From OpenCongress Wiki

You do not have permission to edit pages, for the following reason:

You can view and copy the source of this page:

{{Energy and Environment Policy (U.S.)|congress=110|bill=h2421}} The '''Clean Water Restoration Act of 2007''', introduced during the [[110th Congress]], sought to clarify the jurisdiction of the U.S. government over waters located in the country, largely for the purpose of dealing with water pollution. <usbillinfo congress="110" bill="H.R.2421" /> == House == The bill ([http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2421/show H.R. 2421]) was introduced by Rep. [[Jim Oberstar]] (D-Minn.), chair of the [[House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee]], on May 22, 2007. As of June 12, 2007, it had collected 162 cosponsors.<ref>[http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2421/show "OpenCongress page on H.R. 2421"] ''OpenCongress.''</ref> === Details === The measure amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act in order to clarify the jurisdiction of the U.S. federal government in dealing with water pollution. To allow the jurisdiction to unambiguously extend to all waters in the U.S., it replaces the existing term "navigable waters" with "waters of the United States", which means "all waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, the territorial seas, and all interstate and intrastate waters and their tributaries, including lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, natural ponds, and all impoundments of the foregoing, to the fullest extent that these waters, or activities affecting these waters." <ref>[http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2421/show "OpenCongress page on H.R. 2421"] ''OpenCongress.''</ref> According to Beth Wellington of ''The Writing Corner'', the measure, first introduced in 2003, is a response to U.S. Supreme Court decisions which previously eroded the strength of the Clean Water Act. For instance, the court's ruling in ''Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States'' (SWANCC) removed federal protection of "isolated" waters based solely on their use by migratory birds. The consolidated cases of ''Carabell v. United States'' and ''Rapanos v. United States'', decided in June 2006, also eroded wetland protections.<ref>[http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-6IqCKWAzfrLlzHFAL37elhA-?cq=1 "The Writing Corner"] ''The Writing Corner.''</ref> === Support and opposition === ==== Support ==== The measure received the support of environmental and citizens groups such as Riverkeeper, U.S. PIRG, Natural Resources Defense Fund, EarthJustice, [[National Wildlife Federation]], Citizen's Campaign for the Environment, and the [[Sierra Club]]. <ref>[http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-6IqCKWAzfrLlzHFAL37elhA-?cq=1 "The Writing Corner"] ''The Writing Corner.''</ref> ==== Opposition ==== The measure was opposed by the National Water Resources Associations, a nonprofit federation which includes rural water districts, municipal water entities, and commercial companies and individuals. It was also opposed by the National Association of Counties, the National Corn Growers Association, and others.<ref>[http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-6IqCKWAzfrLlzHFAL37elhA-?cq=1 "The Writing Corner"] ''The Writing Corner.''</ref> == Articles and resources == === References === <references /> === External resources === *[http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2421/show Open Congress page on the bill] *[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.02421: Thomas page on the bill] === External articles === {{congresspedia}} [[Category:U.S._legislation]] [[Category:Environment]] [[Category:Water]] [[Category:United_States]]

• Template:Congresspedia
• Template:Energy and Environment Policy (U.S.)

Return to Clean Water Restoration Act of 2007.