Nancy Pelosi

From OpenCongress Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search

Line 1: Line 1:
{{Senator header|state=California}}{{congresspedia}}
+
{{Senator header|state=California}}{{congresspedia}} [[Image:Nancypelosi.jpg|thumb|Nancy Pelosi currently serves the 8th Congressional district of California]]  
[[Image:nancypelosi.jpg|thumb|Nancy Pelosi currently serves the 8th Congressional district of California]]
+
  
'''Nancy Patricia D'Alesandro Pelosi''' is the [[House leadership|Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives]] for the [[110th Congress]]. A [[United States Democratic Party|Democrat]], she is the first woman to hold the post of Speaker, or even lead a major political party in either house of Congress. She has represented the 8th District of [[:Category:Members of the U.S. Congress from California|California]] in the [[United States House of Representatives]] since 1987. ([http://nationalatlas.gov/printable/images/preview/congdist/ca08_109.gif map])
+
'''Nancy Patricia D'Alesandro Pelosi''' is the [[House leadership|Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives]] for the [[110th Congress]]. A [[United States Democratic Party|Democrat]], she is the first woman to hold the post of Speaker, or even lead a major political party in either house of Congress. She has represented the 8th District of [[:Category:Members of the U.S. Congress from California|California]] in the [[United States House of Representatives]] since 1987. ([http://nationalatlas.gov/printable/images/preview/congdist/ca08_109.gif map])  
 +
 
 +
== Record and controversies ==
  
==Record and controversies==
 
 
{{Congresspedia voting record}}  
 
{{Congresspedia voting record}}  
  
===Iraq War===
+
=== Iraq War ===
Pelosi voted against the [[Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002]] that started the Iraq War.<ref>[http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll455.xml Roll call vote], Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002.</ref>
+
 
 +
Pelosi voted against the [[Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002]] that started the Iraq War.<ref>[http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll455.xml Roll call vote], Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002.</ref>  
 +
 
 +
{{Iraq War House record}}
 +
 
 +
==== Indicates opposition to proposed "troop surge" in Iraq ====
  
{{Iraq War House record}}
+
Pelosi (D-Calif.) stated that she, along with Majority Leader [[Harry Reid]] (D-Nev.), “informed the president that they were opposed to increasing troop levels.” Both Pelosi and Reid expressed their disapproval in a letter to Bush on January 5, 2007, several days before the Bush's speech announcing the "surge" but after its content was leaked to the public.  
====Indicates opposition to proposed "troop surge" in Iraq====
+
Pelosi (D-Calif.) stated that she, along with Majority Leader [[Harry Reid]] (D-Nev.), “informed the president that they were opposed to increasing troop levels.” Both Pelosi and Reid expressed their disapproval in a letter to Bush on January 5, 2007, several days before the Bush's speech announcing the "surge" but after its content was leaked to the public.
+
  
On January 7, 2006, less than one week after she officially became [[House leadership|House Speaker]], Pelosi stated, “We will not abandon them...But if the president wants to add to this mission, he is going to have to justify it. And this is new for him because up until now the Republican Congress has given him a blank check with no oversight, no standards, no conditions.”<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/07/iraq.funding/index.html "Pelosi: No blank check for troop surge,"] ''CNN.'' January 7, 2007.</ref>
+
On January 7, 2006, less than one week after she officially became [[House leadership|House Speaker]], Pelosi stated, “We will not abandon them...But if the president wants to add to this mission, he is going to have to justify it. And this is new for him because up until now the Republican Congress has given him a blank check with no oversight, no standards, no conditions.”<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/07/iraq.funding/index.html "Pelosi: No blank check for troop surge,"] ''CNN.'' January 7, 2007.</ref>  
  
During the debate in mid-February 2007 of a nonbinding resolution opposing President Bush's troop "surge" in Iraq, Speaker Pelosi, who supported the measure, quoted former Ohio Sen. Robert Taft (R), who said, "Criticism in a time of war is essential to the maintenance of a democratic government" just weeks after the U.S. was bombed by Japanese forces at Pearl Harbor. The bill later passed on February 16 by a vote of 246-182. All but two Democrats, Reps. Gene Taylor (D-Miss.) and Jim Marshall (D-Ga.), voted in favor of the measure. Seventeen Republicans also supported it. Following the vote, Pelosi stated that the resolution would "signal a change in direction in Iraq that will end the fighting and bring our troops home."
+
During the debate in mid-February 2007 of a nonbinding resolution opposing President Bush's troop "surge" in Iraq, Speaker Pelosi, who supported the measure, quoted former Ohio Sen. Robert Taft (R), who said, "Criticism in a time of war is essential to the maintenance of a democratic government" just weeks after the U.S. was bombed by Japanese forces at Pearl Harbor. The bill later passed on February 16 by a vote of 246-182. All but two Democrats, Reps. [[Gene_Taylor|Gene Taylor]] (D-Miss.) and Jim Marshall (D-Ga.), voted in favor of the measure. Seventeen Republicans also supported it. Following the vote, Pelosi stated that the resolution would "signal a change in direction in Iraq that will end the fighting and bring our troops home."  
  
{{Main|Congressional actions regarding President Bush’s 2007 proposed troop “surge” in Iraq}}
+
{{Main|Congressional actions regarding President Bush’s 2007 proposed troop “surge” in Iraq}}  
  
====Opposes creation of Iraq oversight committee====
+
==== Opposes creation of Iraq oversight committee ====
  
On January 22, 2007, the [[House leadership|House Republican leadership]] sent a letter to Speaker Pelosi which proposed the creation of a new oversight committee to monitor the progress of [[George Walker Bush|President Bush's]] Iraq plan. The panel would have defined military, political and social benchmarks in which the president would be required to submit a report to the committee every 30 days indicating whether those benchmarks had been achieved. The committee would have also addressed troop withdrawal, which would have required “an interagency assessment on the impact withdrawal would have on our national security and homeland interest,” as well as the effect withdrawal would have had on surrounding countries.
+
On January 22, 2007, the [[House leadership|House Republican leadership]] sent a letter to Speaker Pelosi which proposed the creation of a new oversight committee to monitor the progress of [[George Walker Bush|President Bush's]] Iraq plan. The panel would have defined military, political and social benchmarks in which the president would be required to submit a report to the committee every 30 days indicating whether those benchmarks had been achieved. The committee would have also addressed troop withdrawal, which would have required “an interagency assessment on the impact withdrawal would have on our national security and homeland interest,” as well as the effect withdrawal would have had on surrounding countries.  
  
During a press conference, Minority Leader [[John Boehner]] (R-Ohio) stated that he believed congressional oversight of Bush’s new Iraq plan, including the decision to deploy more than 20,000 troops to the region, was necessary. He explained that, “I support the president’s plan, but we have a duty to candidly and honestly assess whether the new strategy will be effective and ultimately successful.”
+
During a press conference, Minority Leader [[John Boehner]] (R-Ohio) stated that he believed congressional oversight of Bush’s new Iraq plan, including the decision to deploy more than 20,000 troops to the region, was necessary. He explained that, “I support the president’s plan, but we have a duty to candidly and honestly assess whether the new strategy will be effective and ultimately successful.”  
  
The proposal was ultimately rejected by Pelosi, as she expressed confidence in the oversight ability of the already established committees. Her spokesman, Drew Hammill, stated that, “Committees in the [[110th Congress]] are already underway on Iraq oversight...She has the upmost confidence in their ability.”<ref>Jackie Kucinich. [http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/012307/iraq.html "House GOP proposes bipartisan Iraq oversight,"] ''The Hill.'' January 23, 2007.</ref>
+
The proposal was ultimately rejected by Pelosi, as she expressed confidence in the oversight ability of the already established committees. Her spokesman, Drew Hammill, stated that, “Committees in the [[110th Congress]] are already underway on Iraq oversight...She has the upmost confidence in their ability.”<ref>Jackie Kucinich. [http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/012307/iraq.html "House GOP proposes bipartisan Iraq oversight,"] ''The Hill.'' January 23, 2007.</ref>  
  
====Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act====
+
==== Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act ====
Pelosi strongly supported the '''Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act''' ([http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2956/show H.R. 2956]), which was sponsored by Rep. [[Ike Skelton]] (D-Mo.) on July 10, 2007. The bill would require that the U.S. begin redeploying troops from Iraq within 120 days of the bill's passage. It would also require that the U.S.  have a "limited presence" in Iraq by April 1, 2008. President Bush would need to submit a report to Congress outlining the specific goals of the remaining troops in Iraq, along with timetables for their completion. <ref>[http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2956/show "OpenCongress page on H.R.2956,"] ''OpenCongress.''</ref>
+
  
On July 12, 2007 the House passed the bill in a vote of 223-201.<ref>Mike Soraghan and Manu Raju. [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/key-vote-on-the-iraq-war-keeps-house-gop-united-2007-07-13.html  "Key vote on the Iraq war keeps House GOP united,"] ''The Hill.'' July 13, 2007.</ref>
+
Pelosi strongly supported the '''Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act''' ([http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2956/show H.R. 2956]), which was sponsored by Rep. [[Ike Skelton]] (D-Mo.) on July 10, 2007. The bill would require that the U.S. begin redeploying troops from Iraq within 120 days of the bill's passage. It would also require that the U.S. have a "limited presence" in Iraq by April 1, 2008. President Bush would need to submit a report to Congress outlining the specific goals of the remaining troops in Iraq, along with timetables for their completion. <ref>[http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h2956/show "OpenCongress page on H.R.2956,"] ''OpenCongress.''</ref>  
  
Before the vote, Pelosi called for a change in Iraq, saying,
+
On July 12, 2007 the House passed the bill in a vote of 223-201.<ref>Mike Soraghan and Manu Raju. [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/key-vote-on-the-iraq-war-keeps-house-gop-united-2007-07-13.html  "Key vote on the Iraq war keeps House GOP united,"] ''The Hill.'' July 13, 2007.</ref>  
<blockquote>“After more than 3,600 lives have been lost to a flawed strategy, we have a responsibility to create a new direction.</blockquote>
+
  
<blockquote>“After spending $329 million every day on the war in Iraq, on a war that is not making our country safer, we have an obligation to change course.</blockquote>
+
Before the vote, Pelosi called for a change in Iraq, saying,
 +
<blockquote>“After more than 3,600 lives have been lost to a flawed strategy, we have a responsibility to create a new direction.</blockquote> <blockquote>“After spending $329 million every day on the war in Iraq, on a war that is not making our country safer, we have an obligation to change course.</blockquote> <blockquote>“After five years of a failed policy in Iraq, we have a duty not just to voice our opposition, but to vote to end the war.</blockquote> <blockquote>“Chairman Skelton’s bipartisan bill offers a step we can take today toward bringing the troops home. To creating a strategic vision for stability in the Middle East, and for beginning to rearm our military."<ref>[http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/speeches?id=0059 "Pelosi Floor Statement on Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act,"] ''Speaker Nancy Pelosi.'' July 12, 2007.</ref></blockquote>
 +
{{main|Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act#Criticisms and commendations}}
  
<blockquote>“After five years of a failed policy in Iraq, we have a duty not just to voice our opposition, but to vote to end the war.</blockquote>
+
==== 2007 Iraq war spending bill ====
  
<blockquote>“Chairman Skelton’s bipartisan bill offers a step we can take today toward bringing the troops home. To creating a strategic vision for stability in the Middle East, and for beginning to rearm our military."<ref>[http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/speeches?id=0059 "Pelosi Floor Statement on Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act,"] ''Speaker Nancy Pelosi.'' July 12, 2007.</ref></blockquote>
+
On March 29, 2007, Speaker Pelosi urged President Bush to relax with threats of vetoing the House and Senate versions of the Iraq war supplemental bill. The legislation includes benchmarks and a 2008 withdrawal plan. If lawmakers cannot pass a bill with the president’s signature, it will lead to a shutdown of the Pentagon, effectively denying funding to troops in Iraq.<ref>Jonathan E. Kaplan. [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-tells-bush-to-calm-down-threats-2007-03-28.html "Pelosi tells Bush to ‘calm down threats’,"] ''The Hill.'' March 28, 2007.</ref>  
  
{{main|Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act#Criticisms and commendations}}
+
After the first Iraq supplemental spending bill, which included a timetable for troop withdrawal, passed the House in a 218-212 vote in March 2007, Pelosi stated, "proudly, this new Congress voted to bring an end to the war in Iraq." The bill was eventually passed by both chambers and sent to the President who vetoed it as promised. {{Main|U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Health, and Iraq Accountability Act, 2007 (H.R.1591)}}  
  
====2007 Iraq war spending bill====
+
Following the veto, another attempt was made an an Iraq supplemental spending bill, one that would most likely not include a troop withdrawal timetable. On May 10, Pelosi agreed to also hold a vote on an alternative measure (H.R.2237), sponsored by Rep. [[James McGovern]] (D-Mass.), which would mandate that U.S. combat troop withdrawal begin within three months, and that it be completed six months after that. Then, the bill mandated, no congressional money could be used for military operations (though there would be an allowance for certain types of special-ops activities). The alternative measure failed by a vote of 171-255. {{Main|U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (H.R.2206)}}
On March 29, 2007, Speaker Pelosi urged President Bush to relax with threats of vetoing the House and Senate versions of the Iraq war supplemental bill. The legislation includes benchmarks and a 2008 withdrawal plan. If lawmakers cannot pass a bill with the president’s signature, it will lead to a shutdown of the Pentagon, effectively denying funding to troops in Iraq.<ref>Jonathan E. Kaplan. [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-tells-bush-to-calm-down-threats-2007-03-28.html "Pelosi tells Bush to ‘calm down threats’,"] ''The Hill.'' March 28, 2007.</ref>
+
  
After the first Iraq supplemental spending bill, which included a timetable for troop withdrawal, passed the House in a 218-212 vote in March 2007, Pelosi stated, "proudly, this new Congress voted to bring an end to the war in Iraq." The bill was eventually passed by both chambers and sent to the President who vetoed it as promised.
+
On May 22, 2007, after numerous attempts at including timetables in an Iraq supplemental spending bill, Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate announced that they would each introduce supplemental spending bills which would not include timetables for combat withdrawal. Speaker Pelosi added, however, that the House bill would feature benchmarks with consequences, such as restricting reconstruction aid to Iraq if it could not meet certain goals. When the final bill, which provided funds for the Iraq War through September 2007, came to a vote, it passed 280-142, with most Democrats,including Pelosi, opposing it. {{Main|Congressional actions to end the Iraq War in the 110th Congress}}  
{{Main|U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Health, and Iraq Accountability Act, 2007 (H.R.1591)}}
+
  
Following the veto, another attempt was made an an Iraq supplemental spending bill, one that would most likely not include a troop withdrawal timetable. On May 10, Pelosi agreed to also hold a vote on an alternative measure (H.R.2237), sponsored by Rep. [[James McGovern]] (D-Mass.), which would mandate that U.S. combat troop withdrawal begin within three months, and that it be completed six months after that. Then, the bill mandated, no congressional money could be used for military operations (though there would be an allowance for certain types of special-ops activities). The alternative measure failed by a vote of 171-255.
+
=== Environmental record ===
{{Main|U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (H.R.2206)}}
+
  
On May 22, 2007, after numerous attempts at including timetables in an Iraq supplemental spending bill, Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate announced that they would each introduce supplemental spending bills which would not include timetables for combat withdrawal. Speaker Pelosi added, however, that the House bill would feature benchmarks with consequences, such as restricting reconstruction aid to Iraq if it could not meet certain goals. When the final bill, which provided funds for the Iraq War through September 2007, came to a vote, it passed 280-142, with most Democrats,including Pelosi, opposing it.
+
''For more information on environmental legislation, see the [[Portal:Energy and Environment Policy (U.S.)|Energy and Environment Policy Portal]]''
{{Main|Congressional actions to end the Iraq War in the 110th Congress}}
+
  
===Environmental record===
+
=== Transparency ===
''For more information on environmental legislation, see the [[Portal:Energy and Environment Policy (U.S.)|Energy and Environment Policy Portal]]''
+
  
===Transparency===
+
=== Progressive image ===
  
===Progressive image===
 
 
Pelosi is generally very progressive. She was a member of the [[Progressive Caucus]] until she became the party leader, when she adopted a policy of not belonging to any caucuses.<ref>Edward Epstein. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/07/05/MNGEQDJ4AA1.DTL "Liberal legislative caucus envisions post-Bush era,"] ''San Fransisco Chronicle.'' July 5, 2005.</ref>  
 
Pelosi is generally very progressive. She was a member of the [[Progressive Caucus]] until she became the party leader, when she adopted a policy of not belonging to any caucuses.<ref>Edward Epstein. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/07/05/MNGEQDJ4AA1.DTL "Liberal legislative caucus envisions post-Bush era,"] ''San Fransisco Chronicle.'' July 5, 2005.</ref>  
  
Like most House Democrats, Pelosi opposed the resolution authorizing Bush to use military force against Iraq. She has strongly criticized the war effort since then, and introduced an amendment to the FY 2006 Defense Appropriations bill calling on Bush to specify a strategy for success in Iraq, as well as a timetable for a safe withdrawal of American troops.
+
Like most House Democrats, Pelosi opposed the resolution authorizing Bush to use military force against Iraq. She has strongly criticized the war effort since then, and introduced an amendment to the FY 2006 Defense Appropriations bill calling on Bush to specify a strategy for success in Iraq, as well as a timetable for a safe withdrawal of American troops.  
  
