/11/2010])
		+	*"No Country for Self-Funders" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/09/no-country-for-self-funders/ 8/9/2010])
		+	*"Partisan Self-Preservation may Derail DISCLOSE" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/07/26/partisan-self-preservation-may-derail-disclose/ 7/26/2010])
		+	*"How the Supreme Court Misunderestimates The Power of Technology in Doe v. Reed" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/28/how-the-supreme-court-misunderestimates-the-power-of-technology-in-doe-v-reed/ 6/28/2010])
		+	*"The Ticking Time Bomb in the Supreem Court's Doe v. Reed Opinion" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/25/the-ticking-time-bomb-in-the-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-doe-v-reed-opinion/ 6/25/2010])
		+	*"What Does an Election Cost?" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/22/what-does-an-election-cost/ 6/22/2010])
		+	*"DISCLOSE may provide no disclosure for NRA" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/15/disclose-may-provide-no-disclosure-for-nra/ 6/15/2010])<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>
		+	*"'Breakthrough' on DISCLOSE Act" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/14/breakthrough-on-disclose-act/ 6/14/2010])
		+	*"Labor, Enviro Groups Use Arkansas Senate Primary as Citizens United Testing Ground" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/07/labor-enviro-groups-use-arkansas-senate-primary-as-citizens-united-testing-ground/ 6/7/2010])<br>
	*"Electronic Filing Provision included in DISCLOSE Act: A Win for Transparency" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/20/electronic-filing-provision-included-in-disclose-act-a-win-for-transparency/ 5/20/2010])		*"Electronic Filing Provision included in DISCLOSE Act: A Win for Transparency" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/20/electronic-filing-provision-included-in-disclose-act-a-win-for-transparency/ 5/20/2010])
	*"Rep. Susan Davis to Offer Amendment to Strengthen DISCLOSE Act" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/20/rep-susan-davis-to-offer-amendment-to-strengthen-disclose-act/ 5/20/2010])		*"Rep. Susan Davis to Offer Amendment to Strengthen DISCLOSE Act" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/20/rep-susan-davis-to-offer-amendment-to-strengthen-disclose-act/ 5/20/2010])
−	*"As the money ~~pous~~ in, will we know where it's coming from?" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/17/as-the-money-pours-in-will-we-know-where-its-coming-from/ 5/17/2010])	+	*"As the money pours in, will we know where it's coming from?" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/17/as-the-money-pours-in-will-we-know-where-its-coming-from/ 5/17/2010])
		+	*"Comparing the House and senate Versions of the DISCLOSE Act" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/07/labor-enviro-groups-use-arkansas-senate-primary-as-citizens-united-testing-ground/ 5/5/2010])
	*"Sunlight keeps pushing for a strong response to Citizens United" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/04/15/sunlight-keeps-pushing-for-a-strong-response-to-citizens-united/ 4/15/2010])		*"Sunlight keeps pushing for a strong response to Citizens United" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/04/15/sunlight-keeps-pushing-for-a-strong-response-to-citizens-united/ 4/15/2010])
	*"Latest from Citizens United: Disclosure, Yes. Contribution limits, No." ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/03/26/latest-from-citizens-united-disclosure-yes-contribution-limits-no/ 3/26/2010])		*"Latest from Citizens United: Disclosure, Yes. Contribution limits, No." ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/03/26/latest-from-citizens-united-disclosure-yes-contribution-limits-no/ 3/26/2010])

JeffClements at 13:59, October 5, 2010

2010-10-05T13:59:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, October 5, 2010
Line 366:		Line 366:
	== Constitutional Amendment ==		== Constitutional Amendment ==

