H.Res.1403 - Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 4213) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend certain expiring provisions, and for other purposes.view all titles (1)
All Bill Titles
- Official: Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 4213) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend certain expiring provisions, and for other purposes. as introduced.
This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.
|May 28, 2010||Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.|
|May 28, 2010||On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 221 - 199 (Roll no. 323).|
|May 28, 2010||On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 235 - 182 (Roll no. 321).|
|May 28, 2010||Considered as unfinished business.|
|May 28, 2010||POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Res. 860, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question, and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Sessions demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of ordering the previous question until later in the legislative day.|
|May 28, 2010||DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1403.|
|May 28, 2010||Considered as privileged matter.|
|May 26, 2010||Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 200.|
|May 26, 2010||The resolution provides for the consideration of the Senate amendment to H. R. 4213, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend certain expiring provisions. The resolution makes in order a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Ways and Means or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment to H.R. 4213 with the amendment printed in part A of this report, modified by the amendment printed in part B. The resolution provides for one hour debate and the Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read.|
|May 26, 2010||The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-497, by Mr. Hastings (FL).|