H.R.3 - No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act

To prohibit taxpayer funded abortions and to provide for conscience protections, and for other purposes. view all titles (4)

All Bill Titles

  • Short: No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act as introduced.
  • Official: To prohibit taxpayer funded abortions and to provide for conscience protections, and for other purposes. as introduced.
  • Short: No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act as reported to house.
  • Short: No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act as passed house.

Comments Feed

Displaying 211-238 of 238 total comments.

AlphaFemale1968 05/06/2011 1:46am
in reply to kylher12 Jan 30, 2011 5:17pm

As a rape survivor who conceived a child as a result, I can state that you are offensive. Try walking in my shoes and then open your mouth. People like you disgust me.

fakk2 02/05/2011 7:04am
in reply to KEngel Feb 04, 2011 8:19am


Once again: “…since female on male rape does happen, if she got pregnant accidently, I wouldn’t want the FED paying for her to have an abortion…”

Since we’re talking about pregnancy and abortion, I think the fact that if a woman rapes a man and does get pregnant and does want an abortion, then it has everything to do with this bill. I don’t want her to get a tax deduction, or have the FED pay for it, or receive ANY assistance in any way that others who didn’t rape someone receive.

AlphaFemale1968 05/06/2011 2:18am
in reply to Mophatt Feb 01, 2011 5:39am

Mophatt- your can’t compare a stolen TV to the trauma of sexual assualt. Especially one that results in conception. Someone breaks into your house, you replace the locks, file a claim with the insurance company, buy a new TV, and feel uncomfortable for awhile. A sexual assault victim cannot do an of those things to eliminate the trauma. In most case when someone breaks in and steals your TV, you aren’t home. You aren’t physically, emotionally, menatlly and spiritually having your entire persona being stolen from you.
Someone breaks into your house, you can move. Someone sexually assaults you, you can never leave. Then to say that a woman MUST carry a child conceived as a result of a sexual assualt is inhuman, vile and evil.

WritingRider 05/06/2011 8:56pm
in reply to MichaelDSP Jan 28, 2011 12:50pm

They aren’t “Prying into women’s personal matters”. The GOP doesn’t want people’s hard earn money going towards paying for an abortion! I strongly agree with Mophatt!

AlphaFemale1968 05/06/2011 1:44am
in reply to ironman62292 Apr 20, 2011 9:17am

As a rape survivor who conceived a child as a result, I can state that you are an idiot!

Moderated Comment

AlphaFemale1968 05/06/2011 1:38am
in reply to bdg333 Apr 09, 2011 1:17pm

What the F does planned parenthood ahve to do with this? Wow, you are reaching!

kindrapring 05/18/2011 4:28pm
in reply to fakk2 Jan 28, 2011 4:13pm

Except the bill also imposed penalties against individual companies and small businesses and redefines the definition of rape to a degree.

kindrapring 05/18/2011 4:35pm
in reply to mmstahlecker Feb 03, 2011 6:51am

You mean the so-called “illegal activity” that not a single major news network seems to cover? Or the illegal activity that lying Christian groups make up or twist to make Planned Parenthood look evil out of a misguided sense of self-righteousness?

kindrapring 05/18/2011 4:43pm
in reply to Constitutionist Feb 16, 2011 2:42pm

Too made none of those abortion pictures depict common abortions – otherwise you would find a lot more than the same 10 that float around. Those all depict late trimester, probably back-alley style abortions, if they’re real at all (a lot of them are 100% fake). They’re fabricated by pro-life nutjobs to try and scare you into thinking it’s this horrible thing because they know they have no LOGIC to back themselves up.


AlphaFemale1968 05/06/2011 1:50am
in reply to alison212 Feb 01, 2011 11:27am

And as a rape victim, did you conceive a child? I did? You have no idea what it is like to be told you are pregnant as a result of a sexual assault. To insinuate that FORCING a rape victim to carry an unintended pregnancy would be good for her… Take your ass back to church and ask your God to forgive for that one. You disgust me.

kindrapring 05/18/2011 4:24pm
in reply to bdg333 Apr 09, 2011 1:36pm

First off, the government isn’t forcing anyone to have an abortion whereas the pro-lifers want to remove the choice altogether.

Second, abstinence only is absolutely still being taught.

Third, abstinence is not the ultimate protection against pregnancy. That’s akin to saying “if you never drive, then you can never get into a car accident”. Sex is necessary to an intimate relationship. Telling people “NO YOU CAN’T HAVE SEX” is just ultra-religious nonsense.

Fourth, it astounds me how illogical this is to begin with. You want to not allow people to have abortions then complain about welfare – even though if more woman GOT abortions we would have FEWER PEOPLE ON WELFARE. It’s also astounding how you talk about the “right to life” but that “right to life” seems to be limited to the right to breath – after that you don’t seem to care and don’t want to give people support to actually live life.

bdg333 04/09/2011 1:36pm
in reply to navigation74 Mar 22, 2011 7:07am

the free market already created an 100% effective birth control (excluding rape) and that is called the zipper.

Also, we have naver had an abstinence only education. There are barely any school teach solely abstinance-only educations in relationship to otherwise.