Also, on July 31, 2006 Pelosi joined Senate Minority Leader [[Harry Reid]] (D-Nev.) in leading top congressional Democrats in signing a letter urging President Bush to start withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2006. The letter was signed by the twelve leading Democrats on the House and Senate committees handling armed services, foreign relations, intelligence and military spending.<ref>Charles Babington and Jim VandeHei. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/31/AR2006073100743.html "Hill Democrats Unite to Urge Bush to Begin Iraq Pullout,"] ''Washington Post.'' August 1, 2006.</ref>
+
Also, on July 31, 2006 Pelosi joined Senate Minority Leader [[Harry Reid]] (D-Nev.) in leading top congressional Democrats in signing a letter urging President Bush to start withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2006. The letter was signed by the twelve leading Democrats on the House and Senate committees handling armed services, foreign relations, intelligence and military spending.<ref>Charles Babington and Jim VandeHei. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/31/AR2006073100743.html "Hill Democrats Unite to Urge Bush to Begin Iraq Pullout,"] ''Washington Post.'' August 1, 2006.</ref>  
  
In March of 2006 Pelosi received the Unsung Hero Award from the American Legion for opposing a Bush Administration policy that would "deduct any additions to disabled veterans' benefits from their military pensions."<ref>Harold Meyerson. [http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=7699 "How Nancy Pelosi Took Control,"] ''The American Prospect.'' May 12, 2004.</ref>
+
In March of 2006 Pelosi received the Unsung Hero Award from the American Legion for opposing a Bush Administration policy that would "deduct any additions to disabled veterans' benefits from their military pensions."<ref>Harold Meyerson. [http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&amp;name=ViewPrint&amp;articleId=7699 "How Nancy Pelosi Took Control,"] ''The American Prospect.'' May 12, 2004.</ref>  
  
Despite receiving consistent criticism from left-leaning blogs Pelosi has been pushing her party to embrace new internet technologies, specifically blogs.<ref>[http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/041206/news4.html] ''The Hill.''</ref>
+
Despite receiving consistent criticism from left-leaning blogs Pelosi has been pushing her party to embrace new internet technologies, specifically blogs.<ref>[http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/041206/news4.html] ''The Hill.''</ref>  
  
===Refusal to take part in event honoring Reps. [[Randy "Duke" Cunningham]] and [[Tom DeLay]]===
+
=== Refusal to take part in event honoring Reps. [[Randy |Randy "Duke" Cunningham]] and [[Tom DeLay]] ===
  
On July 17, 2006, ''Roll Call'' reported that Pelosi was refusing to take part in a July 19 event hosted by the U.S. Capitol Historical Society. Thirty-seven departing members of Congress were to be honored, including former Reps. [[Tom DeLay]] (R-Texas) and [[Randy "Duke" Cunningham]] (R-Calif.). Pelosi defended her decision by saying that the two men, "have 'dishonored the House' and 'are unfit to to be honored for their service.'" When informed of Pelosi’s objections to having Cunningham’s name mentioned during the event, Speaker [[Dennis Hastert]] (R-Ill.) agreed, saying through a spokesman that, "it would be inappropriate to have a convicted felon on the honor roll." He did not indicate, however, that he agreed with regards to DeLay, who is awaiting a trial on conspiracy and money laundering charges.<ref>John Bresnahan. [http://www.rollcall.com/issues/52_6/news/14297-1.html "Pelosi Blasts Citations of DeLay, Cunningham,"] ''Roll Call.'' July 17, 2006.</ref>
+
On July 17, 2006, ''Roll Call'' reported that Pelosi was refusing to take part in a July 19 event hosted by the U.S. Capitol Historical Society. Thirty-seven departing members of Congress were to be honored, including former Reps. [[Tom DeLay]] (R-Texas) and [[Randy |Randy "Duke" Cunningham]] (R-Calif.). Pelosi defended her decision by saying that the two men, "have 'dishonored the House' and 'are unfit to to be honored for their service.'" When informed of Pelosi’s objections to having Cunningham’s name mentioned during the event, Speaker [[Dennis Hastert]] (R-Ill.) agreed, saying through a spokesman that, "it would be inappropriate to have a convicted felon on the honor roll." He did not indicate, however, that he agreed with regards to DeLay, who is awaiting a trial on conspiracy and money laundering charges.<ref>John Bresnahan. [http://www.rollcall.com/issues/52_6/news/14297-1.html "Pelosi Blasts Citations of DeLay, Cunningham,"] ''Roll Call.'' July 17, 2006.</ref>  
  
===Network neutrality legislation===
+
=== Network neutrality legislation ===
When Rep. [[Joe Barton]] and Sen. [[Ted Stevens]] pushed anti-[[network neutrality]] legislation in 2006, Pelosi came out in favor of neutrality, angering telecom companies and some fellow Democrats by urging her caucus to fall in line behind her. ''Roll Call'' also quoted "insiders" as saying that the damage telecom companies deal to Democrats in retaliation was low because they had already maxed out their campaign contributions to the legal limits until after the 2006 election.<ref>Tory Newmyer. [http://www.rollcall.com/issues/51_120/news/13267-1.html "Push by Pelosi Irks Telecoms,"] ''Roll Call.'' May 10, 2006.</ref>
+
  
===PAC Fined===
+
When Rep. [[Joe Barton]] and Sen. [[Ted Stevens]] pushed anti-[[Network neutrality]] legislation in 2006, Pelosi came out in favor of neutrality, angering telecom companies and some fellow Democrats by urging her caucus to fall in line behind her. ''Roll Call'' also quoted "insiders" as saying that the damage telecom companies deal to Democrats in retaliation was low because they had already maxed out their campaign contributions to the legal limits until after the 2006 election.<ref>Tory Newmyer. [http://www.rollcall.com/issues/51_120/news/13267-1.html "Push by Pelosi Irks Telecoms,"] ''Roll Call.'' May 10, 2006.</ref>  
In 2004 a political action committee (PAC), Team Majority, controlled by Pelosi was fined $21,000 for "for improperly accepting donations over federal limits, according to records and interviews."<ref>[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/state/california/2004-02-11-pelosi-pac-fined_x.htm "Pelosi PAC fined $21,000 by federal elections officials,"] ''USA Today.'' February 11, 2004.</ref> Pelosi used two PACs, including Team Majority, to raise money for her colleagues during the 2002 election. The fine came from Pelosi's use of multiple PACs to exceed donation limits to other members campaign committees. Two Democratic lawmakers, [[Chris Van Hollen]] (D-Md.) and [[Julie Thomas]] (D-Md.), paid fines of $2,500 each for receiving illegal contributions from Pelosi's PAC. Team Majority ceased operating before the fine was issued.<ref>[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/state/california/2004-02-11-pelosi-pac-fined_x.htm "Pelosi PAC fined $21,000 by federal elections officials,"] ''USA Today.'' February 11, 2004.</ref>
+
  
===[[Earmarks]] and "pork"===
+
=== PAC Fined ===
In February of 2003 the ''San Francisco Chronicle'' reported that Pelosi had sought a $1 million earmark for an advisor and former campaign treasurer's think tank:<ref>Edward Epstein. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/02/21/MN109779.DTL "Pelosi accused of pork-barrel politics,"] ''San Fransisco Chronicle.'' February 21, 2003.</ref>
+
  
:Pelosi's office confirmed Thursday that the San Francisco Democrat, who was elected House minority leader in November, obtained the $1 million for the USF center, without requiring [her longtime adviser and campaign treasurer, former Lt. Gov. Leo T.] McCarthy and USF to go through the normal application process for such grants. But Pelosi said the program got the money on its merits, not because of any political ties to the congresswoman.<ref>Edward Epstein. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/02/21/MN109779.DTL "Pelosi accused of pork-barrel politics,"] ''San Fransisco Chronicle.'' February 21, 2003.</ref></blockquote>
+
In 2004 a political action committee (PAC), Team Majority, controlled by Pelosi was fined $21,000 for "for improperly accepting donations over federal limits, according to records and interviews."<ref>[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/state/california/2004-02-11-pelosi-pac-fined_x.htm "Pelosi PAC fined $21,000 by federal elections officials,"] ''USA Today.'' February 11, 2004.</ref> Pelosi used two PACs, including Team Majority, to raise money for her colleagues during the 2002 election. The fine came from Pelosi's use of multiple PACs to exceed donation limits to other members campaign committees. Two Democratic lawmakers, [[Chris Van Hollen]] (D-Md.) and [[Julie Thomas]] (D-Md.), paid fines of $2,500 each for receiving illegal contributions from Pelosi's PAC. Team Majority ceased operating before the fine was issued.<ref>[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/state/california/2004-02-11-pelosi-pac-fined_x.htm "Pelosi PAC fined $21,000 by federal elections officials,"] ''USA Today.'' February 11, 2004.</ref>  
  
A 2005 ''Washington Times'' report alleges that Pelosi helped a campaign donor secure funds from a federal agency days after one of her staff members returned from a fact-finding trip to Spain that was funded by the donor.<ref>[http://www.gop.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=5332 "In Case You Missed It: Pelosi Helped Donor To PAC,"]''The Washington Times,'' (Accessed via ''GOP.com''). April 5, 2005.</ref>
+
=== [[Earmarks]] and "pork" ===
  
Pelosi and her office denied any connection between the trip and the money sought by WestStart-CALSTART. Pelosi's spokeswoman stated that Republican staffers also went on the trip to Spain.
+
In February of 2003 the ''San Francisco Chronicle'' reported that Pelosi had sought a $1 million earmark for an advisor and former campaign treasurer's think tank:<ref>Edward Epstein. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/02/21/MN109779.DTL "Pelosi accused of pork-barrel politics,"] ''San Fransisco Chronicle.'' February 21, 2003.</ref>
  
===Endorsement of Jack Murtha for Majority Leader===
+
:Pelosi's office confirmed Thursday that the San Francisco Democrat, who was elected House minority leader in November, obtained the $1 million for the USF center, without requiring [her longtime adviser and campaign treasurer, former Lt. Gov. Leo T.] McCarthy and USF to go through the normal application process for such grants. But Pelosi said the program got the money on its merits, not because of any political ties to the congresswoman.<ref>Edward Epstein. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/02/21/MN109779.DTL "Pelosi accused of pork-barrel politics,"] ''San Fransisco Chronicle.'' February 21, 2003.</ref>&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Following their victory in the 2006 midterm elections, congressional Democrats engaged in an intra-party struggle to determine who would be majority leader during the [[110th Congress]]. With Pelosi ascending to the Speakership, Rep. [[Steny Hoyer]] (Md.), then minority whip, appeared to be the most likely candidate for the position. Challenging him was Rep. [[John Murtha]] (Pa.), a close associate of Pelosi's and an early critic of the U.S. war in Iraq.  Pelosi intially vowed to stay neutral in the contest.  The Sunday before the Nov. 16th caucus elections, however, Pelosi surprised political observers by openly endorsing Murtha and throwing her full weight behind him, campaigning vigorously on his behalf.  This move was criticized in many circles as dividing the party when it was enjoying its largest success in recent year.  She also received criticism for backing Murtha for the number two position in what she had declared would be the cleanest Congress ever given his relation to a number of ethical scandals, particularly ABSCAM of the early 1980's. The campaign for the  position became exceptionally heated, with Hoyer's supporters in particular accusing Murtha's camp of strong arm tactics.  Hoyer ultimately prevailed by a vote of 149-86.<ref>Jonathan Weisman and Lois Romano. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/15/AR2006111501521.html "Pelosi Splits Democrats With Push For Murtha,"] ''Washington Post.'' November 16, 2006.</ref><ref>Jonathan Weisman and Lois Romano. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/16/AR2006111600514.html "Democrats Pick Hoyer Over Murtha,"] ''Washington Post.'' November 17, 2007.</ref>
+
  
====Continued hostilities with Majority Leader Steny Hoyer====
+
A 2005 ''Washington Times'' report alleges that Pelosi helped a campaign donor secure funds from a federal agency days after one of her staff members returned from a fact-finding trip to Spain that was funded by the donor.<ref>[http://www.gop.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=5332 "In Case You Missed It: Pelosi Helped Donor To PAC,"]''The Washington Times,'' (Accessed via ''GOP.com''). April 5, 2005.</ref>  
On February 12, 2007, hostilities between Pelosi and [[House leadership|Majority Leader]] [[Steny Hoyer]] (D-Md.) heightened again after an aide in Pelosi's office said Hoyer had been "getting out in front" of a widespread consensus against allowing Republicans to introduce an alternative resolution on the Iraq war.<ref>Jonathan E. Kaplan. [http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/021307/odds.html "Pelosi, Hoyer at odds again,"] ''The Hill.'' February 13, 2007.</ref>
+
  
Hoyer, on February 8, 2007, said to reporters that "Republicans would be allowed a motion to recommit or an amendment to the Democratic resolution." But then subsequently that day on the House floor, said it would be "unlikely that the GOP would get any such alternative."<ref>Jonathan E. Kaplan. [http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/021307/odds.html "Pelosi, Hoyer at odds again,"] ''The Hill.'' February 13, 2007.</ref>
+
Pelosi and her office denied any connection between the trip and the money sought by WestStart-CALSTART. Pelosi's spokeswoman stated that Republican staffers also went on the trip to Spain.  
  
Hoyer's allies deny any split in leadership. However, the episode did suggest that tensions between Pelosi and Hoyer from prior disputes have not been dispelled. The most notable, although unsuccessful, seen in Pelosi's push for [[John Murtha]] (D-Pa.) as majority leader in December.<ref>Jonathan E. Kaplan. [http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/021307/odds.html "Pelosi, Hoyer at odds again,"] ''The Hill.'' February 13, 2007.</ref>
+
=== Endorsement of Jack Murtha for Majority Leader ===
  
===National security and foreign policy===
+
Following their victory in the 2006 midterm elections, congressional Democrats engaged in an intra-party struggle to determine who would be majority leader during the [[110th Congress]]. With Pelosi ascending to the Speakership, Rep. [[Steny Hoyer]] (Md.), then minority whip, appeared to be the most likely candidate for the position. Challenging him was Rep. [[John Murtha]] (Pa.), a close associate of Pelosi's and an early critic of the U.S. war in Iraq. Pelosi intially vowed to stay neutral in the contest. The Sunday before the Nov. 16th caucus elections, however, Pelosi surprised political observers by openly endorsing Murtha and throwing her full weight behind him, campaigning vigorously on his behalf. This move was criticized in many circles as dividing the party when it was enjoying its largest success in recent year. She also received criticism for backing Murtha for the number two position in what she had declared would be the cleanest Congress ever given his relation to a number of ethical scandals, particularly ABSCAM of the early 1980's. The campaign for the position became exceptionally heated, with Hoyer's supporters in particular accusing Murtha's camp of strong arm tactics. Hoyer ultimately prevailed by a vote of 149-86.<ref>Jonathan Weisman and Lois Romano. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/15/AR2006111501521.html "Pelosi Splits Democrats With Push For Murtha,"] ''Washington Post.'' November 16, 2006.</ref><ref>Jonathan Weisman and Lois Romano. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/16/AR2006111600514.html "Democrats Pick Hoyer Over Murtha,"] ''Washington Post.'' November 17, 2007.</ref>  
====Against an invasion of Iran====
+
In February 2007, at the House Democratic annual retreat, Speaker Pelosi informed her colleagues that "if it appears likely that Bush wants to take the country to war against Iran, the House would take up a bill to deny him the authority to do so."<ref>Michael Abramowitz and Paul Kane. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/03/AR2007020300701.html "At Democrats' Meeting, Bush Appeals for Cooperation,"] ''Washington Post.'' February 4, 2007.</ref>
+
  
====Trip to the Middle East====
+
==== Continued hostilities with Majority Leader Steny Hoyer ====
Despite vocal disapproval from the White House, Pelosi embarked on a nine-day goodwill trip to the Middle East in late March 2007.  Pelosi planned to address several parliaments and heads of state, including [[Syria]].  Reps. [[Tom Lantos]] (D-Calif.), [[Henry Waxman]] (D-Calif.), [[Louise Slaughter]] (D-N.Y.) [[Nick Rahall]] (D-W.Va.), [[David Hobson]] (R-Ohio) and [[Keith Ellison]] (D-Minn.) are accompanying her. The trip to Syria goes against White House recommendations of avoiding the country due to, what the White House calls, [[state-sponsored terrorism]]. The White House criticized the message that Pelosi’s stop would send to U.S. allies.<ref>Chris Good, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosis-expected-trip-to-syria-meets-white-house-disapproval-2007-03-30.html "White House disapproves of Pelosi's Syria trip,"] ''The Hill'', March 30, 2007.</ref>
+
  
''Think Progress'', however, stated that at the time the White House was making those comments it exempted from criticism three congressional Republicans &mdash; Reps. [[Robert Aderholt]] (R-Ala.), [[Joe Pitts]] (R-Penn.) and [[Frank Wolf]] (R-Va.)<ref>Helen Cooper and Carl Hulse, [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/07/washington/07diplo.html?_r=1&bl&ex=1176177600&en=af8e1a23dd23c51f&ei=5087%0A&oref=slogin "As One Syria Trip Draws Fire, Others Draw Silence,"] ''New York Times'', April 7, 2007</ref> &mdash; who were then on a similar trip to [[Israel]] and Syria. Also, the ''Associated Press'' reported that in March 2007, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State [[Ellen Sauerbrey]] had traveled to Syria to hold talks with a "senior Syrian diplomat on how Damascus was coping with a flood of Iraqi refugees, the first such talks in the Syrian capital for more than two years." <ref>[http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/30/syria-hypocrisy/ "Exclusive: Republican Delegation Currently Visiting Syria, Spared From White House Attacks,"] ''Think Progress'', March 30, 2007.</ref>  
+
On February 12, 2007, hostilities between Pelosi and [[House leadership|Majority Leader]] [[Steny Hoyer]] (D-Md.) heightened again after an aide in Pelosi's office said Hoyer had been "getting out in front" of a widespread consensus against allowing Republicans to introduce an alternative resolution on the Iraq war.<ref>Jonathan E. Kaplan. [http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/021307/odds.html "Pelosi, Hoyer at odds again,"] ''The Hill.'' February 13, 2007.</ref>  
  