−	The campaign for a Constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and the fabrication of "corporate rights" continues to gain momentum as it becomes clear that the idea of corporate treasuries as "speech" is incompatible with an American free democracy and government of the people. Free Speech for People  http://www.freespeechforpeople.org  is leading the campaign; hundreds of thousands of Americans have signed petitions calling for such an amendment; several amendment bills have been introduced in the House and Senate; and numerous resolutions calling for an amendment to be sent to the states have been introduced or enacted in various states.  On October 4, 2010, a bipartisan group of more than 50 leading law professors and former prosecutors and public servants, including 7 former state Attorneys General, called on Congress to consider a Constitutional amendment to overrule Citizens United.  The letter can be found here: http://freespeechforpeople.org/sites/default/files/finalfsfppfaw.pdf	+	The campaign for a Constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and the fabrication of "corporate rights" continues to gain momentum as it becomes clear that the idea of corporate treasuries as "speech" is incompatible with an American free democracy and government of the people. Free Speech for People  http://www.freespeechforpeople.org  is leading the campaign; hundreds of thousands of Americans have signed petitions calling for such an amendment; several amendment bills have been introduced in the House and Senate; and numerous resolutions calling for an amendment to be sent to the states have been introduced or enacted in various states.  On October 4, 2010, a bipartisan group of more than 50 leading law professors and former prosecutors and public servants, including 7 former state Attorneys General, called on Congress to consider a Constitutional amendment to overrule Citizens United.  The letter can be found here: http://freespeechforpeople.org/sites/default/files/finalfsfppfaw.pdf

−	People can sign a petition to call for overruling Citizens United here:  http://www.freespeechforpeople.org/petition	+	People can sign a petition to call for overruling Citizens United here:  http://www.freespeechforpeople.org/petition

	A constitutional amendment. Are you kidding? A supermajority of Congress and the States to put limits on corporate spending. Not in my lifetime.[http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Richard_Hasen_1FE691B8-7BF2-481C-B3BC-BB4072BC1703.html Rick Hasen]		A constitutional amendment. Are you kidding? A supermajority of Congress and the States to put limits on corporate spending. Not in my lifetime.[http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Richard_Hasen_1FE691B8-7BF2-481C-B3BC-BB4072BC1703.html Rick Hasen]

−	3/4 of Americans of all political inclinations want an amendment now.  See poll here: http://www.pfaw.org/sites/default/files/CitUPoll-PFAW.pdf	+	3/4 of Americans of all political inclinations want an amendment now.  See poll here: http://www.pfaw.org/sites/default/files/CitUPoll-PFAW.pdf

	Free Speech for People Constitutional Amendment - [http://action.citizen.org/t/10315/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=2190 Petition by Public Citizen]<br>		Free Speech for People Constitutional Amendment - [http://action.citizen.org/t/10315/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=2190 Petition by Public Citizen]<br>

JeffClements at 13:58, October 5, 2010

2010-10-05T13:58:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:58, October 5, 2010
Line 366:		Line 366:
	== Constitutional Amendment ==		== Constitutional Amendment ==

−	The campaign for a Constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and the fabrication of "corporate rights" continues to gain momentum as it becomes clear that the idea of corporate treasuries as "speech" is incompatible with an American free democracy and government of the people. Free Speech for People [ http://www.freespeechforpeople.org ] is leading the campaign; hundreds of thousands of Americans have signed petitions calling for such an amendment; several amendment bills have been introduced in the House and Senate; and numerous resolutions calling for an amendment to be sent to the states have been introduced or enacted in various states.  On October 4, 2010, a bipartisan group of more than 50 leading law professors and former prosecutors and public servants, including 7 former state Attorneys General, called on Congress to consider a Constitutional amendment to overrule Citizens United.  The letter can be found here [ http://freespeechforpeople.org/sites/default/files/finalfsfppfaw.pdf ]	+	The campaign for a Constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and the fabrication of "corporate rights" continues to gain momentum as it becomes clear that the idea of corporate treasuries as "speech" is incompatible with an American free democracy and government of the people. Free Speech for People  http://www.freespeechforpeople.org  is leading the campaign; hundreds of thousands of Americans have signed petitions calling for such an amendment; several amendment bills have been introduced in the House and Senate; and numerous resolutions calling for an amendment to be sent to the states have been introduced or enacted in various states.  On October 4, 2010, a bipartisan group of more than 50 leading law professors and former prosecutors and public servants, including 7 former state Attorneys General, called on Congress to consider a Constitutional amendment to overrule Citizens United.  The letter can be found here: http://freespeechforpeople.org/sites/default/files/finalfsfppfaw.pdf
		+
		+	People can sign a petition to call for overruling Citizens United here:  http://www.freespeechforpeople.org/petition

