OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

Some Thoughts on the Summit

February 25, 2010 - by Donny Shaw

On the surface, today’s health care summit didn’t change much of anything. No bipartisan agreement on how to move forward was struck. Members of Congress didn’t put away their talking points in exchange for an honest discussion. And, despite the summit being broadcast live on television, it’s clear that behind-the-scenes, un-televised negotiations will to continue to take place.

But, on another level, there was something fresh and even historic about what happened today. The summit brought with it some big developments on how the public can (and should) be interacting with national policy issues.

One of the big developments was technological — having to do with the form of the summit. This began with the White House’s decisions to invite television cameras into the room and to also stream the entire summit live over their own website. But what they did that was truly innovative was to provide embed code along with the video on their website so that anyone could easily host the live video of the summit on their own website. Obviously, for online video, this is not really a development at all. It’s standard. But for government dissemination of content on such a big scale to not only not impede re-use, but actually encourage it, this is actually a big step forward for openness.

The White House’s decision to the offer embed code put people in charge of their own viewing experience. On a basic level, it eliminates the problem of the viewer having to subject themselves to the editorializing of a couple television channels in order to get the raw content. With the code spread all over the internet and hosted on millions of websites (details here), television networks that chose to have pundits inject their “take” on the discussion ended up losing out. As College News reported, complaints about networks that were interrupting the summit to add there own spin was trending on Twitter throughout the day.

More importantly, though, the embed code gave people the ability to make the basic viewing experience better and more effective for their needs and interests. For example, on OpenCongress, we hosted the video along with contextualizing links on all the bills and votes that were likely to come up during the summit. Sunlight Foundation built out a complex, live interface that allowed them to put the campaign contribution and vote data of each summit attendee right next to the video in turn as the each spoke. “We’re putting actual facts next to the rhetoric,” Sunlight’s Clay Johnson explained on Google Buzz. It’s a really neat idea, and people loved it. According to an email from Sunlight’s Executive Director, Ellen Miller, it was, by far, Sunlight’s biggest day of web traffic ever.

What we saw today with customizing the government information stream was just the tip of the iceberg of what’s possible. It was awesome to see and really helpful for viewing the summit in context, but, of course, in a few more years it will be remembered as primitive first step. That’s exciting.

The other thing that struck me was more about perception and what was actually said — the content of the summit. After more than a year of the entire country obsessively tracking health care reform, your average, medium-informed citizen is getting to be pretty darn wonky on the issue. It’s starting to feel like enough people now know enough about health care policy that the typical talking points and political posturing, from both Republicans and Democrats, just aren’t working.

The mainstream media tonight seems to be fixated on the McCain-Obama dust-up, but I don’t get the sense that that’s where the public’s attention actually was. The media just thinks that that is the moment that had the best “hook.” What stood out and what most people will remember, I think, were things like Rep. Paul Ryan [R, WI-1] talking Medicare policy and bending the cost curve, Sen. Tom Coburn [R, OK] on ending fraud and waste from the health care system, and the general back-and-forth on consumer pool size and the function of the individual mandate. At this point, the American people are educated enough on health care to know what things are real issues — what serious people would talk about at a serious summit on a serious issue.

Conversely, when Rep. Eric Cantor [R, VA-7] pulled out his props to make his point that he thinks the health care bill is too long, it felt like an insult to the viewers’ intelligence. As if we don’t know that there are more important things to talk about at a crucial summit like this than the number of pages in the bill.

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.


suzieqs 03/01/2010 1:00am

The Republicans have had an opportunity several times when they had control of congress, and what did we get? Medicare Part D, poorly written and no guidelines for management. When are any going to realize, that without comprehensive, overall reform of our health care system, and not just the insurance company costs?

fizzlesquirt 02/26/2010 11:13am

The republicans have offered several alternatives to this complete government takeover. Like starting with a smaller items such a s tort reform, buying insurance across state lines. The current plans from the democrats is more of an entitlement program that would end up bankrupting us just like medicaid.

stockpicker 02/26/2010 5:52am

I failed to see the Republicans offer anything but start over. They sure did object to ALL that went before. It is a lot easier to say we have a problem then to solve it. The solutions offered by the Republicans sounded like those interested in maintaining the status quo, wrote the script.

Clif9 02/25/2010 6:19pm

It was sleepy and the BO/JM “big confrontation” was nothing, I thought. Wouldn’t it be incredible if, through routinely having a camera there, viewers/voters started expecting those elected to actually be able to hold a reasoned debate and discuss things as one might in, oh say a business meeting of the kind that occur by the thousands every day! What a low state politics is in that civil conversation is considered big progress.

It’s demanding to be able to stay cool when all eyes are on you, and also get across your point of view intelligently. No wonder that BO was the one to get this going, he being Mr. Mellow. I can’t in my wildest dreams picture GWB wanting to be in this situation. But, if what happened today comes to be expected, it would be hard for future presidents to retreat to safety behind the face of a White House spokesperson.

LucasFoxx 02/25/2010 5:43pm

I was surprised at how civil it was. Still disappointing. Even Obama seemed resigned at the end. Now it’s up to Congressional Democrats alone. Compromise is still missing from the vocabulary of this class of Senate Republicans. I wouldn’t blame the majority for stripping out all of the minority’s amendments and compromises in the final resolution between House and Senate bills. They may as well put the better Public Option in. Under budget reconciliation, a lot of real reform will get left out. But that can be easily packaged together to form other bills that will give the minority the chance to threaten a filibuster and campaign against such things as ‘no pre-existing conditions’ and ‘rescissions,’ on their face. As for the code release to the public, I expect you’ll see more of that from the White House, not so much from congress. It’s too bad congress needs the President to help them do their business. He has his a whole branch of government of his own to worry about.

Due to the archiving of this blog, comment posting has been disabled.