White House spokesperson Dana Perino had the following exchange with a reporter on April 3, 2007, when asked about the difference between how the White House treated the two trips:
+
Hoyer, on February 8, 2007, said to reporters that "Republicans would be allowed a motion to recommit or an amendment to the Democratic resolution." But then subsequently that day on the House floor, said it would be "unlikely that the GOP would get any such alternative."<ref>Jonathan E. Kaplan. [http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/021307/odds.html "Pelosi, Hoyer at odds again,"] ''The Hill.'' February 13, 2007.</ref>  
<blockquote>
+
QUESTION: I want to clarify on the -- you're saying it was a bad idea, then, for Speaker Pelosi to go for all these various reasons to Syria. It's a bad idea, then, for [[Jim Baker]] to have gone, a bad idea for Frank Wolf to go as well, right?<br><br>
+
  
MS. PERINO: We think that it is not a good idea for U.S. officials to go and meet with Assad, because it alleviates that pressure, and also because meetings haven't produced anything. They've been meeting just to meet, and he doesn't change his behavior. In fact, he uses those meetings as a reason to say that he doesn't need to do anything. <ref>Josh Marshall, [http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/013423.php blog post,] ''TalkingPointsMemo.com'', April 3, 2007.</ref></blockquote>  
+
Hoyer's allies deny any split in leadership. However, the episode did suggest that tensions between Pelosi and Hoyer from prior disputes have not been dispelled. The most notable, although unsuccessful, seen in Pelosi's push for [[John Murtha]] (D-Pa.) as majority leader in December.<ref>Jonathan E. Kaplan. [http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/021307/odds.html "Pelosi, Hoyer at odds again,"] ''The Hill.'' February 13, 2007.</ref>  
  
Pelosi held talks with the Syrian president on April 4, 2007 on Syrian-Israeli relations and Syrian support of militant groups. <ref>[http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2007-04-04-pelosi-syria_N.htm "Pelosi, Syrian president meet,"] ''USA Today'', April 4, 2007.</ref>
+
=== National security and foreign policy ===
  
A "day after the Pelosi delegation", on April 5, 2007, Rep. [[Darrell Issa]] (R-Calif.), a Lebanese-American "who frequently travels to the Middle East"<ref>[http://www.azstarnet.com/news/177141 "Republican congressman meets with Syria's Assad,"] Associated Press, April 6, 2007</ref>, "headed a 3 person delegation"<ref>[http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=5030&sectionid=3510202 "U.S. Congressmen meets with Syria's President Assad,"] ''PressTV.ir'', April 5, 2007</ref><ref>[http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/2007/04/republican_memb_1.php "Republican member of US Congress meets Syria's Assad,"] ''Yalibnan.com'', April 6, 2007</ref> that visited Syria and met with Assad and Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem.<ref>Carla Marinucci, [http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/10/BAGV9P6C0S6.DTL "Pelosi, Lantos may be interested in diplomatic trip to Iran,"] ''San Franciso Chronicle'', April 10, 2007</ref><ref>[http://www.payvand.com/news/07/apr/1065.html "Republican Congressman Visits Syria After Controversial Pelosi Trip,"] [[Voice of America]] News, April 6, 2007</ref>
+
==== Against an invasion of Iran ====
  
On April 5, 2007, in a telephone interview with [[Rush Limbaugh]]<ref>Helen Cooper and Carl Hulse, [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/07/washington/07diplo.html?_r=1&bl&ex=1176177600&en=af8e1a23dd23c51f&ei=5087%0A&oref=slogin "As One Syria Trip Draws Fire, Others Draw Silence,"] ''New York Times'', April 7, 2007</ref>, Vice President [[Dick Cheney]] criticized Pelosi's statements to the Syrian president as "nonsensical" and constituting "bad behavior."  This criticism was, in part, a response to Pelosi conveying that Israel was open to peace talks with Syria which prompted Israel to clarify the pre-conditions to peace talks. <ref>Mike Soraghan, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/cheney-pelosis-syria-visit-constitutes-bad-behavior-2007-04-05.html "Cheney: Pelosi’s Syria visit constitutes ‘bad behavior’,"] ''The Hill'', April 5, 2007.</ref>
+
In February 2007, at the House Democratic annual retreat, Speaker Pelosi informed her colleagues that "if it appears likely that Bush wants to take the country to war against Iran, the House would take up a bill to deny him the authority to do so."<ref>Michael Abramowitz and Paul Kane. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/03/AR2007020300701.html "At Democrats' Meeting, Bush Appeals for Cooperation,"] ''Washington Post.'' February 4, 2007.</ref>  
  
On April 8, 2007, former Speaker of the House [[Newt Gingrich]] criticised Pelosi's trip as "dangerous for America", stating that it is "very important not to have two foreign policies." <ref>Chris Good, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/gingrich-criticizes-pelosi-over-syria-visit-2007-04-08.html "Gingrich criticizes Pelosi over Syria visit,"] ''The Hill'', April 8, 2007.</ref>
+
==== Trip to the Middle East ====
 +
 
 +
Despite vocal disapproval from the White House, Pelosi embarked on a nine-day goodwill trip to the Middle East in late March 2007. Pelosi planned to address several parliaments and heads of state, including [[Syria]]. Reps. [[Tom Lantos]] (D-Calif.), [[Henry Waxman]] (D-Calif.), [[Louise Slaughter]] (D-N.Y.) [[Nick Rahall]] (D-W.Va.), [[David Hobson]] (R-Ohio) and [[Keith Ellison]] (D-Minn.) are accompanying her. The trip to Syria goes against White House recommendations of avoiding the country due to, what the White House calls, [[State-sponsored terrorism]]. The White House criticized the message that Pelosi’s stop would send to U.S. allies.<ref>Chris Good, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosis-expected-trip-to-syria-meets-white-house-disapproval-2007-03-30.html "White House disapproves of Pelosi's Syria trip,"] ''The Hill'', March 30, 2007.</ref>
 +
 
 +
''Think Progress'', however, stated that at the time the White House was making those comments it exempted from criticism three congressional Republicans — Reps. [[Robert Aderholt]] (R-Ala.), [[Joe Pitts]] (R-Penn.) and [[Frank Wolf]] (R-Va.)<ref>Helen Cooper and Carl Hulse, [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/07/washington/07diplo.html?_r=1&amp;bl&amp;ex=1176177600&amp;en=af8e1a23dd23c51f&amp;ei=5087%0A&amp;oref=slogin "As One Syria Trip Draws Fire, Others Draw Silence,"] ''New York Times'', April 7, 2007</ref> — who were then on a similar trip to [[Israel]] and Syria. Also, the ''Associated Press'' reported that in March 2007, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State [[Ellen Sauerbrey]] had traveled to Syria to hold talks with a "senior Syrian diplomat on how Damascus was coping with a flood of Iraqi refugees, the first such talks in the Syrian capital for more than two years." <ref>[http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/30/syria-hypocrisy/ "Exclusive: Republican Delegation Currently Visiting Syria, Spared From White House Attacks,"] ''Think Progress'', March 30, 2007.</ref>
 +
 
 +
White House spokesperson Dana Perino had the following exchange with a reporter on April 3, 2007, when asked about the difference between how the White House treated the two trips:
 +
<blockquote>QUESTION: I want to clarify on the -- you're saying it was a bad idea, then, for Speaker Pelosi to go for all these various reasons to Syria. It's a bad idea, then, for [[Jim Baker]] to have gone, a bad idea for Frank Wolf to go as well, right?<br><br> MS. PERINO: We think that it is not a good idea for U.S. officials to go and meet with Assad, because it alleviates that pressure, and also because meetings haven't produced anything. They've been meeting just to meet, and he doesn't change his behavior. In fact, he uses those meetings as a reason to say that he doesn't need to do anything. <ref>Josh Marshall, [http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/013423.php blog post,] ''TalkingPointsMemo.com'', April 3, 2007.</ref></blockquote>
 +
Pelosi held talks with the Syrian president on April 4, 2007 on Syrian-Israeli relations and Syrian support of militant groups. <ref>[http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2007-04-04-pelosi-syria_N.htm "Pelosi, Syrian president meet,"] ''USA Today'', April 4, 2007.</ref>
 +
 
 +
A "day after the Pelosi delegation", on April 5, 2007, Rep. [[Darrell Issa]] (R-Calif.), a Lebanese-American "who frequently travels to the Middle East"<ref>[http://www.azstarnet.com/news/177141 "Republican congressman meets with Syria's Assad,"] Associated Press, April 6, 2007</ref>, "headed a 3 person delegation"<ref>[http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=5030&amp;sectionid=3510202 "U.S. Congressmen meets with Syria's President Assad,"] ''PressTV.ir'', April 5, 2007</ref><ref>[http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/2007/04/republican_memb_1.php "Republican member of US Congress meets Syria's Assad,"] ''Yalibnan.com'', April 6, 2007</ref> that visited Syria and met with Assad and Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem.<ref>Carla Marinucci, [http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/10/BAGV9P6C0S6.DTL "Pelosi, Lantos may be interested in diplomatic trip to Iran,"] ''San Franciso Chronicle'', April 10, 2007</ref><ref>[http://www.payvand.com/news/07/apr/1065.html "Republican Congressman Visits Syria After Controversial Pelosi Trip,"] [[Voice of America]] News, April 6, 2007</ref>
 +
 
 +
On April 5, 2007, in a telephone interview with [[Rush Limbaugh]]<ref>Helen Cooper and Carl Hulse, [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/07/washington/07diplo.html?_r=1&amp;bl&amp;ex=1176177600&amp;en=af8e1a23dd23c51f&amp;ei=5087%0A&amp;oref=slogin "As One Syria Trip Draws Fire, Others Draw Silence,"] ''New York Times'', April 7, 2007</ref>, Vice President [[Dick Cheney]] criticized Pelosi's statements to the Syrian president as "nonsensical" and constituting "bad behavior." This criticism was, in part, a response to Pelosi conveying that Israel was open to peace talks with Syria which prompted Israel to clarify the pre-conditions to peace talks. <ref>Mike Soraghan, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/cheney-pelosis-syria-visit-constitutes-bad-behavior-2007-04-05.html "Cheney: Pelosi’s Syria visit constitutes ‘bad behavior’,"] ''The Hill'', April 5, 2007.</ref>
 +
 
 +
On April 8, 2007, former Speaker of the House [[Newt Gingrich]] criticised Pelosi's trip as "dangerous for America", stating that it is "very important not to have two foreign policies." <ref>Chris Good, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/gingrich-criticizes-pelosi-over-syria-visit-2007-04-08.html "Gingrich criticizes Pelosi over Syria visit,"] ''The Hill'', April 8, 2007.</ref>  
 +
 
 +
==== Views on Israel ====
  
====Views on Israel====
 
 
Pelosi addressed the 2005 Policy Conference of the [[American Israel Public Affairs Committee]]. In her speech she said that the root of the Israel-Palestine conflict is the right of Israel to exist, not the occupation of Palestine, and pledged the protection of the U.S.:  
 
Pelosi addressed the 2005 Policy Conference of the [[American Israel Public Affairs Committee]]. In her speech she said that the root of the Israel-Palestine conflict is the right of Israel to exist, not the occupation of Palestine, and pledged the protection of the U.S.:  
  
 
:""There are those who contend that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is all about Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. This is absolute nonsense. In truth, the history of the conflict is not over occupation, and never has been: it is over the fundamental right of Israel to exist... The United States will stand with Israel now and forever. Now and forever."{{ref|aipac}}
 
:""There are those who contend that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is all about Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. This is absolute nonsense. In truth, the history of the conflict is not over occupation, and never has been: it is over the fundamental right of Israel to exist... The United States will stand with Israel now and forever. Now and forever."{{ref|aipac}}
  
In July 2006, she threatened to boycott the speech by the Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Malaki to the joint session of congress unless he repudiated his earlier criticism of Israeli aggression against Lebanon.<ref>[http://fanonite.org/2007/03/14/pacing-in-the-marionettes-aipacs-annual-conference/ "PACing in the Marionettes,"] ''The Fanonite.'' March 14, 2007.</ref>
+
In July 2006, she threatened to boycott the speech by the Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Malaki to the joint session of congress unless he repudiated his earlier criticism of Israeli aggression against Lebanon.<ref>[http://fanonite.org/2007/03/14/pacing-in-the-marionettes-aipacs-annual-conference/ "PACing in the Marionettes,"] ''The Fanonite.'' March 14, 2007.</ref>  
  
Beginning August 8, 1991, Nancy Pelosi went on a tour of Israel as part of an [[Anti-Defamation League]] of B'nai B'rith congressional mission. The other congressmen on the tour were: [[Leon Panetta]], [[George Miller]] and [[Charles Schumer]].
+
Beginning August 8, 1991, Nancy Pelosi went on a tour of Israel as part of an [[Anti-Defamation League]] of B'nai B'rith congressional mission. The other congressmen on the tour were: [[Leon Panetta]], [[George Miller]] and [[Charles Schumer]].  
  
Pelosi has strong ties to a number of Jewish groups, including the [[American Israel Public Affairs Committee]] whose former preident [[Amy Friedkin]] is her close friend.<ref>Jennifer Jacobson. [http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/news/article/20061108Pelosi8217ssuppo.html "For Pelosi, Israel is personal,"] ''JTA.'' November 8, 2006.</ref>
+
Pelosi has strong ties to a number of Jewish groups, including the [[American Israel Public Affairs Committee]] whose former preident [[Amy Friedkin]] is her close friend.<ref>Jennifer Jacobson. [http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/news/article/20061108Pelosi8217ssuppo.html "For Pelosi, Israel is personal,"] ''JTA.'' November 8, 2006.</ref>  
  
*Nancy Pelosi speech to [http://www.corkpsc.org/db.php?aid=2405 AIPAC April 2003]
+
*Nancy Pelosi speech to [http://www.corkpsc.org/db.php?aid=2405 AIPAC April 2003]  
 
*Nancy Pelosi speech to [http://www.corkpsc.org/db.php?aid=19430 AIPAC May 2005]
 
*Nancy Pelosi speech to [http://www.corkpsc.org/db.php?aid=19430 AIPAC May 2005]
  
====Applauds President Bush for tightening sanctions against Sudan====
+
==== Applauds President Bush for tightening sanctions against Sudan ====
On May 29, 2007, Pelosi applauded a decision by President Bush to tighten sanctions against the government of Sudan. Bush's plan called for increasing economic and political pressure on Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir to end an ongoing genocide in the country's Darfur region. Pelosi stated “The president’s decision to impose tougher economic sanctions on Sudan was the right one...It has been three years since the Bush administration correctly termed the conditions in Darfur as ‘genocide’ and it is long past time for all countries concerned by the suffering that continues in Darfur to take the steps necessary to end it.”<ref>Kara Oppenheim, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-praises-bush-for-tightening-sudan-sanctions-2007-05-29.html "Pelosi praises Bush for tightening Sudan sanctions,"] ''The Hill'', May 29, 2007.</ref>
+
  
====9/11 Commission recommendations====
+
On May 29, 2007, Pelosi applauded a decision by President Bush to tighten sanctions against the government of Sudan. Bush's plan called for increasing economic and political pressure on Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir to end an ongoing genocide in the country's Darfur region. Pelosi stated “The president’s decision to impose tougher economic sanctions on Sudan was the right one...It has been three years since the Bush administration correctly termed the conditions in Darfur as ‘genocide’ and it is long past time for all countries concerned by the suffering that continues in Darfur to take the steps necessary to end it.”<ref>Kara Oppenheim, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-praises-bush-for-tightening-sudan-sanctions-2007-05-29.html "Pelosi praises Bush for tightening Sudan sanctions,"] ''The Hill'', May 29, 2007.</ref>
In January 2007, while attempting to pass legislation as part of the Democrat's "First 100 Hours" agenda regarding implementing the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, Speaker Pelosi, admitting to difficult passage in the Senate due to high costs, estimated that the costs for implementing inspections for 100 percent of air cargo alone would cost $3.6 to $6 billion annually.
+
{{Main|Congressional efforts to implement recommendations of the 9/11 commission}}
+
  
===No smoking in the Speaker's lobby===
+
==== 9/11 Commission recommendations ====
  
On January 10, 2007, Pelosi banned smoking from the Speaker's Lobby, saying, "The days of smoke-filled rooms in the United States Capitol are over...Medical science has unquestionably established the dangerous effects of secondhand smoke, including an increased risk of cancer and respiratory diseases. I am a firm believer that Congress should lead by example." Pelosi's ban did not prohibit lawmakers from smoking in their own offices.<ref>Erica Werner. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011000584.html "Pelosi Bans Smoking Near House Floor,"] ''Washington Post.'' January 10, 2007.</ref>
+
In January 2007, while attempting to pass legislation as part of the Democrat's "First 100 Hours" agenda regarding implementing the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, Speaker Pelosi, admitting to difficult passage in the Senate due to high costs, estimated that the costs for implementing inspections for 100 percent of air cargo alone would cost $3.6 to $6 billion annually. {{Main|Congressional efforts to implement recommendations of the 9/11 commission}}
  