People have jobs, they can’t always work at places that offers contraceptives.

Also, if we are pro-life, why would we even allow the government to force women to have abortions?! We would be the first ones protesting! What we want is a for the government to recognized the civil right to life for those who are yet to be born, which would ensure the government would not be able to force women to have abortions. people were not forced to have slaves once it was no longer legal.

navigation74 05/06/2011 4:13pm
in reply to bdg333 Apr 09, 2011 1:50pm

Murder and sex are apples and oranges, but thanks for playing.

Also, slavery is different from someone’s sex life.

Do you really not think critically enough to understand that a woman making a medical decision for herself is completely different from murdering a sentient human being? Do you really not see the similarities in making women slaves to their biology?

ks924 06/07/2011 8:25pm
in reply to lclark61201 Feb 03, 2011 1:43pm

Considering that only liberals, degenerates and otherwise white trash are getting abortions (which I’m all for given that I don’t want filth reproducing to begin with), why the fuck am I still expected to pay for this?

universou 03/03/2012 12:53pm
in reply to ks924 Jun 07, 2011 8:26pm

Hey punk ass jerk. Why is it that the wackos that claim to be fighting for life and GOD are always the first ones to attack? Killing doctors, persecuting women and condemning everyone to hell. Your actions are why so many people are leaving the church, not to mention all the sexual abuse our children have had to go through. History will show your primitive ideology as exactly that, primitive.

TheConservative 02/02/2011 3:07pm
in reply to prbroste Feb 02, 2011 12:32pm

I would also like to comment on your example of a human tumor. It is important to realize that a tumor is a mutation of human cells. Any mutation results in a LOSE of genetic information. Compare this with a human fetus, or with you and I: living collections of human cells that are capable of GROWING and producing new, BENEFICIAL cells.

A tumor is a destructive item that has lost some of its genetic code. A fetus is a little baby who hasn’t been born yet and is growing inside a mother’s womb. I see no correlation.

ks924 06/07/2011 8:26pm
in reply to AlphaFemale1968 May 06, 2011 1:50am

Is alphafemale another way to spell dyke/degenerate?

LordHornswoggle 08/03/2011 4:14pm

I find abortion reprehensible. That being said, I am firmly pro-choice. The person/people involved made a conscious decision (sans rape or forced conception) to procreate and should deal with the “problem” they made themselves. If having an abortion is morally wrong, from a religious standpoint, then their god/gods will judge them in the end. But I do not feel myself or any other citizen of the US should pay for any others “mistake”. Let them pay for it themselves, or be responsible and raise their child(ren).

inghammoms 03/10/2012 3:14pm
in reply to prbroste Feb 02, 2011 12:51am

You are so full of crap – just regurgitating the Democrat “war on women” propaganda. I’ve read the bill. It does not redefine rape. It allows raped women to have their abortions covered. The only references to rape are in section 308 & 201 . If you have too much trouble reading, just search “rape” or “force” – http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr3eh/pdf/BILLS-112hr3eh.pdf (Sorry, I just can’t stand political rhetoric and how it makes people crazy with stoopid – and politicians rich.)

bdg333 04/09/2011 1:50pm
in reply to navigation74 Mar 22, 2011 7:17am

“Forcing someone to live by your morality isn’t going to work either” Under that arguement, since I believe murder is immoral, it should be perfectly legal! Also, isn’t the constitution itself a document that imposes it’s morality on others by preventing them to use the government how they please or giving the government the power to stop horrible acts that are viewed as immoral by many?

Also, the Republicans first started because they wanted to ‘impose their morality on others’ in regards to slavery. Was that wrong too for them to impose their morals on others?

crjr3c0n 03/03/2011 4:21am

this is wrong what if you get it stuck in bum and you dident want it

kir 02/12/2011 2:41pm
in reply to RavenWytch Feb 10, 2011 6:43am

Have you read this bill at all? This bill doesn’t say a SINGLE thing about what a woman can or can’t do. It just says what will and won’t be funded by federal tax dollars. That’s all.

Vanessa4theunborn 11/26/2011 4:31am

98% of abortions are done on perfectly healthy babies and mothers. Most of these are coerced by others and not necessarily the choice of the mother. Less than 1% are due to rape or incest, and even then, this violent crimen goes unpunished becuase the only evidence, the child, is gotten rid of.

If I dont have a say when my money is being spent on abortion then I shouldnt have to pay.

phorv2 07/28/2012 4:03am

If a woman has committed to the decision to get an abortion she should be able to. If a doctor decides to set up a clinic to perform abortions and has the finances to set one up he/she has that right. However, taxpayer dollars should not fund her abortion nor should taxpayer dollars support the clinic. If the abortion clinic can survive in the marketplace. In that way it becomes a more local issue, one between the woman and her family and the doctor rather than the whole nation.

Spam Comment

bdg333 04/09/2011 1:17pm
in reply to suzieqs Apr 06, 2011 9:42am

If you are dying, or are in pain, why would you go to planned parenthood?

Moderated Comment

Vote on This Bill

34% Users Support Bill

728 in favor / 1410 opposed

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC

Top-Rated Comments