	A constitutional amendment. Are you kidding? A supermajority of Congress and the States to put limits on corporate spending. Not in my lifetime.[http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Richard_Hasen_1FE691B8-7BF2-481C-B3BC-BB4072BC1703.html Rick Hasen]		A constitutional amendment. Are you kidding? A supermajority of Congress and the States to put limits on corporate spending. Not in my lifetime.[http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Richard_Hasen_1FE691B8-7BF2-481C-B3BC-BB4072BC1703.html Rick Hasen]

−	3/4 of Americans of all political inclinations want an amendment now.  See poll here [ http://www.pfaw.org/sites/default/files/CitUPoll-PFAW.pdf ]	+	3/4 of Americans of all political inclinations want an amendment now.  See poll here: http://www.pfaw.org/sites/default/files/CitUPoll-PFAW.pdf

−	Free Speech for People Constitutional Amendment - [http://action.citizen.org/t/10315/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=2190 Petition by Public Citizen]<br>	+	Free Speech for People Constitutional Amendment - [http://action.citizen.org/t/10315/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=2190 Petition by Public Citizen]<br>

	= State and Local Resources =		= State and Local Resources =

	The National Conference of State Legislatures has a list of [http://www.ncsl.org/LegislaturesElections/ElectionsCampaigns/CitizensUnitedandtheStates/tabid/19607/Default.aspx state responses] to Citizens United.		The National Conference of State Legislatures has a list of [http://www.ncsl.org/LegislaturesElections/ElectionsCampaigns/CitizensUnitedandtheStates/tabid/19607/Default.aspx state responses] to Citizens United.

JeffClements at 13:55, October 5, 2010

2010-10-05T13:55:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, October 5, 2010
Line 366:		Line 366:
	== Constitutional Amendment ==		== Constitutional Amendment ==

−	The campaign for a Constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and the fabrication of "corporate rights" continues to gain momentum as it becomes clear that the idea of corporate treasuries as "speech" is incompatible with an American free democracy and government of the people. [ Free Speech for People http://www.freespeechforpeople.org ] is leading the campaign; hundreds of thousands of Americans have signed petitions calling for such an amendment; several amendment bills have been introduced in the House and Senate; and numerous resolutions calling for an amendment to be sent to the states have been introduced or enacted in various states.  On October 4, 2010, a bipartisan group of more than 50 leading law professors and former prosecutors and public servants, including 7 former state Attorneys General, called on Congress to consider a Constitutional amendment to overrule Citizens United.  The letter can be found [ ~~here ~~http://freespeechforpeople.org/sites/default/files/finalfsfppfaw.pdf ]	+	The campaign for a Constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and the fabrication of "corporate rights" continues to gain momentum as it becomes clear that the idea of corporate treasuries as "speech" is incompatible with an American free democracy and government of the people. Free Speech for People [ http://www.freespeechforpeople.org ] is leading the campaign; hundreds of thousands of Americans have signed petitions calling for such an amendment; several amendment bills have been introduced in the House and Senate; and numerous resolutions calling for an amendment to be sent to the states have been introduced or enacted in various states.  On October 4, 2010, a bipartisan group of more than 50 leading law professors and former prosecutors and public servants, including 7 former state Attorneys General, called on Congress to consider a Constitutional amendment to overrule Citizens United.  The letter can be found here [ http://freespeechforpeople.org/sites/default/files/finalfsfppfaw.pdf ]

	A constitutional amendment. Are you kidding? A supermajority of Congress and the States to put limits on corporate spending. Not in my lifetime.[http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Richard_Hasen_1FE691B8-7BF2-481C-B3BC-BB4072BC1703.html Rick Hasen]		A constitutional amendment. Are you kidding? A supermajority of Congress and the States to put limits on corporate spending. Not in my lifetime.[http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Richard_Hasen_1FE691B8-7BF2-481C-B3BC-BB4072BC1703.html Rick Hasen]