===Congressional air travel===
+
=== No smoking in the Speaker's lobby ===
====Flight compensation====
+
In March 2007, a liaison from Speaker Pelosi met with Minority Leader [[John Boehner]]'s (R-Ohio) office in order to amend the House rules regarding compensation for Congressional air travel. The rules were changed in January, requiring Congressmen to pay non-commercial aircraft owners the full price of a ticket, which the FAA rules prohibit. While this has prevented Members from using lobbyists aircraft, it also grounded several personal aircraft amongst Democratic and Republican Lawmakers. Pelosi was attempting to change the rules via voice-vote, (which required unanimous consent) but Boehner has refused to consider "piecemeal changes" and was holding out for other Rules changes regarding earmarks.
+
  
Eventually, on May 2 2007, the House voted by voice vote on H.R.363 to remove airplane travel restrictions. The measure was sponsored by Rep. [[Collin Peterson]] (D-Minn.) and Rep. [[Samuel Graves]] (R-Mo.). The new rules allow members to fly in a friend's airplane for free. The rules change also provides that members who are certified pilots may again fly their own aircraft.  
+
On January 10, 2007, Pelosi banned smoking from the Speaker's Lobby, saying, "The days of smoke-filled rooms in the United States Capitol are over...Medical science has unquestionably established the dangerous effects of secondhand smoke, including an increased risk of cancer and respiratory diseases. I am a firm believer that Congress should lead by example." Pelosi's ban did not prohibit lawmakers from smoking in their own offices.<ref>Erica Werner. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011000584.html "Pelosi Bans Smoking Near House Floor,"] ''Washington Post.'' January 10, 2007.</ref>
{{main|U.S. federal ethics, transparency, and campaign finance legislation, 110th Congress}}
+
  
====Use of Air Force transportation====
+
=== Congressional air travel ===
In early February 2007, [[U.S. Department of Defense|Department of Defense]] officials criticized Pelosi for using Air Force transportation in extravagance.  Pelosi admitted to using a C-32 to fly coast to coast (from Washington to San Francisco) without refueling, but claims that she did not request the military version of a Boeing-757 specifically.  Pelosi further claimed that the criticism was a retributive attack for her past criticism of [[Donald Rumsfeld]] and the war in Iraq.  On February 8, 2007, White House spokesman [[Tony Snow]] called the affair "silly" and "unfair to the speaker."<ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17035721/ "House sergeant-at-arms ordered Pelosi plane,"] ''MSNBC.'' February 8, 2007.</ref>
+
  
===Immigration===
+
==== Flight compensation ====
On May 20th 2007, Speaker Pelosi issued a series of criticisms regarding the Senate's immigration bill. Specifically, she mentioned the 'point system' of the guest worker program and that it was anti-family. She stated, "the family unification principles which had been fundamental to American immigration are disrupted by what is in there now.”<ref>Jeremy Jacobs, [http://hill6.thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-lays-out-criticism-of-immigration-bill-2007-05-20.html "Pelosi lays out criticism of immigration bill"] ''The Hill'', May 20, 2007.</ref>
+
  
{{main|U.S. immigration legislation}}<br>
+
In March 2007, a liaison from Speaker Pelosi met with Minority Leader [[John Boehner]]'s (R-Ohio) office in order to amend the House rules regarding compensation for Congressional air travel. The rules were changed in January, requiring Congressmen to pay non-commercial aircraft owners the full price of a ticket, which the FAA rules prohibit. While this has prevented Members from using lobbyists aircraft, it also grounded several personal aircraft amongst Democratic and Republican Lawmakers. Pelosi was attempting to change the rules via voice-vote, (which required unanimous consent) but Boehner has refused to consider "piecemeal changes" and was holding out for other Rules changes regarding earmarks.  
  
===Peru-United States Free Trade Agreement deal===
+
Eventually, on May 2 2007, the House voted by voice vote on H.R.363 to remove airplane travel restrictions. The measure was sponsored by Rep. [[Collin Peterson]] (D-Minn.) and Rep. [[Samuel Graves]] (R-Mo.). The new rules allow members to fly in a friend's airplane for free. The rules change also provides that members who are certified pilots may again fly their own aircraft. {{main|U.S. federal ethics, transparency, and campaign finance legislation, 110th Congress}}
On May 10, 2007, Democratic congressional leaders, including House Speaker [[Nancy Pelosi]] (D-Calif.) and [[House Committee on Ways and Means]] Chair [[Charles Rangel]] (D-N.Y.), struck a deal with President Bush that secured their support for the Peru-U.S. agreement in exchange for inserting provisions that protect workers' rights to organize and bargain collectively. The Peruvian government would also have to agree to the changes before Congress could consider the agreement.<ref>Doug Palmer, [http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWBT00695620070511?feedType=RSS "Democrats, Bush strike deal on trade,"] ''Reuters'', May 11, 2007.</ref>
+
  
{{main|Peru-United States Free Trade Agreement}}<br>
+
==== Use of Air Force transportation ====
  
===Ethics reform===
+
In early February 2007, [[U.S. Department of Defense|Department of Defense]] officials criticized Pelosi for using Air Force transportation in extravagance. Pelosi admitted to using a C-32 to fly coast to coast (from Washington to San Francisco) without refueling, but claims that she did not request the military version of a Boeing-757 specifically. Pelosi further claimed that the criticism was a retributive attack for her past criticism of [[Donald Rumsfeld]] and the war in Iraq. On February 8, 2007, White House spokesman [[Tony Snow]] called the affair "silly" and "unfair to the speaker."<ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17035721/ "House sergeant-at-arms ordered Pelosi plane,"] ''MSNBC.'' February 8, 2007.</ref>
After emerging victorious in the November 7, 2006 elections Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi pledged "to lead the most honest, the most open and the most ethical Congress in history." Pelosi also pledged to sever the ties between K Street, the Washington corridor of lobbying firms, and Congress. As incoming Speaker, Pelosi also stated that she would push to make the sponsors of congressional earmarks public prior to votes. She stated, "There has to be transparency ... I'd just as soon do away with all (earmarks), but that probably isn't realistic."
+
  
====Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2006====
+
=== Immigration ===
Minority Leader Pelosi introduced '''The Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2006''' on January 20, 2006, in the wake of numerous guilty pleas by and indictments of lobbyists and members of Congress. Specifically, the bill would:
+
* Ban lobbyists from giving gifts or travel to members or their staff.
+
* Require lobbyists to file electronic, quarterly reports. The report must contain information pertaining to efforts to stimulate grassroots support, previous work in the executive or legislative branches, and provide certification of the report with the possibility of criminal penalties for failing to submit a certified report. The bill also creates a searchable public database of lobbying reports.
+
* Double the "cooling-off" period where lawmakers, staff, and Executive branch employees cannot lobby there former offices of employment from one-year to two-years.
+
* Stop efforts like the "K Street Project" by banning efforts of members of Congress and staff to enforce partisan discipline in private organizations. The penalty would be a fine or up to 15 years in prison with a possible ban on serving public office.
+
* Require lawmakers, staff, and Executive employees to disclose outside job negotiations and to receive approval from the Office of Government Ethics.
+
* Require conference committees to be open to the public and require conference reports to be publicly available on the Internet at least 24 hours prior to a vote.
+
* Require that any appointee to a public safety position have proven credentials and training in one or more areas that are relevant.
+
* Provide oversight of government contracting. Require contractors to work for contracts in an open, competitive bidding process. Create stiffer penalties for wartime fraud and prohibit contractors with conflicts of interest from participating in competitive bidding.
+
The bill was referred to six committees, Judiciary, Rules, Government Reform, Standards and Conduct, Armed Services, and Administration, and failed to emerge from any one of the six.
+
  
====Independent ethics commission====
+
On May 20th 2007, Speaker Pelosi issued a series of criticisms regarding the Senate's immigration bill. Specifically, she mentioned the 'point system' of the guest worker program and that it was anti-family. She stated, "the family unification principles which had been fundamental to American immigration are disrupted by what is in there now.”<ref>Jeremy Jacobs, [http://hill6.thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-lays-out-criticism-of-immigration-bill-2007-05-20.html "Pelosi lays out criticism of immigration bill"] ''The Hill'', May 20, 2007.</ref>
On February 1, 2007, Speaker Pelosi and House Minority Leader [[John Boehner]] (R-Ohio) announced the creation of a "task force" to study implementation of an outside ethics body to oversee Congress. The task force, chaired by Rep. [[Michael Capuano]] (D-Mass.), issued it's report to the House in May 2007.
+
  
On June 1, 2007, Pelosi announced her intention to create an independent ethics commission that would allow outside groups to file complaints against members of Congress, which previously could only be filed by other members. The commission, as proposed by a special task force chaired by Rep. [[Michael Capuano]] (D-Mass.), could filter complaints but have no judging authority.<ref>Mike Soraghan, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-committed-to-allowing-outside-groups-file-ethics-complaints-2007-06-01.html "Pelosi committed to allowing outside groups file ethics complaints,"] ''The Hill'', June 1, 2007.</ref> Implementation of the new commission was delayed, however, as many members were worried by the ability of non-members to submit complaints, fearing the change would be abused with politically motivated attacks. Fifty-three House members signed onto an alternative piece of ethics legislation, introduced by Rep. [[Baron Hill]] (D-Ind.), which would create a powerful investigative panel consisting of 12 former representatives, but would only allow complaints from sitting members. According to advocates familiar with the proposal in the House, the ethics panel would include the following components:
+
{{main|U.S. immigration legislation}}<br>  
  
* Republicans and Democrats would appoint an even number of members to the panel — most likely three GOP and three Democratic appointees. Current lawmakers and lobbyists could not sit on the panel.
+
=== Peru-United States Free Trade Agreement deal ===
* The panel would receive complaints from outside groups and then invite witnesses to provide relevant testimony.
+
* The panel would not have subpoena power or the power to put witnesses under oath.
+
* Upon receiving a complaint, the panel would have 45 days to compile a report recommending dismissal or further action and pass it to the House Standards of Official Conduct Committee. If the panel could not complete its report within 45 days, it could grant itself a short extension.
+
* The ethics committee would have up to 90 days to create an investigative subcommittee to probe the complaint or vote to dismiss it. If the committee voted to dismiss the complaint, the independent panel’s report would be made publicly available.
+
  
Several congressional watchdog groups came out against the measure, citing a provision that requires organizations that submit complaints to the independent ethics committee to disclose their donors, putting the legislation in danger of failing. Organizations like Public Citizen, Common Cause, Democracy 21, and the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, who had made the creation of such an outside ethics board a major priority since the Jack Abramoff scandal, felt that having to disclose their donors was not a necessary part of reform and could put them in jeopardy. Members of the House pushing for the outside ethics office argued that watchdog groups can't call for openness in Congress, while denying transparency on their part. The reform organizations also argued that the ethics panel as it was being considered in the House was not strong enough to produce real ethics reform, making calls to strengthen the potential committee's investigative authority and provide it with subpoena power.
+
On May 10, 2007, Democratic congressional leaders, including House Speaker [[Nancy Pelosi]] (D-Calif.) and [[House Committee on Ways and Means]] Chair [[Charles Rangel]] (D-N.Y.), struck a deal with President Bush that secured their support for the Peru-U.S. agreement in exchange for inserting provisions that protect workers' rights to organize and bargain collectively. The Peruvian government would also have to agree to the changes before Congress could consider the agreement.<ref>Doug Palmer, [http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWBT00695620070511?feedType=RSS "Democrats, Bush strike deal on trade,"] ''Reuters'', May 11, 2007.</ref>
  
{{main|Prospects for Ethics Reform in the 110th Congress}}
+
{{main|Peru-United States Free Trade Agreement}}<br>
  
===Election reform===
+
=== Ethics reform ===
On June 25, 2007, the House passed by voice vote the '''Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2007'', sponsored by Rep. [[Rahm Emanuel]] (D-Ill.). The bill, still pending passage in the Senate, would establish criminal penalties for acts of voter deception. Those who knowingly disseminate false information with the intention of keeping others from voting would face up to five years in prison under the legislation. Pelosi, who supported the measure, stated that the bill focused on "voter suppression tactics using misinformation and deception targeted at minority voters," and that "disenfranchising voters through deception about time, place, or eligibility for voting must be illegal."
+
{{Main|Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2007}}
+
  
===DC voting rights===
+
After emerging victorious in the November 7, 2006 elections Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi pledged "to lead the most honest, the most open and the most ethical Congress in history." Pelosi also pledged to sever the ties between K Street, the Washington corridor of lobbying firms, and Congress. As incoming Speaker, Pelosi also stated that she would push to make the sponsors of congressional earmarks public prior to votes. She stated, "There has to be transparency ... I'd just as soon do away with all (earmarks), but that probably isn't realistic."
After the Democrats took control of Congress in the 2006 elections, Pelosi expressed interest in pursuing congressional voting rights for the District of Columbia through the '''District of Columbia Fair and Equal Voting Rights Act of 2007'''. Previously, in 2006, Pelsoi endorsed an earlier version of the bill by Rep. [[Tom Davis]] (R-Va.) after it was clear that it would not call for the Utah state legislature to redraw its congressional districts as part of a compromise giving the state an additional House seat as well. Immediately following the 2006 elections, as speaker-elect, Pelosi said that she would seek to change House rules on the first day of the 110th Congress to temporarily allow the District's delegate (in this case [[Eleanor Holmes Norton]]) to vote on proposed changes, but not final approval of legislation on the floor. She also reaffirmed her support for the bill put forth by Davis and Norton in the 109th Congress.
+
{{Main|District of Columbia Fair and Equal Voting Rights Act of 2007}}
+
  
===Impeachment of President George W. Bush===
+
==== Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2006 ====
In statements she made to the Washington Post in early 2006, then-House Minority Leader Pelosi left open the possibility that if Democrats took over the House after the November 2006 elections, their planned investigations into the Bush administration could lead to impeachment. Although impeachment would not be the goal of the investigations, she said, "You never know where it leads to."
+
  
In May 2006, the Washington Post reported that Pelosi was not interested in pursuing impeachment and had taken it "off the table." She reiterated this position throughout the 2006 campaign, noting on 60 Minutes that Republicans would "just love" the "waste of time" the proceedings would be. She added that "Making them lame ducks...is good enough for me."
+
Minority Leader Pelosi introduced '''The Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2006''' on January 20, 2006, in the wake of numerous guilty pleas by and indictments of lobbyists and members of Congress. Specifically, the bill would:
  
After the Democrats won control of the House in November 2006, Speaker-elect Pelosi reinforced that any effort to impeach President Bush was "off the table."
+
*Ban lobbyists from giving gifts or travel to members or their staff.
{{Main|Efforts to initiate the impeachment of President George W. Bush}}
+
*Require lobbyists to file electronic, quarterly reports. The report must contain information pertaining to efforts to stimulate grassroots support, previous work in the executive or legislative branches, and provide certification of the report with the possibility of criminal penalties for failing to submit a certified report. The bill also creates a searchable public database of lobbying reports.
 +
*Double the "cooling-off" period where lawmakers, staff, and Executive branch employees cannot lobby there former offices of employment from one-year to two-years.
 +
*Stop efforts like the "K Street Project" by banning efforts of members of Congress and staff to enforce partisan discipline in private organizations. The penalty would be a fine or up to 15 years in prison with a possible ban on serving public office.
 +
*Require lawmakers, staff, and Executive employees to disclose outside job negotiations and to receive approval from the Office of Government Ethics.  
 +
*Require conference committees to be open to the public and require conference reports to be publicly available on the Internet at least 24 hours prior to a vote.
 +
*Require that any appointee to a public safety position have proven credentials and training in one or more areas that are relevant.
 +
*Provide oversight of government contracting. Require contractors to work for contracts in an open, competitive bidding process. Create stiffer penalties for wartime fraud and prohibit contractors with conflicts of interest from participating in competitive bidding.
  
==Biography==
+
The bill was referred to six committees, Judiciary, Rules, Government Reform, Standards and Conduct, Armed Services, and Administration, and failed to emerge from any one of the six.  
Pelosi was born March 26, 1940 in Baltimore, Maryland. Her father, [[w:Thomas D'Alesandro, Jr.|Thomas D'Alesandro, Jr.]], was a U.S. Congressman from Maryland and also a Mayor of Baltimore, the latter office having been held also by her brother [[w:Thomas L. J. D'Alesandro III|Thomas L. J. D'Alesandro III]] in the late 1960s.
+
  
Pelosi attended Trinity College (now Trinity University) in Washington, DC. She married and moved to San Francisco where she became involved in Democratic politics, working her way up to becoming party chairwoman for Northern California. In 1984 she served as the head of the host committee for the Democratic National Convention that year. In 1986, the year before she was elected to Congress, Pelosi served as Finance Chair to the successful [[Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee]], which helped the Democrats win back the Senate.
+
==== Independent ethics commission ====
  
The Pelosi family has a net worth of over $25 million, mainly investments of husband Paul Pelosi. Besides a San Francisco Bay area large portfolio of jointly owned real estate, he also has millions of dollars worth of shares in publicly traded companies such as Microsoft, Amazon.com and AT&T.<ref>Zachary Coile. [http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/06/26/BAG7B7CDMQ1.DTL "Bay lawmakers among wealthiest,"] ''San Fransisco Chronicle.'' June 26, 2004.</ref> The Pelosi family of San Francisco is politically well-connected. Her brother-in-law, Ron Pelosi, was a long-time member of the city's Board of Supervisors and a well-known personality on KQED, the city's educational television station. She has five children and six grandchildren.
+
On February 1, 2007, Speaker Pelosi and House Minority Leader [[John Boehner]] (R-Ohio) announced the creation of a "task force" to study implementation of an outside ethics body to oversee Congress. The task force, chaired by Rep. [[Michael Capuano]] (D-Mass.), issued it's report to the House in May 2007.  
  
