close
114th Congress: We're updating with new data as it becomes available.

H.R.1837 - San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act

To address certain water-related concerns on the San Joaquin River, and for other purposes. view all titles (4)

All Bill Titles

  • Official: To address certain water-related concerns on the San Joaquin River, and for other purposes. as introduced.
  • Short: San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act as introduced.
  • Short: Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act as reported to house.
  • Short: Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act as passed house.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

All Actions
 
Feb 29, 2012The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Feb 29, 2012The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1837.
Feb 29, 2012UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
Feb 29, 2012The Chair announced that it understood that amendment No. 9 offered by Mr. Garamendi, made in order by the provisions of H.Res. 566, would not be offered.
Feb 29, 2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Markey amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Markey demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
Feb 29, 2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 566, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Markey amendment No. 8.
Feb 29, 2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Garamendi amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Garamendi demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
Feb 29, 2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 566, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Garamendi amendment No. 7.
Feb 29, 2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Napolitano amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Napolitano demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
Feb 29, 2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 566, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Napolitano amendment No. 6.

Vote on This Bill

20% Users Support Bill

2 in favor / 8 opposed
 

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC

Top-Rated Comments