−	~~Actually,~~ 3/4 of Americans of all political inclinations want an amendment now.  See poll [ ~~here ~~http://www.pfaw.org/sites/default/files/CitUPoll-PFAW.pdf ]	+	3/4 of Americans of all political inclinations want an amendment now.  See poll here [ http://www.pfaw.org/sites/default/files/CitUPoll-PFAW.pdf ]

	Free Speech for People Constitutional Amendment - [http://action.citizen.org/t/10315/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=2190 Petition by Public Citizen]<br>		Free Speech for People Constitutional Amendment - [http://action.citizen.org/t/10315/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=2190 Petition by Public Citizen]<br>

JeffClements: Campaign for a Constitutional amendment gains momentum

2010-10-05T13:53:53Z

Campaign for a Constitutional amendment gains momentum

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, October 5, 2010
Line 365:		Line 365:

	== Constitutional Amendment ==		== Constitutional Amendment ==
		+
		+	The campaign for a Constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and the fabrication of "corporate rights" continues to gain momentum as it becomes clear that the idea of corporate treasuries as "speech" is incompatible with an American free democracy and government of the people. [ Free Speech for People http://www.freespeechforpeople.org ] is leading the campaign; hundreds of thousands of Americans have signed petitions calling for such an amendment; several amendment bills have been introduced in the House and Senate; and numerous resolutions calling for an amendment to be sent to the states have been introduced or enacted in various states.  On October 4, 2010, a bipartisan group of more than 50 leading law professors and former prosecutors and public servants, including 7 former state Attorneys General, called on Congress to consider a Constitutional amendment to overrule Citizens United.  The letter can be found [ here http://freespeechforpeople.org/sites/default/files/finalfsfppfaw.pdf ]

	A constitutional amendment. Are you kidding? A supermajority of Congress and the States to put limits on corporate spending. Not in my lifetime.[http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Richard_Hasen_1FE691B8-7BF2-481C-B3BC-BB4072BC1703.html Rick Hasen]		A constitutional amendment. Are you kidding? A supermajority of Congress and the States to put limits on corporate spending. Not in my lifetime.[http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Richard_Hasen_1FE691B8-7BF2-481C-B3BC-BB4072BC1703.html Rick Hasen]
		+
		+	Actually, 3/4 of Americans of all political inclinations want an amendment now.  See poll [ here http://www.pfaw.org/sites/default/files/CitUPoll-PFAW.pdf ]

	Free Speech for People Constitutional Amendment - [http://action.citizen.org/t/10315/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=2190 Petition by Public Citizen]<br>		Free Speech for People Constitutional Amendment - [http://action.citizen.org/t/10315/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=2190 Petition by Public Citizen]<br>

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, January 3, 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	== Sunlight Blogposts ==		== Sunlight Blogposts ==