Pelosi won in a special election to succeed [[w:Sala Burton|Sala Burton]] and took office on June 2, 1987. She was elected to a full term in 1988 and has easily held the seat since. She has never faced a credible Republican opponent, which is not surprising since Republicans only make up 13 percent of registered voters in the district.
+
On June 1, 2007, Pelosi announced her intention to create an independent ethics commission that would allow outside groups to file complaints against members of Congress, which previously could only be filed by other members. The commission, as proposed by a special task force chaired by Rep. [[Michael Capuano]] (D-Mass.), could filter complaints but have no judging authority.<ref>Mike Soraghan, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-committed-to-allowing-outside-groups-file-ethics-complaints-2007-06-01.html "Pelosi committed to allowing outside groups file ethics complaints,"] ''The Hill'', June 1, 2007.</ref> Implementation of the new commission was delayed, however, as many members were worried by the ability of non-members to submit complaints, fearing the change would be abused with politically motivated attacks. Fifty-three House members signed onto an alternative piece of ethics legislation, introduced by Rep. [[Baron Hill]] (D-Ind.), which would create a powerful investigative panel consisting of 12 former representatives, but would only allow complaints from sitting members. According to advocates familiar with the proposal in the House, the ethics panel would include the following components:
  
After the [[w:Tiananmen protests of 1989|Tiananmen protests of 1989]], Pelosi became a supporter of the [[w:Chinese democracy movement|Chinese democracy movement]] and vocal critic of the government of the [[w:People's Republic of China|People's Republic of China]] and sponsored the [[w:Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992|Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992]].
+
*Republicans and Democrats would appoint an even number of members to the panel — most likely three GOP and three Democratic appointees. Current lawmakers and lobbyists could not sit on the panel.
 +
*The panel would receive complaints from outside groups and then invite witnesses to provide relevant testimony.
 +
*The panel would not have subpoena power or the power to put witnesses under oath.
 +
*Upon receiving a complaint, the panel would have 45 days to compile a report recommending dismissal or further action and pass it to the House Standards of Official Conduct Committee. If the panel could not complete its report within 45 days, it could grant itself a short extension.
 +
*The ethics committee would have up to 90 days to create an investigative subcommittee to probe the complaint or vote to dismiss it. If the committee voted to dismiss the complaint, the independent panel’s report would be made publicly available.
  
In 2001, she defeated [[Steny Hoyer]] to become the [[House Minority Whip]], serving as second-in-command to Minority Leader [[Dick Gephardt]] of Missouri.
+
Several congressional watchdog groups came out against the measure, citing a provision that requires organizations that submit complaints to the independent ethics committee to disclose their donors, putting the legislation in danger of failing. Organizations like Public Citizen, Common Cause, Democracy 21, and the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, who had made the creation of such an outside ethics board a major priority since the Jack Abramoff scandal, felt that having to disclose their donors was not a necessary part of reform and could put them in jeopardy. Members of the House pushing for the outside ethics office argued that watchdog groups can't call for openness in Congress, while denying transparency on their part. The reform organizations also argued that the ethics panel as it was being considered in the House was not strong enough to produce real ethics reform, making calls to strengthen the potential committee's investigative authority and provide it with subpoena power.  
  
After the electoral defeat of 2002, Gephardt decided to run for President in 2004 and bowed out of his Minority Leader position. The leadership election pitted Pelosi against [[Marcy Kaptur]] of Ohio and Tennessee centrist [[Harold Ford, Jr.]]  She stated in 2002, "We must draw clear distinctions between our vision of the future and the extreme policies put forward by the Republicans. We cannot allow Republicans to pretend they share our values and then legislate against those values without consequence."<ref>Harold Meyerson. [http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=7699 "How Nancy Pelosi Took Control,"] ''The American Prospect.'' May 12, 2004.</ref>
+
{{main|Prospects for Ethics Reform in the 110th Congress}}
  
During the run-up to the 2002 mid-term elections Pelosi showcased what her leadership would look like by opposing Gephardt's decision to back President Bush's Iraq war resolution.<ref>Harold Meyerson. [http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=7699 "How Nancy Pelosi Took Control,"] ''The American Prospect.'' May 12, 2004.</ref>
+
=== Election reform ===
  
After Kaptur dropped out of the race, Pelosi bested Ford in a 177-29 vote. By way of her victory Pelosi made history by becoming the first woman to lead a party in Congress.<ref>Sean Loughlin. [http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/11/14/democrats.leadership/ "Democrats pick Pelosi as House leader,"] ''CNN.'' November 15, 2002.</ref>
+
On June 25, 2007, the House passed by voice vote the '''Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2007'', sponsored by Rep. [[Rahm Emanuel]] (D-Ill.). The bill, still pending passage in the Senate, would establish criminal penalties for acts of voter deception. Those who knowingly disseminate false information with the intention of keeping others from voting would face up to five years in prison under the legislation. Pelosi, who supported the measure, stated that the bill focused on "voter suppression tactics using misinformation and deception targeted at minority voters," and that "disenfranchising voters through deception about time, place, or eligibility for voting must be illegal." {{Main|Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2007}}
  
Pelosi has led the Democratic caucus on any number of issues. Despite losing many critical votes, she and her leadership team have been able to bring a unity to the Democratic caucus that hasn't existed for decades.<ref>Marc Sandalow, Erin McCormick. [http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/04/02/MNGSHI24ON1.DTL "Pelosi's goal: Democrats back on top,"] ''San Fransisco Chronicle.'' April 2, 2006.</ref>
+
=== DC voting rights ===
''Congressional Quarterly'' examined over 600 roll call votes from 2005 where "a majority of Republicans voted against a majority of Democrats" and found that Democrats voted unanimously 82 times and on the party line 88 percent of the time. These are the highest numbers since ''CQ'' began keeping a tally of roll call votes in 1956.<ref>Marc Sandalow, Erin McCormick. [http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/04/02/MNGSHI24ON1.DTL "Pelosi's goal: Democrats back on top,"] ''San Fransisco Chronicle.'' April 2, 2006.</ref> She also worked hard to defeat the [[2003 Medicare prescription drug bill]], which passed the House after 16 Democrats joined the Republicans in voting "yes". She calls the Medicare vote her biggest disappointment.<ref>Harold Meyerson. [http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=7699 "How Nancy Pelosi Took Control,"] ''The American Prospect.'' May 12, 2004.</ref>
+
  
Pelosi has often allowed members of the Democratic caucus to showcase positions or pieces of legislation rather than keeping the media coverage for herself. Rep. [[John Spratt]] (D-S.C.) introduced a resolution challenging [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] to come back to House and seek an authorization to use military force before invading Iraq, for example. Another example is that of [[John Murtha]]'s call for a withdrawal from Iraq. Pelosi coordinated Murtha's call for withdrawal from behind the scenes while trying to appease the part of the party that opposed Murtha's plan.<ref>Amy Sullivan. [http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0605.sullivan1.html "Not as Lame as You Think,"] ''Washington Monthly.'' May 2006.</ref>
+
After the Democrats took control of Congress in the 2006 elections, Pelosi expressed interest in pursuing congressional voting rights for the District of Columbia through the '''District of Columbia Fair and Equal Voting Rights Act of 2007'''. Previously, in 2006, Pelsoi endorsed an earlier version of the bill by Rep. [[Tom Davis]] (R-Va.) after it was clear that it would not call for the Utah state legislature to redraw its congressional districts as part of a compromise giving the state an additional House seat as well. Immediately following the 2006 elections, as speaker-elect, Pelosi said that she would seek to change House rules on the first day of the 110th Congress to temporarily allow the District's delegate (in this case [[Eleanor Holmes Norton]]) to vote on proposed changes, but not final approval of legislation on the floor. She also reaffirmed her support for the bill put forth by Davis and Norton in the 109th Congress. {{Main|District of Columbia Fair and Equal Voting Rights Act of 2007}}
  
====Speaker of the House====
+
=== Impeachment of President George W. Bush ===
Following the Democratic victory in the 2006 midterm elections in which the party regained a majority in the House fro the first time since 1994, Pelosi became the consensus candidate to become Speaker of the House when the [[110th Congress]] convened in January 2006.  She was unanimously selected for the position by her peers on November 16, 2006, thus becoming the first woman ever elected Speaker of the House.<ref>Jonathan Weisman and Lois Romano. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/16/AR2006111600514.html "Democrats Pick Hoyer Over Murtha,"] ''Washington Post.'' November 17, 2007.</ref>
+
  
====2006 elections====
+
In statements she made to the Washington Post in early 2006, then-House Minority Leader Pelosi left open the possibility that if Democrats took over the House after the November 2006 elections, their planned investigations into the Bush administration could lead to impeachment. Although impeachment would not be the goal of the investigations, she said, "You never know where it leads to."
In 2006, the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] nominated [[Michael A. Denunzio]], and the [[Green Party]] nominated [[Krissy Keefer]] to face Pelosi in her November 2006 bid for reelection. (See [[U.S. congressional elections in 2006]]) Pelosi overwhelmingly won reelection, receiving 80% of the vote.<ref>[http://opensecrets.org/states/election.asp?state=CA 2006 Congressional Races in California] ''Center for Responsive Politics.''</ref><ref>[http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/CA/ 2006 Races in California] ''CNN.''</ref>
+
  
====2008 elections====
+
In May 2006, the Washington Post reported that Pelosi was not interested in pursuing impeachment and had taken it "off the table." She reiterated this position throughout the 2006 campaign, noting on 60 Minutes that Republicans would "just love" the "waste of time" the proceedings would be. She added that "Making them lame ducks...is good enough for me."  
{{Wobble list intro|state=California}}
+
{{Superdelegate Populist}} "And, the speaker said again in an interview Friday that was aired today, the decisions of the party's "super-delegates" to the Democratic National Convention should "reflect" which candidate has claimed the most pledged delegates in a contest which she believes will end well before the convention in Denver."<ref name="Swamp">Mark Silva, [http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2008/03/pelosi_party_should_heed_the_w.html "Pelosi: Party should heed the will of the voters"], ''The Swamp,'' presented by ''The Baltimore Sun'', March 16, 2008</ref>
+
  
 +
After the Democrats won control of the House in November 2006, Speaker-elect Pelosi reinforced that any effort to impeach President Bush was "off the table." {{Main|Efforts to initiate the impeachment of President George W. Bush}}
  
{| {{Congresspedia money data block}}
+
== Biography ==
|
+
 
 +
Pelosi was born March 26, 1940 in Baltimore, Maryland. Her father, [[W:Thomas D'Alesandro, Jr.|Thomas D'Alesandro, Jr.]], was a U.S. Congressman from Maryland and also a Mayor of Baltimore, the latter office having been held also by her brother [[W:Thomas L. J. D'Alesandro III|Thomas L. J. D'Alesandro III]] in the late 1960s.
 +
 
 +
Pelosi attended Trinity College (now Trinity University) in Washington, DC. She married and moved to San Francisco where she became involved in Democratic politics, working her way up to becoming party chairwoman for Northern California. In 1984 she served as the head of the host committee for the Democratic National Convention that year. In 1986, the year before she was elected to Congress, Pelosi served as Finance Chair to the successful [[Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee]], which helped the Democrats win back the Senate.
 +
 
 +
The Pelosi family has a net worth of over $25 million, mainly investments of husband Paul Pelosi. Besides a San Francisco Bay area large portfolio of jointly owned real estate, he also has millions of dollars worth of shares in publicly traded companies such as Microsoft, Amazon.com and AT&amp;T.<ref>Zachary Coile. [http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/06/26/BAG7B7CDMQ1.DTL "Bay lawmakers among wealthiest,"] ''San Fransisco Chronicle.'' June 26, 2004.</ref> The Pelosi family of San Francisco is politically well-connected. Her brother-in-law, Ron Pelosi, was a long-time member of the city's Board of Supervisors and a well-known personality on KQED, the city's educational television station. She has five children and six grandchildren.
 +
 
 +
Pelosi won in a special election to succeed [[W:Sala Burton|Sala Burton]] and took office on June 2, 1987. She was elected to a full term in 1988 and has easily held the seat since. She has never faced a credible Republican opponent, which is not surprising since Republicans only make up 13 percent of registered voters in the district.
 +
 
 +
After the [[W:Tiananmen protests of 1989|Tiananmen protests of 1989]], Pelosi became a supporter of the [[W:Chinese democracy movement|Chinese democracy movement]] and vocal critic of the government of the [[W:People's Republic of China|People's Republic of China]] and sponsored the [[W:Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992|Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992]].
 +
 
 +
In 2001, she defeated [[Steny Hoyer]] to become the [[House Minority Whip]], serving as second-in-command to Minority Leader [[Dick Gephardt]] of Missouri.
 +
 
 +
After the electoral defeat of 2002, Gephardt decided to run for President in 2004 and bowed out of his Minority Leader position. The leadership election pitted Pelosi against [[Marcy Kaptur]] of Ohio and Tennessee centrist [[Harold Ford, Jr.]] She stated in 2002, "We must draw clear distinctions between our vision of the future and the extreme policies put forward by the Republicans. We cannot allow Republicans to pretend they share our values and then legislate against those values without consequence."<ref>Harold Meyerson. [http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&amp;name=ViewPrint&amp;articleId=7699 "How Nancy Pelosi Took Control,"] ''The American Prospect.'' May 12, 2004.</ref>
 +
 
 +
During the run-up to the 2002 mid-term elections Pelosi showcased what her leadership would look like by opposing Gephardt's decision to back President Bush's Iraq war resolution.<ref>Harold Meyerson. [http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&amp;name=ViewPrint&amp;articleId=7699 "How Nancy Pelosi Took Control,"] ''The American Prospect.'' May 12, 2004.</ref>
 +
 
 +
After Kaptur dropped out of the race, Pelosi bested Ford in a 177-29 vote. By way of her victory Pelosi made history by becoming the first woman to lead a party in Congress.<ref>Sean Loughlin. [http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/11/14/democrats.leadership/ "Democrats pick Pelosi as House leader,"] ''CNN.'' November 15, 2002.</ref>
 +
 
 +
Pelosi has led the Democratic caucus on any number of issues. Despite losing many critical votes, she and her leadership team have been able to bring a unity to the Democratic caucus that hasn't existed for decades.<ref>Marc Sandalow, Erin McCormick. [http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/04/02/MNGSHI24ON1.DTL "Pelosi's goal: Democrats back on top,"] ''San Fransisco Chronicle.'' April 2, 2006.</ref> ''Congressional Quarterly'' examined over 600 roll call votes from 2005 where "a majority of Republicans voted against a majority of Democrats" and found that Democrats voted unanimously 82 times and on the party line 88 percent of the time. These are the highest numbers since ''CQ'' began keeping a tally of roll call votes in 1956.<ref>Marc Sandalow, Erin McCormick. [http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/04/02/MNGSHI24ON1.DTL "Pelosi's goal: Democrats back on top,"] ''San Fransisco Chronicle.'' April 2, 2006.</ref> She also worked hard to defeat the [[2003 Medicare prescription drug bill]], which passed the House after 16 Democrats joined the Republicans in voting "yes". She calls the Medicare vote her biggest disappointment.<ref>Harold Meyerson. [http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&amp;name=ViewPrint&amp;articleId=7699 "How Nancy Pelosi Took Control,"] ''The American Prospect.'' May 12, 2004.</ref>
 +
 
 +
Pelosi has often allowed members of the Democratic caucus to showcase positions or pieces of legislation rather than keeping the media coverage for herself. Rep. [[John Spratt]] (D-S.C.) introduced a resolution challenging [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] to come back to House and seek an authorization to use military force before invading Iraq, for example. Another example is that of [[John Murtha]]'s call for a withdrawal from Iraq. Pelosi coordinated Murtha's call for withdrawal from behind the scenes while trying to appease the part of the party that opposed Murtha's plan.<ref>Amy Sullivan. [http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0605.sullivan1.html "Not as Lame as You Think,"] ''Washington Monthly.'' May 2006.</ref>
 +
 
 +
==== Speaker of the House ====
 +
 
 +
Following the Democratic victory in the 2006 midterm elections in which the party regained a majority in the House fro the first time since 1994, Pelosi became the consensus candidate to become Speaker of the House when the [[110th Congress]] convened in January 2006. She was unanimously selected for the position by her peers on November 16, 2006, thus becoming the first woman ever elected Speaker of the House.<ref>Jonathan Weisman and Lois Romano. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/16/AR2006111600514.html "Democrats Pick Hoyer Over Murtha,"] ''Washington Post.'' November 17, 2007.</ref>
 +
 
 +
==== 2006 elections ====
 +
 
 +
In 2006, the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] nominated [[Michael A. Denunzio]], and the [[Green Party]] nominated [[Krissy Keefer]] to face Pelosi in her November 2006 bid for reelection. (See [[U.S. congressional elections in 2006]]) Pelosi overwhelmingly won reelection, receiving 80% of the vote.<ref>[http://opensecrets.org/states/election.asp?state=CA 2006 Congressional Races in California] ''Center for Responsive Politics.''</ref><ref>[http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/CA/ 2006 Races in California] ''CNN.''</ref>
 +
 
 +
==== 2008 elections ====
 +
 
 +
{{Wobble list intro|state=California}} {{Superdelegate Populist}} "And, the speaker said again in an interview Friday that was aired today, the decisions of the party's "super-delegates" to the Democratic National Convention should "reflect" which candidate has claimed the most pledged delegates in a contest which she believes will end well before the convention in Denver."<ref name="Swamp">Mark Silva, [http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2008/03/pelosi_party_should_heed_the_w.html "Pelosi: Party should heed the will of the voters"], ''The Swamp,'' presented by ''The Baltimore Sun'', March 16, 2008</ref>
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
{|
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
== Money in Politics ==
 +
 
