OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

In Historic Vote, Senate Gives Final Approval to Hate Crimes Protections for Gays

October 22, 2009 - by Donny Shaw

The Senate voted overwhelmingly on Thursday to expand federal hate crimes laws to include crimes motivated by a person’s actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or physical disability. The vote ends a decade-long push for supporters of the measure in Congress and ensures that it will become law soon.

The bill, commonly referred to as the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act, has been introduced in some form or another and voted on in every session of Congress since 1999. In 2007, it passed both the House and the Senate as an amendment to a Defense authorization bill only to be scrapped by Democratic leaders in Congress after President Bush threatened to veto the bill if it was included.

President Obama has long supported hate crimes protections for the LGBT community and is expected to sign the bill into law in the coming days.

The bill was sponsored this session of Congress by the late Sen. Ted Kennedy [D, MA]. In Kennedy’s absence, the version of the bill that was passed by the Senate, as an amendment to the 2010 Defense bill, was sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy [D, VT]. “Senator Kennedy provided steadfast leadership on this issue for more than a decade, and the Senate’s action today is a testament to his dedication to enacting hate crimes legislation,” Leahy said after the vote.

Though most states have their own hate crimes laws, federal law currently covers only crimes committed on the basis of a person’s race, color, religion or national origin, and only in cases where the crime was committed while the person was engaged in a federally protected activity, like voting or going to school. In addition to adding the new areas of protections at the federal level, the hate crimes legislation approved by the Senate today would remove the prerequisite that the crime was committed during a federally protected activity. The bill would allow the federal government to step in if the Justice Department determines that the state the crime was committed in is unwilling or unable to follow through with investigating a hate crime allegation.

The bill was approved by a vote of 68-29. All Democrats and Independent except Sen. Russell Feingold [D, WI] voted in favor. Feingold, who has voted “yes” in the past on versions of the legislation, voted “no” because, he said, the underlying Defense bill “does nothing to bring our open-ended and disproportionate military commitment in Afghanistan to an end and/or to ensure that our troops are safely and expeditiously redeployed from Iraq.”

Ten Republicans also voted in favor. They are Sen. Christopher Bond [R, MO], Sen. Susan Collins [R, ME], Sen. John Cornyn [R, TX], Sen. John Ensign [R, NV], Sen. Judd Gregg [R, NH], Sen. Kay Hutchison [R, TX], Sen. Richard Lugar [R, IN], Sen. John McCain [R, AZ], Sen. Olympia Snowe [R, ME] and Sen. George Voinovich [R, OH]. Interestingly, only five of them voted with Democrats just moments earlier on a motion to overcome a Republican-led filibuster of the bill. You can see the Republicans that sided with the Democrats on that vote by clicking here.

The Associated Press has a good article if you want to learn more about the defense provisions in the bill.

Read all blog posts here, or subscribe to our RSS feed to keep up with what’s really happening in Congress.

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.


  • Fishdood 10/23/2009 2:24am

    Everything that constitutes a hate crime was already illegal to do to ANYBODY. How is this an improvement? It certainly doesn’t do anything to prevent these types of crimes, and is itself discrimination.

    Pay special attention to this part: “The bill would allow the federal government to step in if the Justice Department determines that the state the crime was committed in is unwilling or unable to follow through with investigating a hate crime allegation.”

    This should be a huge red flag.

    This is just one more example of Big Brother forcing its will on to the states.

    C’mon Texas… Hurry up and get your fill of this oppressive government and lead the revolution. You are our best hope to save the American our forefathers worked so hard to create, and any real freedom.

    I realize most of the country is made up of sleeping drones, brainwashed simpletons, and indignant freeloaders, but there are a great many of us in other states who will gladly rush to fight by your side!

  • ssherices 10/24/2009 5:03am

    I agree with you! I am not against gays,black,whites,indians or anyone for that matter. I have lots of friends with different backgrounds. I dont think that I should be on guard if I say something a chinese person does not like and decides to turn me in. This is very scary! I feel like the government is targeting minorities in order to pass this. Of course it sounds good to those who fear being attacked for being gay or any other orientation. But I must point out its all good now until they are accused of being “racist” to Judy who is from Mexico. Think about how will they prove you tried to inflict harm to another. How will he said she said be found guilty? How will they determine this?

  • Anonymous 10/25/2009 5:00pm

    Once again the Congress has passed a bill in an decidedly underhanded manner by attaching a hate crime bill to a defense bill. The American people must call for the reconciliation of our Constitution and the U.S. Code. The Supreme Court has not fulfilled its obligation as a check in allowing the U.S. Code to trample the U.S. Constitution with un-Constitutional laws. When laws are passed absent the will of the people soon you have revolution.

Due to the archiving of this blog, comment posting has been disabled.