−	*"FCC Poised to Take the Lead on Political Advertising Transparency" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/10/27/fcc-poised-to-take-the-lead-on-political-advertising-transparency/ 10/27/2011])	+	*"FCC Poised to Take the Lead on Political Advertising Transparency" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/10/27/fcc-poised-to-take-the-lead-on-political-advertising-transparency/ 10/27/2011])
−	*"Preempting Sunlight" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/07/20/preempting-sunlight/ 7/20/2011])	+	*"Preempting Sunlight" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/07/20/preempting-sunlight/ 7/20/2011])
−	*"Democrats Opposing Contractor Disclosure Backed by Corporate Donors" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/07/19/democrats-opposing-contractor-disclosure-backed-by-corporate-donors/ 7/19/2011])	+	*"Democrats Opposing Contractor Disclosure Backed by Corporate Donors" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/07/19/democrats-opposing-contractor-disclosure-backed-by-corporate-donors/ 7/19/2011])
−	*"CRS Report Highlights President's Authority Over Federal Contractors" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/06/23/crs-report-highlights-president%e2%80%99s-authority-over-federal-contractors/ 6/23/2011])	+	*"CRS Report Highlights President's Authority Over Federal Contractors" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/06/23/crs-report-highlights-president%e2%80%99s-authority-over-federal-contractors/ 6/23/2011])
−	*"Transparency Provisions in the Shareholder Protection Act Important to Disclose Corporate Political Expenditures" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/06/21/transparency-provisions-in-the-shareholder-protection-act-important-to-disclose-corporate-political-expenditures/ 6/21/2011])	+	*"Transparency Provisions in the Shareholder Protection Act Important to Disclose Corporate Political Expenditures" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/06/21/transparency-provisions-in-the-shareholder-protection-act-important-to-disclose-corporate-political-expenditures/ 6/21/2011])
−	*"Senators on Armed Services Committee Should Oppose an Anti-Transparency Measure" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/06/16/senators-on-armed-services-committee-should-oppose-an-anti-transparency-measure/ 6/16/2011])	+	*"Senators on Armed Services Committee Should Oppose an Anti-Transparency Measure" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/06/16/senators-on-armed-services-committee-should-oppose-an-anti-transparency-measure/ 6/16/2011])
−	*"Transbearency Strikes Back, or Citizens United and the Case for Comedy" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/05/16/transbearency-strikes-back-or-citizens-united-and-the-case-for-comedy/ 5/16/2011])	+	*"Transbearency Strikes Back, or Citizens United and the Case for Comedy" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/05/16/transbearency-strikes-back-or-citizens-united-and-the-case-for-comedy/ 5/16/2011])
−	*"Decision-Making on Capitol Hill Chilled by Threat of Dark Money" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/05/11/decision-making-on-capitol-hill-chilled-by-threat-of-dark-money/ 5/11/2011])	+	*"Decision-Making on Capitol Hill Chilled by Threat of Dark Money" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/05/11/decision-making-on-capitol-hill-chilled-by-threat-of-dark-money/ 5/11/2011])
−	*"Citizens United II: Corporate Boogaloo" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/04/27/citizens-united-ii-corporate-boogaloo/ 4/27/2011])	+	*"Citizens United II: Corporate Boogaloo" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/04/27/citizens-united-ii-corporate-boogaloo/ 4/27/2011])
−	*"Draft Executive Order on Outside Spending Disclosure would have Sweeping Reach" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/04/22/draft-executive-order-on-outside-spending-disclosure-would-have-sweeping-reach/ 4/22/2011])	+	*"Draft Executive Order on Outside Spending Disclosure would have Sweeping Reach" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/04/22/draft-executive-order-on-outside-spending-disclosure-would-have-sweeping-reach/ 4/22/2011])
−	*"Sunlight: White House Should Release Executive Order Online Before Issuing It" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/04/20/sunlight-white-house-should-release-executive-order-online-before-issuing-it/ 4/20/2011])	+	*"Sunlight: White House Should Release Executive Order Online Before Issuing It" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/04/20/sunlight-white-house-should-release-executive-order-online-before-issuing-it/ 4/20/2011])
−	*"New Super PAC: Stop Public Unions Now" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/03/18/new-super-pac-stop-public-unions-now/ 3/18/2011])	+	*"New Super PAC: Stop Public Unions Now" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/03/18/new-super-pac-stop-public-unions-now/ 3/18/2011])