 +
{{Congresspedia money in politics header}}  
 +
 
 +
=== Campaign contributions ===
 +
 
 +
{{Congresspedia campaign contributions explanation}} [[Image:Pelosi elections.jpg|frame|right|Source: Federal Election Commission]]&lt;crpcontribdata&gt;cid=N00007360&amp;cycle=2006&lt;/crpcontribdata&gt; {{congresspedia money|cid=N00007360}}
 +
 
 +
=== Revolving door ===
 +
 
 +
{{Congresspedia revolving door explanation}} {{Congresspedia revolving door info|crpname=Pelosi%2C+Nancy}}
 +
 
 +
=== Privately funded travel ===
 +
 
 +
{{Congresspedia private travel explanation}} {{Congresspedia private travel info|cid=N00007360}}
 +
 
 +
=== Personal finances ===
 +
 
 +
{{Congresspedia PFD explanation}} {{Congresspedia PFD info|cid=N00007360}}
  
==Money in Politics==
 
{{Congresspedia money in politics header}}
 
===Campaign contributions===
 
{{Congresspedia campaign contributions explanation}}
 
[[Image:pelosi_elections.jpg|frame|right|Source: Federal Election Commission]]<crpcontribdata>cid=N00007360&cycle=2006</crpcontribdata>
 
{{congresspedia money|cid=N00007360}}
 
===Revolving door===
 
{{Congresspedia revolving door explanation}}
 
{{Congresspedia revolving door info|crpname=Pelosi%2C+Nancy}}
 
===Privately funded travel===
 
{{Congresspedia private travel explanation}}
 
{{Congresspedia private travel info|cid=N00007360}}
 
===Personal finances===
 
{{Congresspedia PFD explanation}}
 
{{Congresspedia PFD info|cid=N00007360}}
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
==Committees and Affiliations ==
+
== Committees and Affiliations ==
===Committees===
+
As the House Speaker, Pelosi does not belong to any committees.
+
  
===Committee assignments in the 109th Congress (2005-2006)===
+
=== Committees ===
  
===Coalitions and Caucuses===
+
As the House Speaker, Pelosi does not belong to any committees.
* Co Chair, Democratic National Platform Committee, 1992
+
* Chair, Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, 1985
+
* Co Chair, AIDS Task Force of the House Democratic Caucus
+
* Co Chair, Biomedical Research Caucus
+
* Chair, Congressional Working Group on China
+
* Vice Chair, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee
+
* Democratic Homeland Security Task Force
+
* Democratic National Committee
+
* Chair, Democratic Steering Committee
+
* Vice Chair, Executive Committee, Democratic Study Group
+
  
===Boards and other Affiliations===
+
=== Committee assignments in the 109th Congress (2005-2006) ===
* Founder, Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS
+
 
* Board of Trustees, [[LSB Leakey Foundation]]
+
=== Coalitions and Caucuses ===
 +
 
 +
*Co Chair, Democratic National Platform Committee, 1992
 +
*Chair, Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, 1985
 +
*Co Chair, AIDS Task Force of the House Democratic Caucus
 +
*Co Chair, Biomedical Research Caucus
 +
*Chair, Congressional Working Group on China
 +
*Vice Chair, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee
 +
*Democratic Homeland Security Task Force
 +
*Democratic National Committee
 +
*Chair, Democratic Steering Committee
 +
*Vice Chair, Executive Committee, Democratic Study Group
 +
 
 +
=== Boards and other Affiliations ===
 +
 
 +
*Founder, Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS  
 +
*Board of Trustees, [[LSB Leakey Foundation]]  
 
*Public Advisory Committee, [[Population Institute]]
 
*Public Advisory Committee, [[Population Institute]]
  
==More Background Data==
+
== More Background Data ==
 +
 
 
{{congresspedia footer |
 
{{congresspedia footer |
 
   cid=N00007360|
 
   cid=N00007360|
Line 299: Line 324:
 
   wpid=p000197 |
 
   wpid=p000197 |
 
   district=CA08
 
   district=CA08
}}
+
}} {{wikipedia}}  
{{wikipedia}}
+
  
==Contact==
+
== Contact ==
'''DC Office:'''<br>
+
2371 Rayburn House Office Building<br>
+
Washington, DC  20515-0508<bR>
+
Phone: 202-225-4965<Br>
+
Fax: 202-225-8259<bR>
+
Email: sf.nancy AT mail.house.gov<br>
+
[http://www.house.gov/pelosi/cotact/contact.html Web Email]<br>
+
[http://www.house.gov/pelosi/ Website]<br>
+
  
'''District Office - San Francisco:'''<br>
+
'''DC Office:'''<br> 2371 Rayburn House Office Building<br> Washington, DC 20515-0508<br> Phone: 202-225-4965<br> Fax: 202-225-8259<br> Email: sf.nancy AT mail.house.gov<br> [http://www.house.gov/pelosi/cotact/contact.html Web Email]<br> [http://www.house.gov/pelosi/ Website]<br>  
450 Golden Gate Avenue, 14th Floor<br>
+
San Francisco, CA  94102-3460<bR>
+
Phone: 415-556-4862<bR>
+
Fax: 415-861-1670<br>
+
  
===Twitter===
+
'''District Office - San Francisco:'''<br> 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 14th Floor<br> San Francisco, CA 94102-3460<br> Phone: 415-556-4862<br> Fax: 415-861-1670<br>
 +
 
 +
=== Twitter ===
 
<div id="twitter" style="padding:0.5em 1em 1em 1em; border-collapse: collapse; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 
<div id="twitter" style="padding:0.5em 1em 1em 1em; border-collapse: collapse; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
'''Nancy Pelosi posts on Twitter at http://twitter.com/nancypelosi/'''
+
'''Nancy Pelosi posts on Twitter at http://twitter.com/nancypelosi/'''  
  
'''Latest posts:'''
+
'''Latest posts:''' <small>&lt;rss&gt;http://twitter.com/statuses/user_timeline/14823587.rss|title=none| max=3| short&lt;/rss&gt; </small> See all the [[Members of Congress who Twitter]]  
<small>
+
</div>  
<rss>http://twitter.com/statuses/user_timeline/14823587.rss|title=none| max=3| short</rss>
+
== Articles and resources ==
</small>
+
 
See all the [[members of Congress who Twitter]]
+
=== Related SourceWatch articles ===
</div>
+
  
==Articles and resources==
 
===Related SourceWatch articles===
 
 
*[[The case for impeachment of President George W. Bush]]
 
*[[The case for impeachment of President George W. Bush]]
  
===Sources===
+
=== Sources ===
<references/>
+
  
===External resources===
+
<references />
  
*[http://www.comedycentral.com/sitewide/media_player/play.jhtml?itemId=35710 Interview with Jon Stewart], ''The Daily Show with Jon Stewart'', November 30, 2005. ([[Daily Show|Other Daily Show interviews with members of Congress.]])
+
=== External resources ===
*[http://schema-root.org/region/americas/north_america/usa/government/politicians/nancy_pelosi/ Schema-root.org: Nancy Pelosi]&mdash;current news feed for Nancy Pelosi.
+
 
*[http://www.technorati.com/search/%22Nancy+Pelosi%22?authority=n Technorati Search: Nancy Pelosi].
+
*[http://www.comedycentral.com/sitewide/media_player/play.jhtml?itemId=35710 Interview with Jon Stewart], ''The Daily Show with Jon Stewart'', November 30, 2005. ([[Daily Show|Other Daily Show interviews with members of Congress.]])  
*[http://news.google.com/news?svnum=10&hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=7&as_minm=2&as_maxd=9&as_maxm=3&q=%22Nancy+Pelosi%22 Google News Search: Nancy Pelosi].
+
*[http://schema-root.org/region/americas/north_america/usa/government/politicians/nancy_pelosi/ Schema-root.org: Nancy Pelosi]—current news feed for Nancy Pelosi.  
*[http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/search?p=%22Nancy+Pelosi%22&c= Yahoo! News Search: Nancy Pelosi].
+
*[http://www.technorati.com/search/%22Nancy+Pelosi%22?authority=n Technorati Search: Nancy Pelosi].  
*[http://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/features/congtravel/member_report.php?member=7258 Power Trips: How much does Nancy Pelosi travel?]
+
*[http://news.google.com/news?svnum=10&hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=7&as_minm=2&as_maxd=9&as_maxm=3&q=%22Nancy+Pelosi%22 Google News Search: Nancy Pelosi].  
*[http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?tab=stats&id=400314 GovTrack Statistics: Nancy Pelosi].
+
*[http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/search?p=%22Nancy+Pelosi%22&c= Yahoo! News Search: Nancy Pelosi].  
*[http://opensecrets.org/races/index.asp Open Secrets] - 2006 congressional races database
+
*[http://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/features/congtravel/member_report.php?member=7258 Power Trips: How much does Nancy Pelosi travel?]  
*[http://www.whereistand.com/NancyPelosi Compare where Nancy Pelosi stands on the issues] at whereIstand.com
+
*[http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?tab=stats&id=400314 GovTrack Statistics: Nancy Pelosi].  
 +
*[http://opensecrets.org/races/index.asp Open Secrets] - 2006 congressional races database  
 +
*[http://www.whereistand.com/NancyPelosi Compare where Nancy Pelosi stands on the issues] at whereIstand.com  
 
*[http://www.womensvoicesforchange.org/2008/02/nancy-pelosi.html]
 
*[http://www.womensvoicesforchange.org/2008/02/nancy-pelosi.html]
  
===Pelosi's Websites===
+
=== Pelosi's Websites ===
*[http://www.house.gov/pelosi Official website].
+
 
*[http://www.democraticleader.house.gov Democratic Leader website].
+
*[http://www.house.gov/pelosi Official website].  
 +
*[http://www.democraticleader.house.gov Democratic Leader website].  
 
*[http://speaker.gov/blog/ ''The Gavel''], Speaker's Blog (launched February 6, 2007).
 
*[http://speaker.gov/blog/ ''The Gavel''], Speaker's Blog (launched February 6, 2007).
  
===External articles===
+
=== External articles ===
*[http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/28/pelosi-talk-radio/ "Pelosi: ‘Hate Radio’ Hijacked Political Discourse With ‘Xenophobic, Anti-Immigrant’ Rhetoric,"] ''Think Progress'', June 28, 2007. re [[hate radio]]
+
 
 +
*[http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/28/pelosi-talk-radio/ "Pelosi: ‘Hate Radio’ Hijacked Political Discourse With ‘Xenophobic, Anti-Immigrant’ Rhetoric,"] ''Think Progress'', June 28, 2007. re [[Hate radio]]  
 
*[http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/16/pelosi-hate-radio-made-a-vicious-attack-on-frost/ "Pelosi: ‘Hate radio’ made a ‘vicious attack’ on Frost,"] ''Think Progress'', October 16, 2007.
 
*[http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/16/pelosi-hate-radio-made-a-vicious-attack-on-frost/ "Pelosi: ‘Hate radio’ made a ‘vicious attack’ on Frost,"] ''Think Progress'', October 16, 2007.
  
===Local blogs and discussion sites===
+
=== Local blogs and discussion sites ===
*''[http://www.calitics.com Calitics]''
+
 
*''[http://www.gregdewar.com/ Politicks isn't Pretty'']
+
*''[http://www.calitics.com Calitics]''  
 +
*[http://www.gregdewar.com/ ''Politicks isn't Pretty'']  
 
*''[http://ari.typepad.com/ Tiger Beat: Music, Culture, and Politics]''
 
*''[http://ari.typepad.com/ Tiger Beat: Music, Culture, and Politics]''
  
{{Congresspedia state|California|8|Pelosi, Nancy}}[[Category:Congresspedia|Pelosi, Nancy]]
+
{{Congresspedia state|California|8|Pelosi, Nancy}}  
[[Category:Members of U.S. House of Representatives|Pelosi, Nancy]]
+
[[Category:Democratic Party (USA)]]
+
  
 
{{Politician  
 
{{Politician  
  
 
<!-- From Wikipedia: -->  
 
<!-- From Wikipedia: -->  
 +
  
 
|term_start =June 2, 1987  
 
|term_start =June 2, 1987  
Line 376: Line 390:
  
 
<!-- From Cause Caller -->  
 
<!-- From Cause Caller -->  
 +
  
 
|Birth=March 26, 1940
 
|Birth=March 26, 1940
Line 387: Line 402:
  
 
<!-- NEW -->
 
<!-- NEW -->
 +
  
 
|Current Office=U.S. House of Representatives
 
|Current Office=U.S. House of Representatives
Line 398: Line 414:
  
 
<!-- From Congresspedia -->
 
<!-- From Congresspedia -->
 +
  
 
|110th Caucuses =
 
|110th Caucuses =
Line 446: Line 463:
 
|Campaign Office 5 Fax=  
 
|Campaign Office 5 Fax=  
  
}}
+
}}  
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Congresspedia|Pelosi, Nancy]] [[Category:Members_of_U.S._House_of_Representatives|Pelosi, Nancy]] [[Category:Democratic_Party_(USA)]]

Revision as of 16:14, January 27, 2009


U.S. Senator

Nancy Pelosi

400314.jpeg

D-CA

CA1-small.gif

Positions
Leadership: Speaker of the House
Committees:
(subcommittees and past assignments)

Candidates for the CA-Senate Class I Seat:
(Next election: 2 November 2010)

Confirmed: None so far
Considering: None so far
Rumored: None so far
Potential: None so far
Dropped-out: None so far
(more info and editing for the CA-Senate Class I Seat)
On the Web
Official website
File:Nancypelosi.jpg
Nancy Pelosi currently serves the 8th Congressional district of California

Nancy Patricia D'Alesandro Pelosi is the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives for the 110th Congress. A Democrat, she is the first woman to hold the post of Speaker, or even lead a major political party in either house of Congress. She has represented the 8th District of California in the United States House of Representatives since 1987. (map)

Contents

Record and controversies

Congressional scorecards

Click through the score to see the records of other members of Congress and full descriptions of the individual votes.

Want to see someone else's scorecard added to the list? You can do it!

Organization 2007 Scorecard
Score - Agree ratio
2008 Scorecard
Score - Agree ratio
American Civil Liberties Union not avail. not avail.
American Conservative Union 0 - 0/25 not avail.
AFSCME not avail. not avail.
Americans for Democratic Action S - 14/20 50 - 10/20
Club for Growth not avail. not avail.
Drum Major Institute not avail. not avail.
Family Research Council not avail. not avail.
Information Technology Industry Council not avail. not avail.
League of Conservation Voters not avail. not avail.
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People not avail. not avail.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce 22 - 2/20 not avail.


Iraq War

Pelosi voted against the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 that started the Iraq War.[1]

For more information see the chart of U.S. House of Representatives votes on the Iraq War.

Indicates opposition to proposed "troop surge" in Iraq

Pelosi (D-Calif.) stated that she, along with Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), “informed the president that they were opposed to increasing troop levels.” Both Pelosi and Reid expressed their disapproval in a letter to Bush on January 5, 2007, several days before the Bush's speech announcing the "surge" but after its content was leaked to the public.

On January 7, 2006, less than one week after she officially became House Speaker, Pelosi stated, “We will not abandon them...But if the president wants to add to this mission, he is going to have to justify it. And this is new for him because up until now the Republican Congress has given him a blank check with no oversight, no standards, no conditions.”[2]

During the debate in mid-February 2007 of a nonbinding resolution opposing President Bush's troop "surge" in Iraq, Speaker Pelosi, who supported the measure, quoted former Ohio Sen. Robert Taft (R), who said, "Criticism in a time of war is essential to the maintenance of a democratic government" just weeks after the U.S. was bombed by Japanese forces at Pearl Harbor. The bill later passed on February 16 by a vote of 246-182. All but two Democrats, Reps. Gene Taylor (D-Miss.) and Jim Marshall (D-Ga.), voted in favor of the measure. Seventeen Republicans also supported it. Following the vote, Pelosi stated that the resolution would "signal a change in direction in Iraq that will end the fighting and bring our troops home."

Main article: Congressional actions regarding President Bush’s 2007 proposed troop “surge” in Iraq

Opposes creation of Iraq oversight committee

On January 22, 2007, the House Republican leadership sent a letter to Speaker Pelosi which proposed the creation of a new oversight committee to monitor the progress of President Bush's Iraq plan. The panel would have defined military, political and social benchmarks in which the president would be required to submit a report to the committee every 30 days indicating whether those benchmarks had been achieved. The committee would have also addressed troop withdrawal, which would have required “an interagency assessment on the impact withdrawal would have on our national security and homeland interest,” as well as the effect withdrawal would have had on surrounding countries.

During a press conference, Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) stated that he believed congressional oversight of Bush’s new Iraq plan, including the decision to deploy more than 20,000 troops to the region, was necessary. He explained that, “I support the president’s plan, but we have a duty to candidly and honestly assess whether the new strategy will be effective and ultimately successful.”