−	*"The Permanent Campaign Now More Permanent" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/03/18/the-permanent-campaign-now-more-permanent/ 3/18/2011])	+	*"The Permanent Campaign Now More Permanent" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/03/18/the-permanent-campaign-now-more-permanent/ 3/18/2011])
−	*"Rove Announces Crossroads Fundraising Target" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/03/01/rove-announces-crossroads-fundraising-target/ 3/1/2011])	+	*"Rove Announces Crossroads Fundraising Target" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/03/01/rove-announces-crossroads-fundraising-target/ 3/1/2011])
−	*"Good, But Not Sufficient" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/02/22/voluntary-corporate-campaign-disclosure/ 2/22/2011])	+	*"Good, But Not Sufficient" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/02/22/voluntary-corporate-campaign-disclosure/ 2/22/2011])
−	*"GOP FEC Commissioners Want to Expand Citizens United" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/02/17/gop-fec-commissioners-want-to-expand-citizens-united/ 2/17/2011])	+	*"GOP FEC Commissioners Want to Expand Citizens United" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/02/17/gop-fec-commissioners-want-to-expand-citizens-united/ 2/17/2011])
−	*"Impotent FEC Fails to Act on Disclosure Rules" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/21/impotent-fec-fails-to-act-on-disclosure-rules/ 1/21/2011])	+	*"Impotent FEC Fails to Act on Disclosure Rules" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/21/impotent-fec-fails-to-act-on-disclosure-rules/ 1/21/2011])
−	*"Following the Activity One Year After Citizens United" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/20/after-citizens-united/ 1/20/2011])	+	*"Following the Activity One Year After Citizens United" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/20/after-citizens-united/ 1/20/2011])
−	*"Happy Anniversary Citizens United" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/19/happy-anniversary-citizens-united/ 1/19/2011])	+	*"Happy Anniversary Citizens United" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/19/happy-anniversary-citizens-united/ 1/19/2011])
−	*"Tom DeLay looks to Citizens United for a Bailout" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/14/tom-delay-looks-to-citizens-united-for-a-bailout/ 1/14/2011])	+	*"Tom DeLay looks to Citizens United for a Bailout" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/14/tom-delay-looks-to-citizens-united-for-a-bailout/ 1/14/2011])
−	*"Citizens United ROI" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/04/citizens-united-roi/ 1/4/2011])	+	*"Citizens United ROI" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2011/01/04/citizens-united-roi/ 1/4/2011])
−	*"Tax laws may result in more advertising from post-Citizens United groups in 2011" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/12/23/tax-laws-may-result-in-more-advertising-from-post-citizens-united-groups-in-2011/ 12/23/2010])	+	*"Tax laws may result in more advertising from post-Citizens United groups in 2011" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/12/23/tax-laws-may-result-in-more-advertising-from-post-citizens-united-groups-in-2011/ 12/23/2010])
−	*"Democratic activists, donors plan separate paths for disclosed and undisclosed money in 2012 election" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/11/23/democratic-activists-donors-plan-separate-paths-for-disclosed-and-undisclosed-money-in-2012-election/ 11/23/2010])	+	*"Democratic activists, donors plan separate paths for disclosed and undisclosed money in 2012 election" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/11/23/democratic-activists-donors-plan-separate-paths-for-disclosed-and-undisclosed-money-in-2012-election/ 11/23/2010])
−	*"Sunlight Urges Congress to Pass Streamlined DISCLOSE Act During Lame Duck" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/11/18/sunlight-urges-congres-to-pass-streamlined-disclose-act-during-lame-duck/ 11/18/2010])	+	*"Sunlight Urges Congress to Pass Streamlined DISCLOSE Act During Lame Duck" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/11/18/sunlight-urges-congres-to-pass-streamlined-disclose-act-during-lame-duck/ 11/18/2010])
−	*"The Citizens United Effect: 40 percent of outside money made possible by Supreme Court ruling" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/11/04/the-citizens-united-effect-40-percent-of-outside-money-made-possible-by-supreme-court-ruling/ 11/4/2010])	+	*"The Citizens United Effect: 40 percent of outside money made possible by Supreme Court ruling" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/11/04/the-citizens-united-effect-40-percent-of-outside-money-made-possible-by-supreme-court-ruling/ 11/4/2010])
−	*"Hydra of Independent Groups Fuels Republican Side" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/10/21/hydra-of-independent-groups-fuels-republican-side/ 10/21/2011])	+	*"Hydra of Independent Groups Fuels Republican Side" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/10/21/hydra-of-independent-groups-fuels-republican-side/ 10/21/2011])
−	*"Citizens United: Before, After, What's Next?" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/10/19/citizens-united-before-after-what%e2%80%99s-next/ 10/19/2010])	+	*"Citizens United: Before, After, What's Next?" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/10/19/citizens-united-before-after-what%e2%80%99s-next/ 10/19/2010])
−	*"Court Rulings Change Elections, Independent Spending Dwarfs Party Spending in Midterm" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/10/15/court-rulings-change-elections-independent-spending-dwarfs-party-spending-in-midterm/ 10/15/2010])	+	*"Court Rulings Change Elections, Independent Spending Dwarfs Party Spending in Midterm" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/10/15/court-rulings-change-elections-independent-spending-dwarfs-party-spending-in-midterm/ 10/15/2010])
−	*"Super PACs: Track (and read all about) them on the Reporting Group site)" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/09/28/super-pacs-track-and-read-all-about-them-on-the-reporting-group-site/ 9/28/2010])	+	*"Super PACs: Track (and read all about) them on the Reporting Group site)" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/09/28/super-pacs-track-and-read-all-about-them-on-the-reporting-group-site/ 9/28/2010])
−	*"Become a Sunlight Campaign Ad Monitor" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/09/21/become-a-sunlight-campaign-ad-monitor/ 9/21/2010])	+	*"Become a Sunlight Campaign Ad Monitor" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/09/21/become-a-sunlight-campaign-ad-monitor/ 9/21/2010])
−	*"Post-Citizens United disclosure is down significantly" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/09/20/post-citizens-united-disclosure-is-down-significantly/ 9/20/2010])	+	*"Post-Citizens United disclosure is down significantly" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/09/20/post-citizens-united-disclosure-is-down-significantly/ 9/20/2010])
−	*"Big Oil Money at the State Level mostly goes to Influence the Public, not the Politicians" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/17/big-oil-money-at-the-state-level-mostly-goes-to-influence-the-public-not-the-politicians/ 8/17/2010])	+	*"Big Oil Money at the State Level mostly goes to Influence the Public, not the Politicians" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/17/big-oil-money-at-the-state-level-mostly-goes-to-influence-the-public-not-the-politicians/ 8/17/2010])
−	*"Less of a non-sequitur response on campaign finance" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/16/less-of-a-non-sequitor-response-on-campaign-finance/ 8/16/2010])	+	*"Less of a non-sequitur response on campaign finance" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/16/less-of-a-non-sequitor-response-on-campaign-finance/ 8/16/2010])
−	*"Citizens Not Increasing Scrutiny" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/12/citizens-not-increasing-scrutiny/ 8/12/2010])	+	*"Citizens Not Increasing Scrutiny" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/12/citizens-not-increasing-scrutiny/ 8/12/2010])
−	*"New Stakes for Government Reform" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/11/new-stakes-for-government-reform/ 8/11/2010])	+	*"New Stakes for Government Reform" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/11/new-stakes-for-government-reform/ 8/11/2010])
−	*"No Country for Self-Funders" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/09/no-country-for-self-funders/ 8/9/2010])	+	*"No Country for Self-Funders" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/08/09/no-country-for-self-funders/ 8/9/2010])
−	*"Partisan Self-Preservation may Derail DISCLOSE" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/07/26/partisan-self-preservation-may-derail-disclose/ 7/26/2010])	+	*"Partisan Self-Preservation may Derail DISCLOSE" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/07/26/partisan-self-preservation-may-derail-disclose/ 7/26/2010])
−	*"How the Supreme Court Misunderestimates The Power of Technology in Doe v. Reed" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/28/how-the-supreme-court-misunderestimates-the-power-of-technology-in-doe-v-reed/ 6/28/2010])	+	*"How the Supreme Court Misunderestimates The Power of Technology in Doe v. Reed" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/28/how-the-supreme-court-misunderestimates-the-power-of-technology-in-doe-v-reed/ 6/28/2010])