The proposal was ultimately rejected by Pelosi, as she expressed confidence in the oversight ability of the already established committees. Her spokesman, Drew Hammill, stated that, “Committees in the 110th Congress are already underway on Iraq oversight...She has the upmost confidence in their ability.”[3]

Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act

Pelosi strongly supported the Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act (H.R. 2956), which was sponsored by Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.) on July 10, 2007. The bill would require that the U.S. begin redeploying troops from Iraq within 120 days of the bill's passage. It would also require that the U.S. have a "limited presence" in Iraq by April 1, 2008. President Bush would need to submit a report to Congress outlining the specific goals of the remaining troops in Iraq, along with timetables for their completion. [4]

On July 12, 2007 the House passed the bill in a vote of 223-201.[5]

Before the vote, Pelosi called for a change in Iraq, saying,

“After more than 3,600 lives have been lost to a flawed strategy, we have a responsibility to create a new direction.
“After spending $329 million every day on the war in Iraq, on a war that is not making our country safer, we have an obligation to change course.
“After five years of a failed policy in Iraq, we have a duty not just to voice our opposition, but to vote to end the war.
“Chairman Skelton’s bipartisan bill offers a step we can take today toward bringing the troops home. To creating a strategic vision for stability in the Middle East, and for beginning to rearm our military."[6]
Main article: Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act#Criticisms and commendations

2007 Iraq war spending bill

On March 29, 2007, Speaker Pelosi urged President Bush to relax with threats of vetoing the House and Senate versions of the Iraq war supplemental bill. The legislation includes benchmarks and a 2008 withdrawal plan. If lawmakers cannot pass a bill with the president’s signature, it will lead to a shutdown of the Pentagon, effectively denying funding to troops in Iraq.[7]

After the first Iraq supplemental spending bill, which included a timetable for troop withdrawal, passed the House in a 218-212 vote in March 2007, Pelosi stated, "proudly, this new Congress voted to bring an end to the war in Iraq." The bill was eventually passed by both chambers and sent to the President who vetoed it as promised.

Main article: U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Health, and Iraq Accountability Act, 2007 (H.R.1591)

Following the veto, another attempt was made an an Iraq supplemental spending bill, one that would most likely not include a troop withdrawal timetable. On May 10, Pelosi agreed to also hold a vote on an alternative measure (H.R.2237), sponsored by Rep. James McGovern (D-Mass.), which would mandate that U.S. combat troop withdrawal begin within three months, and that it be completed six months after that. Then, the bill mandated, no congressional money could be used for military operations (though there would be an allowance for certain types of special-ops activities). The alternative measure failed by a vote of 171-255.

Main article: U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (H.R.2206)

On May 22, 2007, after numerous attempts at including timetables in an Iraq supplemental spending bill, Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate announced that they would each introduce supplemental spending bills which would not include timetables for combat withdrawal. Speaker Pelosi added, however, that the House bill would feature benchmarks with consequences, such as restricting reconstruction aid to Iraq if it could not meet certain goals. When the final bill, which provided funds for the Iraq War through September 2007, came to a vote, it passed 280-142, with most Democrats,including Pelosi, opposing it.

Main article: Congressional actions to end the Iraq War in the 110th Congress

Environmental record

For more information on environmental legislation, see the Energy and Environment Policy Portal

Transparency

Progressive image

Pelosi is generally very progressive. She was a member of the Progressive Caucus until she became the party leader, when she adopted a policy of not belonging to any caucuses.[8]

Like most House Democrats, Pelosi opposed the resolution authorizing Bush to use military force against Iraq. She has strongly criticized the war effort since then, and introduced an amendment to the FY 2006 Defense Appropriations bill calling on Bush to specify a strategy for success in Iraq, as well as a timetable for a safe withdrawal of American troops.

Also, on July 31, 2006 Pelosi joined Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) in leading top congressional Democrats in signing a letter urging President Bush to start withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2006. The letter was signed by the twelve leading Democrats on the House and Senate committees handling armed services, foreign relations, intelligence and military spending.[9]

In March of 2006 Pelosi received the Unsung Hero Award from the American Legion for opposing a Bush Administration policy that would "deduct any additions to disabled veterans' benefits from their military pensions."[10]

Despite receiving consistent criticism from left-leaning blogs Pelosi has been pushing her party to embrace new internet technologies, specifically blogs.[11]

Refusal to take part in event honoring Reps. Randy "Duke" Cunningham and Tom DeLay

On July 17, 2006, Roll Call reported that Pelosi was refusing to take part in a July 19 event hosted by the U.S. Capitol Historical Society. Thirty-seven departing members of Congress were to be honored, including former Reps. Tom DeLay (R-Texas) and Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-Calif.). Pelosi defended her decision by saying that the two men, "have 'dishonored the House' and 'are unfit to to be honored for their service.'" When informed of Pelosi’s objections to having Cunningham’s name mentioned during the event, Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) agreed, saying through a spokesman that, "it would be inappropriate to have a convicted felon on the honor roll." He did not indicate, however, that he agreed with regards to DeLay, who is awaiting a trial on conspiracy and money laundering charges.[12]

Network neutrality legislation

When Rep. Joe Barton and Sen. Ted Stevens pushed anti-Network neutrality legislation in 2006, Pelosi came out in favor of neutrality, angering telecom companies and some fellow Democrats by urging her caucus to fall in line behind her. Roll Call also quoted "insiders" as saying that the damage telecom companies deal to Democrats in retaliation was low because they had already maxed out their campaign contributions to the legal limits until after the 2006 election.[13]

PAC Fined

In 2004 a political action committee (PAC), Team Majority, controlled by Pelosi was fined $21,000 for "for improperly accepting donations over federal limits, according to records and interviews."[14] Pelosi used two PACs, including Team Majority, to raise money for her colleagues during the 2002 election. The fine came from Pelosi's use of multiple PACs to exceed donation limits to other members campaign committees. Two Democratic lawmakers, Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) and Julie Thomas (D-Md.), paid fines of $2,500 each for receiving illegal contributions from Pelosi's PAC. Team Majority ceased operating before the fine was issued.[15]

Earmarks and "pork"

In February of 2003 the San Francisco Chronicle reported that Pelosi had sought a $1 million earmark for an advisor and former campaign treasurer's think tank:[16]

Pelosi's office confirmed Thursday that the San Francisco Democrat, who was elected House minority leader in November, obtained the $1 million for the USF center, without requiring [her longtime adviser and campaign treasurer, former Lt. Gov. Leo T.] McCarthy and USF to go through the normal application process for such grants. But Pelosi said the program got the money on its merits, not because of any political ties to the congresswoman.[17]</blockquote>

A 2005 Washington Times report alleges that Pelosi helped a campaign donor secure funds from a federal agency days after one of her staff members returned from a fact-finding trip to Spain that was funded by the donor.[18]

Pelosi and her office denied any connection between the trip and the money sought by WestStart-CALSTART. Pelosi's spokeswoman stated that Republican staffers also went on the trip to Spain.

Endorsement of Jack Murtha for Majority Leader

Following their victory in the 2006 midterm elections, congressional Democrats engaged in an intra-party struggle to determine who would be majority leader during the 110th Congress. With Pelosi ascending to the Speakership, Rep. Steny Hoyer (Md.), then minority whip, appeared to be the most likely candidate for the position. Challenging him was Rep. John Murtha (Pa.), a close associate of Pelosi's and an early critic of the U.S. war in Iraq. Pelosi intially vowed to stay neutral in the contest. The Sunday before the Nov. 16th caucus elections, however, Pelosi surprised political observers by openly endorsing Murtha and throwing her full weight behind him, campaigning vigorously on his behalf. This move was criticized in many circles as dividing the party when it was enjoying its largest success in recent year. She also received criticism for backing Murtha for the number two position in what she had declared would be the cleanest Congress ever given his relation to a number of ethical scandals, particularly ABSCAM of the early 1980's. The campaign for the position became exceptionally heated, with Hoyer's supporters in particular accusing Murtha's camp of strong arm tactics. Hoyer ultimately prevailed by a vote of 149-86.[19][20]

Continued hostilities with Majority Leader Steny Hoyer

On February 12, 2007, hostilities between Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) heightened again after an aide in Pelosi's office said Hoyer had been "getting out in front" of a widespread consensus against allowing Republicans to introduce an alternative resolution on the Iraq war.[21]

Hoyer, on February 8, 2007, said to reporters that "Republicans would be allowed a motion to recommit or an amendment to the Democratic resolution." But then subsequently that day on the House floor, said it would be "unlikely that the GOP would get any such alternative."[22]

Hoyer's allies deny any split in leadership. However, the episode did suggest that tensions between Pelosi and Hoyer from prior disputes have not been dispelled. The most notable, although unsuccessful, seen in Pelosi's push for John Murtha (D-Pa.) as majority leader in December.[23]

National security and foreign policy

Against an invasion of Iran

In February 2007, at the House Democratic annual retreat, Speaker Pelosi informed her colleagues that "if it appears likely that Bush wants to take the country to war against Iran, the House would take up a bill to deny him the authority to do so."[24]

Trip to the Middle East

Despite vocal disapproval from the White House, Pelosi embarked on a nine-day goodwill trip to the Middle East in late March 2007. Pelosi planned to address several parliaments and heads of state, including Syria. Reps. Tom Lantos (D-Calif.), Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.), David Hobson (R-Ohio) and Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) are accompanying her. The trip to Syria goes against White House recommendations of avoiding the country due to, what the White House calls, State-sponsored terrorism. The White House criticized the message that Pelosi’s stop would send to U.S. allies.[25]

Think Progress, however, stated that at the time the White House was making those comments it exempted from criticism three congressional Republicans — Reps. Robert Aderholt (R-Ala.), Joe Pitts (R-Penn.) and Frank Wolf (R-Va.)[26] — who were then on a similar trip to Israel and Syria. Also, the Associated Press reported that in March 2007, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Ellen Sauerbrey had traveled to Syria to hold talks with a "senior Syrian diplomat on how Damascus was coping with a flood of Iraqi refugees, the first such talks in the Syrian capital for more than two years." [27]

White House spokesperson Dana Perino had the following exchange with a reporter on April 3, 2007, when asked about the difference between how the White House treated the two trips:

QUESTION: I want to clarify on the -- you're saying it was a bad idea, then, for Speaker Pelosi to go for all these various reasons to Syria. It's a bad idea, then, for Jim Baker to have gone, a bad idea for Frank Wolf to go as well, right?

MS. PERINO: We think that it is not a good idea for U.S. officials to go and meet with Assad, because it alleviates that pressure, and also because meetings haven't produced anything. They've been meeting just to meet, and he doesn't change his behavior. In fact, he uses those meetings as a reason to say that he doesn't need to do anything. [28]

Pelosi held talks with the Syrian president on April 4, 2007 on Syrian-Israeli relations and Syrian support of militant groups. [29]

A "day after the Pelosi delegation", on April 5, 2007, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), a Lebanese-American "who frequently travels to the Middle East"[30], "headed a 3 person delegation"[31][32] that visited Syria and met with Assad and Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem.[33][34]

On April 5, 2007, in a telephone interview with Rush Limbaugh[35], Vice President Dick Cheney criticized Pelosi's statements to the Syrian president as "nonsensical" and constituting "bad behavior." This criticism was, in part, a response to Pelosi conveying that Israel was open to peace talks with Syria which prompted Israel to clarify the pre-conditions to peace talks. [36]

On April 8, 2007, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich criticised Pelosi's trip as "dangerous for America", stating that it is "very important not to have two foreign policies." [37]

Views on Israel

Pelosi addressed the 2005 Policy Conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. In her speech she said that the root of the Israel-Palestine conflict is the right of Israel to exist, not the occupation of Palestine, and pledged the protection of the U.S.:

""There are those who contend that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is all about Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. This is absolute nonsense. In truth, the history of the conflict is not over occupation, and never has been: it is over the fundamental right of Israel to exist... The United States will stand with Israel now and forever. Now and forever."[2]

In July 2006, she threatened to boycott the speech by the Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Malaki to the joint session of congress unless he repudiated his earlier criticism of Israeli aggression against Lebanon.[38]

Beginning August 8, 1991, Nancy Pelosi went on a tour of Israel as part of an Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith congressional mission. The other congressmen on the tour were: Leon Panetta, George Miller and Charles Schumer.

Pelosi has strong ties to a number of Jewish groups, including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee whose former preident Amy Friedkin is her close friend.[39]

Applauds President Bush for tightening sanctions against Sudan

On May 29, 2007, Pelosi applauded a decision by President Bush to tighten sanctions against the government of Sudan. Bush's plan called for increasing economic and political pressure on Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir to end an ongoing genocide in the country's Darfur region. Pelosi stated “The president’s decision to impose tougher economic sanctions on Sudan was the right one...It has been three years since the Bush administration correctly termed the conditions in Darfur as ‘genocide’ and it is long past time for all countries concerned by the suffering that continues in Darfur to take the steps necessary to end it.”[40]

9/11 Commission recommendations

In January 2007, while attempting to pass legislation as part of the Democrat's "First 100 Hours" agenda regarding implementing the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, Speaker Pelosi, admitting to difficult passage in the Senate due to high costs, estimated that the costs for implementing inspections for 100 percent of air cargo alone would cost $3.6 to $6 billion annually.

Main article: Congressional efforts to implement recommendations of the 9/11 commission

No smoking in the Speaker's lobby

On January 10, 2007, Pelosi banned smoking from the Speaker's Lobby, saying, "The days of smoke-filled rooms in the United States Capitol are over...Medical science has unquestionably established the dangerous effects of secondhand smoke, including an increased risk of cancer and respiratory diseases. I am a firm believer that Congress should lead by example." Pelosi's ban did not prohibit lawmakers from smoking in their own offices.[41]

Congressional air travel

Flight compensation

In March 2007, a liaison from Speaker Pelosi met with Minority Leader John Boehner's (R-Ohio) office in order to amend the House rules regarding compensation for Congressional air travel. The rules were changed in January, requiring Congressmen to pay non-commercial aircraft owners the full price of a ticket, which the FAA rules prohibit. While this has prevented Members from using lobbyists aircraft, it also grounded several personal aircraft amongst Democratic and Republican Lawmakers. Pelosi was attempting to change the rules via voice-vote, (which required unanimous consent) but Boehner has refused to consider "piecemeal changes" and was holding out for other Rules changes regarding earmarks.

Eventually, on May 2 2007, the House voted by voice vote on H.R.363 to remove airplane travel restrictions. The measure was sponsored by Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) and Rep. Samuel Graves (R-Mo.). The new rules allow members to fly in a friend's airplane for free. The rules change also provides that members who are certified pilots may again fly their own aircraft.

Main article: U.S. federal ethics, transparency, and campaign finance legislation, 110th Congress

Use of Air Force transportation

In early February 2007, Department of Defense officials criticized Pelosi for using Air Force transportation in extravagance. Pelosi admitted to using a C-32 to fly coast to coast (from Washington to San Francisco) without refueling, but claims that she did not request the military version of a Boeing-757 specifically. Pelosi further claimed that the criticism was a retributive attack for her past criticism of Donald Rumsfeld and the war in Iraq. On February 8, 2007, White House spokesman Tony Snow called the affair "silly" and "unfair to the speaker."[42]

Immigration

On May 20th 2007, Speaker Pelosi issued a series of criticisms regarding the Senate's immigration bill. Specifically, she mentioned the 'point system' of the guest worker program and that it was anti-family. She stated, "the family unification principles which had been fundamental to American immigration are disrupted by what is in there now.”[43]

Main article: U.S. immigration legislation

Peru-United States Free Trade Agreement deal

On May 10, 2007, Democratic congressional leaders, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and House Committee on Ways and Means Chair Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), struck a deal with President Bush that secured their support for the Peru-U.S. agreement in exchange for inserting provisions that protect workers' rights to organize and bargain collectively. The Peruvian government would also have to agree to the changes before Congress could consider the agreement.[44]

Main article: Peru-United States Free Trade Agreement

Ethics reform

After emerging victorious in the November 7, 2006 elections Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi pledged "to lead the most honest, the most open and the most ethical Congress in history." Pelosi also pledged to sever the ties between K Street, the Washington corridor of lobbying firms, and Congress. As incoming Speaker, Pelosi also stated that she would push to make the sponsors of congressional earmarks public prior to votes. She stated, "There has to be transparency ... I'd just as soon do away with all (earmarks), but that probably isn't realistic."

Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2006

Minority Leader Pelosi introduced The Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2006 on January 20, 2006, in the wake of numerous guilty pleas by and indictments of lobbyists and members of Congress. Specifically, the bill would:

  • Ban lobbyists from giving gifts or travel to members or their staff.
  • Require lobbyists to file electronic, quarterly reports. The report must contain information pertaining to efforts to stimulate grassroots support, previous work in the executive or legislative branches, and provide certification of the report with the possibility of criminal penalties for failing to submit a certified report. The bill also creates a searchable public database of lobbying reports.
  • Double the "cooling-off" period where lawmakers, staff, and Executive branch employees cannot lobby there former offices of employment from one-year to two-years.
  • Stop efforts like the "K Street Project" by banning efforts of members of Congress and staff to enforce partisan discipline in private organizations. The penalty would be a fine or up to 15 years in prison with a possible ban on serving public office.
  • Require lawmakers, staff, and Executive employees to disclose outside job negotiations and to receive approval from the Office of Government Ethics.
  • Require conference committees to be open to the public and require conference reports to be publicly available on the Internet at least 24 hours prior to a vote.
  • Require that any appointee to a public safety position have proven credentials and training in one or more areas that are relevant.
  • Provide oversight of government contracting. Require contractors to work for contracts in an open, competitive bidding process. Create stiffer penalties for wartime fraud and prohibit contractors with conflicts of interest from participating in competitive bidding.

The bill was referred to six committees, Judiciary, Rules, Government Reform, Standards and Conduct, Armed Services, and Administration, and failed to emerge from any one of the six.

Independent ethics commission

On February 1, 2007, Speaker Pelosi and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) announced the creation of a "task force" to study implementation of an outside ethics body to oversee Congress. The task force, chaired by Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.), issued it's report to the House in May 2007.

On June 1, 2007, Pelosi announced her intention to create an independent ethics commission that would allow outside groups to file complaints against members of Congress, which previously could only be filed by other members. The commission, as proposed by a special task force chaired by Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.), could filter complaints but have no judging authority.[45] Implementation of the new commission was delayed, however, as many members were worried by the ability of non-members to submit complaints, fearing the change would be abused with politically motivated attacks. Fifty-three House members signed onto an alternative piece of ethics legislation, introduced by Rep. Baron Hill (D-Ind.), which would create a powerful investigative panel consisting of 12 former representatives, but would only allow complaints from sitting members. According to advocates familiar with the proposal in the House, the ethics panel would include the following components:

  • Republicans and Democrats would appoint an even number of members to the panel — most likely three GOP and three Democratic appointees. Current lawmakers and lobbyists could not sit on the panel.
  • The panel would receive complaints from outside groups and then invite witnesses to provide relevant testimony.
  • The panel would not have subpoena power or the power to put witnesses under oath.
  • Upon receiving a complaint, the panel would have 45 days to compile a report recommending dismissal or further action and pass it to the House Standards of Official Conduct Committee. If the panel could not complete its report within 45 days, it could grant itself a short extension.
  • The ethics committee would have up to 90 days to create an investigative subcommittee to probe the complaint or vote to dismiss it. If the committee voted to dismiss the complaint, the independent panel’s report would be made publicly available.

Several congressional watchdog groups came out against the measure, citing a provision that requires organizations that submit complaints to the independent ethics committee to disclose their donors, putting the legislation in danger of failing. Organizations like Public Citizen, Common Cause, Democracy 21, and the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, who had made the creation of such an outside ethics board a major priority since the Jack Abramoff scandal, felt that having to disclose their donors was not a necessary part of reform and could put them in jeopardy. Members of the House pushing for the outside ethics office argued that watchdog groups can't call for openness in Congress, while denying transparency on their part. The reform organizations also argued that the ethics panel as it was being considered in the House was not strong enough to produce real ethics reform, making calls to strengthen the potential committee's investigative authority and provide it with subpoena power.

Main article: Prospects for Ethics Reform in the 110th Congress

Election reform

On June 25, 2007, the House passed by voice vote the 'Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2007, sponsored by Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.). The bill, still pending passage in the Senate, would establish criminal penalties for acts of voter deception. Those who knowingly disseminate false information with the intention of keeping others from voting would face up to five years in prison under the legislation. Pelosi, who supported the measure, stated that the bill focused on "voter suppression tactics using misinformation and deception targeted at minority voters," and that "disenfranchising voters through deception about time, place, or eligibility for voting must be illegal."

Main article: Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2007

DC voting rights

After the Democrats took control of Congress in the 2006 elections, Pelosi expressed interest in pursuing congressional voting rights for the District of Columbia through the District of Columbia Fair and Equal Voting Rights Act of 2007. Previously, in 2006, Pelsoi endorsed an earlier version of the bill by Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) after it was clear that it would not call for the Utah state legislature to redraw its congressional districts as part of a compromise giving the state an additional House seat as well. Immediately following the 2006 elections, as speaker-elect, Pelosi said that she would seek to change House rules on the first day of the 110th Congress to temporarily allow the District's delegate (in this case Eleanor Holmes Norton) to vote on proposed changes, but not final approval of legislation on the floor. She also reaffirmed her support for the bill put forth by Davis and Norton in the 109th Congress.

Main article: District of Columbia Fair and Equal Voting Rights Act of 2007

Impeachment of President George W. Bush

In statements she made to the Washington Post in early 2006, then-House Minority Leader Pelosi left open the possibility that if Democrats took over the House after the November 2006 elections, their planned investigations into the Bush administration could lead to impeachment. Although impeachment would not be the goal of the investigations, she said, "You never know where it leads to."

In May 2006, the Washington Post reported that Pelosi was not interested in pursuing impeachment and had taken it "off the table." She reiterated this position throughout the 2006 campaign, noting on 60 Minutes that Republicans would "just love" the "waste of time" the proceedings would be. She added that "Making them lame ducks...is good enough for me."

After the Democrats won control of the House in November 2006, Speaker-elect Pelosi reinforced that any effort to impeach President Bush was "off the table."

Main article: Efforts to initiate the impeachment of President George W. Bush

Biography

Pelosi was born March 26, 1940 in Baltimore, Maryland. Her father, Thomas D'Alesandro, Jr., was a U.S. Congressman from Maryland and also a Mayor of Baltimore, the latter office having been held also by her brother Thomas L. J. D'Alesandro III in the late 1960s.

Pelosi attended Trinity College (now Trinity University) in Washington, DC. She married and moved to San Francisco where she became involved in Democratic politics, working her way up to becoming party chairwoman for Northern California. In 1984 she served as the head of the host committee for the Democratic National Convention that year. In 1986, the year before she was elected to Congress, Pelosi served as Finance Chair to the successful Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which helped the Democrats win back the Senate.

The Pelosi family has a net worth of over $25 million, mainly investments of husband Paul Pelosi. Besides a San Francisco Bay area large portfolio of jointly owned real estate, he also has millions of dollars worth of shares in publicly traded companies such as Microsoft, Amazon.com and AT&T.[46] The Pelosi family of San Francisco is politically well-connected. Her brother-in-law, Ron Pelosi, was a long-time member of the city's Board of Supervisors and a well-known personality on KQED, the city's educational television station. She has five children and six grandchildren.

Pelosi won in a special election to succeed Sala Burton and took office on June 2, 1987. She was elected to a full term in 1988 and has easily held the seat since. She has never faced a credible Republican opponent, which is not surprising since Republicans only make up 13 percent of registered voters in the district.

After the Tiananmen protests of 1989, Pelosi became a supporter of the Chinese democracy movement and vocal critic of the government of the People's Republic of China and sponsored the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992.

In 2001, she defeated Steny Hoyer to become the House Minority Whip, serving as second-in-command to Minority Leader Dick Gephardt of Missouri.

After the electoral defeat of 2002, Gephardt decided to run for President in 2004 and bowed out of his Minority Leader position. The leadership election pitted Pelosi against Marcy Kaptur of Ohio and Tennessee centrist Harold Ford, Jr. She stated in 2002, "We must draw clear distinctions between our vision of the future and the extreme policies put forward by the Republicans. We cannot allow Republicans to pretend they share our values and then legislate against those values without consequence."[47]

During the run-up to the 2002 mid-term elections Pelosi showcased what her leadership would look like by opposing Gephardt's decision to back President Bush's Iraq war resolution.[48]

After Kaptur dropped out of the race, Pelosi bested Ford in a 177-29 vote. By way of her victory Pelosi made history by becoming the first woman to lead a party in Congress.[49]

Pelosi has led the Democratic caucus on any number of issues. Despite losing many critical votes, she and her leadership team have been able to bring a unity to the Democratic caucus that hasn't existed for decades.[50] Congressional Quarterly examined over 600 roll call votes from 2005 where "a majority of Republicans voted against a majority of Democrats" and found that Democrats voted unanimously 82 times and on the party line 88 percent of the time. These are the highest numbers since CQ began keeping a tally of roll call votes in 1956.[51] She also worked hard to defeat the 2003 Medicare prescription drug bill, which passed the House after 16 Democrats joined the Republicans in voting "yes". She calls the Medicare vote her biggest disappointment.[52]

Pelosi has often allowed members of the Democratic caucus to showcase positions or pieces of legislation rather than keeping the media coverage for herself. Rep. John Spratt (D-S.C.) introduced a resolution challenging President Bush to come back to House and seek an authorization to use military force before invading Iraq, for example. Another example is that of John Murtha's call for a withdrawal from Iraq. Pelosi coordinated Murtha's call for withdrawal from behind the scenes while trying to appease the part of the party that opposed Murtha's plan.[53]

Speaker of the House

Following the Democratic victory in the 2006 midterm elections in which the party regained a majority in the House fro the first time since 1994, Pelosi became the consensus candidate to become Speaker of the House when the 110th Congress convened in January 2006. She was unanimously selected for the position by her peers on November 16, 2006, thus becoming the first woman ever elected Speaker of the House.[54]

2006 elections

In 2006, the Republicans nominated Michael A. Denunzio, and the Green Party nominated Krissy Keefer to face Pelosi in her November 2006 bid for reelection. (See U.S. congressional elections in 2006) Pelosi overwhelmingly won reelection, receiving 80% of the vote.[55][56]

2008 elections

Sdtp-banner.jpg
This information was gathered by volunteer researchers as part of the Superdelegate Transparency Project on the superdelegates for the 2008 Democratic presidential primary. For more info see the California superdelegate tracker or visit the STP homepage.

Before Hillary Clinton conceded the race, Nancy Pelosi, as a superdelegate, had pledged to support the primary winner (state or national).


"And, the speaker said again in an interview Friday that was aired today, the decisions of the party's "super-delegates" to the Democratic National Convention should "reflect" which candidate has claimed the most pledged delegates in a contest which she believes will end well before the convention in Denver."[57]


Money in Politics

This section contains links to – and feeds from – money in politics databases. For specific controversies, see this article's record and controversies section.

Campaign contributions

The following is drawn from government records of campaign contributions to Nancy Pelosi. Campaign contributions are one of the most direct conduits for influencing members of Congress. How to use this information.
File:Pelosi elections.jpg
Source: Federal Election Commission
<crpcontribdata>cid=N00007360&cycle=2006</crpcontribdata>
Links to more campaign contribution information for Nancy Pelosi
from the Center for Responsive Politics' OpenSecrets.org site.
Fundraising profile: 2008 election cycle Career totals
Top contributors by organization/corporation: 2008 election cycle Career totals
Top contributors by industry: 2008 election cycle Career totals

Revolving door

The "revolving door" refers to the passage of staffers between government and industry employment. Former staff for members of Congress often use the connections and knowledge they gained as public employees to help their new employers – often lobbying firms – influence their former employers and institutions.

Privately funded travel

The following is drawn from Nancy Pelosi's travel disclosure forms. Corporations and other organizations can pay for trips by members of Congress and their staff as long as it is related to official business (though some trips have been glorified junkets). How to use this information.

Personal finances

The following is drawn from Nancy Pelosi's personal financial disclosure forms. Close study of the data has often revealed conflicts of interest by members of Congress. How to use this information.

Committees and Affiliations

Committees

As the House Speaker, Pelosi does not belong to any committees.

Committee assignments in the 109th Congress (2005-2006)

Coalitions and Caucuses

  • Co Chair, Democratic National Platform Committee, 1992
  • Chair, Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, 1985
  • Co Chair, AIDS Task Force of the House Democratic Caucus
  • Co Chair, Biomedical Research Caucus
  • Chair, Congressional Working Group on China
  • Vice Chair, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee
  • Democratic Homeland Security Task Force
  • Democratic National Committee
  • Chair, Democratic Steering Committee
  • Vice Chair, Executive Committee, Democratic Study Group

Boards and other Affiliations

More Background Data

Contact

DC Office:
2371 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-0508
Phone: 202-225-4965
Fax: 202-225-8259
Email: sf.nancy AT mail.house.gov
Web Email
Website

District Office - San Francisco:
450 Golden Gate Avenue, 14th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3460
Phone: 415-556-4862
Fax: 415-861-1670

Twitter

Articles and resources

Related SourceWatch articles

Sources

  1. Roll call vote, Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002.
  2. "Pelosi: No blank check for troop surge," CNN. January 7, 2007.
  3. Jackie Kucinich. "House GOP proposes bipartisan Iraq oversight," The Hill. January 23, 2007.
  4. "OpenCongress page on H.R.2956," OpenCongress.
  5. Mike Soraghan and Manu Raju. "Key vote on the Iraq war keeps House GOP united," The Hill. July 13, 2007.
  6. "Pelosi Floor Statement on Responsible Redeployment from Iraq Act," Speaker Nancy Pelosi. July 12, 2007.
  7. Jonathan E. Kaplan. "Pelosi tells Bush to ‘calm down threats’," The Hill. March 28, 2007.
  8. Edward Epstein. "Liberal legislative caucus envisions post-Bush era," San Fransisco Chronicle. July 5, 2005.
  9. Charles Babington and Jim VandeHei. "Hill Democrats Unite to Urge Bush to Begin Iraq Pullout," Washington Post. August 1, 2006.
  10. Harold Meyerson. "How Nancy Pelosi Took Control," The American Prospect. May 12, 2004.
  11. [1] The Hill.
  12. John Bresnahan. "Pelosi Blasts Citations of DeLay, Cunningham," Roll Call. July 17, 2006.
  13. Tory Newmyer. "Push by Pelosi Irks Telecoms," Roll Call. May 10, 2006.
  14. "Pelosi PAC fined $21,000 by federal elections officials," USA Today. February 11, 2004.
  15. "Pelosi PAC fined $21,000 by federal elections officials," USA Today. February 11, 2004.
  16. Edward Epstein. "Pelosi accused of pork-barrel politics," San Fransisco Chronicle. February 21, 2003.
  17. Edward Epstein. "Pelosi accused of pork-barrel politics," San Fransisco Chronicle. February 21, 2003.
  18. "In Case You Missed It: Pelosi Helped Donor To PAC,"The Washington Times, (Accessed via GOP.com). April 5, 2005.
  19. Jonathan Weisman and Lois Romano. "Pelosi Splits Democrats With Push For Murtha," Washington Post. November 16, 2006.
  20. Jonathan Weisman and Lois Romano. "Democrats Pick Hoyer Over Murtha," Washington Post. November 17, 2007.
  21. Jonathan E. Kaplan. "Pelosi, Hoyer at odds again," The Hill. February 13, 2007.
  22. Jonathan E. Kaplan. "Pelosi, Hoyer at odds again," The Hill. February 13, 2007.
  23. Jonathan E. Kaplan. "Pelosi, Hoyer at odds again," The Hill. February 13, 2007.
  24. Michael Abramowitz and Paul Kane. "At Democrats' Meeting, Bush Appeals for Cooperation," Washington Post. February 4, 2007.
  25. Chris Good, "White House disapproves of Pelosi's Syria trip," The Hill, March 30, 2007.
  26. Helen Cooper and Carl Hulse, "As One Syria Trip Draws Fire, Others Draw Silence," New York Times, April 7, 2007
  27. "Exclusive: Republican Delegation Currently Visiting Syria, Spared From White House Attacks," Think Progress, March 30, 2007.
  28. Josh Marshall, blog post, TalkingPointsMemo.com, April 3, 2007.
  29. "Pelosi, Syrian president meet," USA Today, April 4, 2007.
  30. "Republican congressman meets with Syria's Assad," Associated Press, April 6, 2007
  31. "U.S. Congressmen meets with Syria's President Assad," PressTV.ir, April 5, 2007
  32. "Republican member of US Congress meets Syria's Assad," Yalibnan.com, April 6, 2007
  33. Carla Marinucci, "Pelosi, Lantos may be interested in diplomatic trip to Iran," San Franciso Chronicle, April 10, 2007
  34. "Republican Congressman Visits Syria After Controversial Pelosi Trip," Voice of America News, April 6, 2007
  35. Helen Cooper and Carl Hulse, "As One Syria Trip Draws Fire, Others Draw Silence," New York Times, April 7, 2007
  36. Mike Soraghan, "Cheney: Pelosi’s Syria visit constitutes ‘bad behavior’," The Hill, April 5, 2007.
  37. Chris Good, "Gingrich criticizes Pelosi over Syria visit," The Hill, April 8, 2007.
  38. "PACing in the Marionettes," The Fanonite. March 14, 2007.
  39. Jennifer Jacobson. "For Pelosi, Israel is personal," JTA. November 8, 2006.
  40. Kara Oppenheim, "Pelosi praises Bush for tightening Sudan sanctions," The Hill, May 29, 2007.
  41. Erica Werner. "Pelosi Bans Smoking Near House Floor," Washington Post. January 10, 2007.
  42. "House sergeant-at-arms ordered Pelosi plane," MSNBC. February 8, 2007.
  43. Jeremy Jacobs, "Pelosi lays out criticism of immigration bill" The Hill, May 20, 2007.
  44. Doug Palmer, "Democrats, Bush strike deal on trade," Reuters, May 11, 2007.
  45. Mike Soraghan, "Pelosi committed to allowing outside groups file ethics complaints," The Hill, June 1, 2007.
  46. Zachary Coile. "Bay lawmakers among wealthiest," San Fransisco Chronicle. June 26, 2004.
  47. Harold Meyerson. "How Nancy Pelosi Took Control," The American Prospect. May 12, 2004.
  48. Harold Meyerson. "How Nancy Pelosi Took Control," The American Prospect. May 12, 2004.
  49. Sean Loughlin. "Democrats pick Pelosi as House leader," CNN. November 15, 2002.
  50. Marc Sandalow, Erin McCormick. "Pelosi's goal: Democrats back on top," San Fransisco Chronicle. April 2, 2006.
  51. Marc Sandalow, Erin McCormick. "Pelosi's goal: Democrats back on top," San Fransisco Chronicle. April 2, 2006.
  52. Harold Meyerson. "How Nancy Pelosi Took Control," The American Prospect. May 12, 2004.
  53. Amy Sullivan. "Not as Lame as You Think," Washington Monthly. May 2006.
  54. Jonathan Weisman and Lois Romano. "Democrats Pick Hoyer Over Murtha," Washington Post. November 17, 2007.
  55. 2006 Congressional Races in California Center for Responsive Politics.
  56. 2006 Races in California CNN.
  57. Mark Silva, "Pelosi: Party should heed the will of the voters", The Swamp, presented by The Baltimore Sun, March 16, 2008

External resources

Pelosi's Websites

External articles

Local blogs and discussion sites


Semantic data (Edit data)

Toolbox

OpenCongress is a joint project of the Participatory Politics Foundation and the Sunlight Foundation. Questions? Comments? Contact Us