−	*"The Ticking Time Bomb in the Supreem Court's Doe v. Reed Opinion" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/25/the-ticking-time-bomb-in-the-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-doe-v-reed-opinion/ 6/25/2010])	+	*"The Ticking Time Bomb in the Supreem Court's Doe v. Reed Opinion" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/25/the-ticking-time-bomb-in-the-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-doe-v-reed-opinion/ 6/25/2010])
−	*"What Does an Election Cost?" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/22/what-does-an-election-cost/ 6/22/2010])	+	*"What Does an Election Cost?" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/22/what-does-an-election-cost/ 6/22/2010])
−	*"DISCLOSE may provide no disclosure for NRA" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/15/disclose-may-provide-no-disclosure-for-nra/ 6/15/2010])<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>	+	*"DISCLOSE may provide no disclosure for NRA" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/15/disclose-may-provide-no-disclosure-for-nra/ 6/15/2010])<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>
−	*"'Breakthrough' on DISCLOSE Act" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/14/breakthrough-on-disclose-act/ 6/14/2010])	+	*"'Breakthrough' on DISCLOSE Act" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/14/breakthrough-on-disclose-act/ 6/14/2010])
−	*"Labor, Enviro Groups Use Arkansas Senate Primary as Citizens United Testing Ground" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/07/labor-enviro-groups-use-arkansas-senate-primary-as-citizens-united-testing-ground/ 6/7/2010])<br>	+	*"Labor, Enviro Groups Use Arkansas Senate Primary as Citizens United Testing Ground" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/07/labor-enviro-groups-use-arkansas-senate-primary-as-citizens-united-testing-ground/ 6/7/2010])<br>
	*"Electronic Filing Provision included in DISCLOSE Act: A Win for Transparency" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/20/electronic-filing-provision-included-in-disclose-act-a-win-for-transparency/ 5/20/2010])		*"Electronic Filing Provision included in DISCLOSE Act: A Win for Transparency" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/20/electronic-filing-provision-included-in-disclose-act-a-win-for-transparency/ 5/20/2010])
	*"Rep. Susan Davis to Offer Amendment to Strengthen DISCLOSE Act" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/20/rep-susan-davis-to-offer-amendment-to-strengthen-disclose-act/ 5/20/2010])		*"Rep. Susan Davis to Offer Amendment to Strengthen DISCLOSE Act" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/20/rep-susan-davis-to-offer-amendment-to-strengthen-disclose-act/ 5/20/2010])
	*"As the money pours in, will we know where it's coming from?" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/17/as-the-money-pours-in-will-we-know-where-its-coming-from/ 5/17/2010])		*"As the money pours in, will we know where it's coming from?" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/05/17/as-the-money-pours-in-will-we-know-where-its-coming-from/ 5/17/2010])
−	*"Comparing the House and senate Versions of the DISCLOSE Act" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/07/labor-enviro-groups-use-arkansas-senate-primary-as-citizens-united-testing-ground/ 5/5/2010])	+	*"Comparing the House and senate Versions of the DISCLOSE Act" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/06/07/labor-enviro-groups-use-arkansas-senate-primary-as-citizens-united-testing-ground/ 5/5/2010])
		+	*"Birds of a Feather: What's in the 'DISCLOSE' Bills" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/05/03/birds-of-a-feather-whats-in-the-disclose-bills/ 5/3/2010])
		+	*"DISCLOSE Shines a Brights Light on Corporate Expenditures but Leaves Political Activities in the Shadows" ([http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2010/04/29/disclose-shines-a-bright-light-on-corporate-expenditures-but-leaves-political-activities-in-the-shadows/ 4/29/2010])
	*"Sunlight keeps pushing for a strong response to Citizens United" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/04/15/sunlight-keeps-pushing-for-a-strong-response-to-citizens-united/ 4/15/2010])		*"Sunlight keeps pushing for a strong response to Citizens United" ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/04/15/sunlight-keeps-pushing-for-a-strong-response-to-citizens-united/ 4/15/2010])
	*"Latest from Citizens United: Disclosure, Yes. Contribution limits, No." ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/03/26/latest-from-citizens-united-disclosure-yes-contribution-limits-no/ 3/26/2010])		*"Latest from Citizens United: Disclosure, Yes. Contribution limits, No." ([http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/03/26/latest-from-citizens-united-disclosure-yes-contribution-limits-no/ 3/26/2010])