H.R.3261 - Stop Online Piracy Act

To promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes. view all titles (7)

All Bill Titles

  • Popular: SOPA as .
  • Popular: Stop Online Piracy Act as introduced.
  • Short: Stop Online Piracy Act as introduced.
  • Official: To promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes. as introduced.
  • Popular: Enforcing and Protecting American Rights Against Sites Intent on Theft and Exploitation Act as introduced.
  • Popular: E-PARASITE Act as introduced.
  • Popular: SOPA.

This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.

Comments Feed

Displaying 271-300 of 495 total comments.

  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 12/28/2011 8:22pm

    Yeah right…

    What about this part?


    Wouldn’t some just love that is all privacy software was made illegal…

  • GamerLEN 12/28/2011 2:45am


  • GamerLEN 12/28/2011 7:44am


  • Comm_reply
    GamerLEN 12/28/2011 7:47am

    Whoops, missed one. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/12/sopa-faces-growing-opposition-among-conservatives.ars?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss

  • CurtisNeeley 12/28/2011 9:55am

    SOPA does NOTHING but make it easier to ENFORCE EXISTING LAW and gives the DOJ another tool to enforce laws.

    The Supreme Court Justice who called internet wire communications the, unique and wholly new medium of worldwide human communication ,was twenty-five when the first WMD was used to terrorize Japan into surrendering in WWII. The United States did NOT enter WWII to stop Hitler from exterminating Jews but to punish Japan for bombing Pearl Harbor.

    Internet wire communications are nothing more than the logical progression of 47 USC §153 ¶(52) communications by wire and not the unique and wholly new medium of worldwide human communication called in OBVIOUS error by a Justice who was 77 and past the age for retiring and drawing Social Security at the time.


    No judge grew up with internet wire communications!

  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 12/28/2011 8:23pm

    You TOO.

    Yeah right…

    What about this part?


    Wouldn’t some just love that is all privacy software was made illegal…

  • ToBeContinued 12/28/2011 2:44pm

    Dear Congress

    You hate to know all the details of this bill BEFORE voting for it.
    Here are some facts for you…


  • WasMiddleClass 12/28/2011 8:51pm

    @SOPA is not an infringement against anything, and these internet kids need to stop bringing up the First Amendment.

    Well thank you for that compliment. I still remember playing Gunship on my C64… when I was somewhere around 30.


    This part could take away any privacy available to anyone in America.

    “knowingly and willfully provides or offers to provide a product or service designed or marketed by such entity…for the circumvention or bypassing of a Justice Department-erected blockade.”

    Now I assume most of us know we are walking on the entire planet while we are online, and there are many predators out there, both official and unofficial, that don’t have our best intentions at heart. And most know your standard browser and web connection track and record every step you make, for eternity.

  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 12/28/2011 8:53pm

    I’m not going to state what the Constitution says here, but how would everyone feel if a law was passed that said you could only have glass walls in your house now so you can be watched, and you had to carry a camera that transmitted everywhere you went and what you did with you at all times?

    Without software that is capable of bypassing that DOJ “blockade” also that is what you will be forced to live with.

    And did you ever wonder why government cant just go arrest those supposed criminals instead of trying to block us from accessing them???????

  • WasMiddleClass 12/28/2011 9:34pm

    This whole thing reminds my way too much of why some say we need more laws to restrict legal gun ownership to prevent crimes by criminals that already cant legally own a gun in the first place.

    The same old song they sing about how we need more laws to restrict law abiding peoples rights so they can stop the criminals from doing things that are already illegal by existing laws…

  • WasMiddleClass 12/28/2011 10:15pm

    One last thought for the day.

    All the privacy software I am running right now can bypass the Great Firewall Of China with no problem, totally illegal to them.

    So now we are going to make that illegal here in the name of so called safety?

    “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety”

    Benjamin Franklin

  • Comm_reply
    CurtisNeeley 12/29/2011 12:19pm

    “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety”

    Benjamin Franklin gave us this worthless but neat-sounding drivel long before setting any of the slaves free this Founding-Father owned. NOT the life qualities ideal for an authority to cite regarding liberties? Mr Franklin granted his slaves liberty before death on April 17, 1790. Oddly enough, Benjamin Franklin died ONE month and 13 days before the initial copy[rite] FRAUD passed on May 31, 1790

    Internet wire communications will be AS REGULATED AS TELEVISION when my Federal Court case(s) resolve(s).

    SOPA is not the ideal way to end copy[rite] violation by wire. Making copy[rite] violation by wire a crime with MANDATORY prison time, – period.

    Copy[rite] in the USA must be rewritten with the international Berne Convention personal copy rights entirely removed from the existing USA corporate copy ritual.


  • Comm_reply
    CurtisNeeley 12/29/2011 12:54pm

    I believe unregulated internet wire communications have been illegal since begun. There is no option besides enforcing laws already passed.

    SOPA makes absolutely no difference after existing but ignored laws are required to be followed. I wrote wire communication software BEFORE Google existed. Ten years ago it was archived.

    I am severely brain damaged but can write and deploy a Google Inc search interface today. I suspect most “programers” can too. My reservation software, see archived above, was so much above search engines in complexity.

    Unregulated internet wire communications have been illegal since begun. No option remains besides enforcing laws already passed.

    47 USC §151

  • Comm_reply
    CurtisNeeley 12/29/2011 12:57pm

    “For the purpose of regulating interstate and foreign commerce in communication by wire so as to make available, so far as possible, to all the people of the United States, without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex, a rapid, efficient, Nation-wide, and world-wide wire communication service with adequate facilities at reasonable charges, for the purpose of the national defense, for the purpose of promoting safety of life and property through the use of wire communications, and for the purpose of securing a more effective execution of this policy by centralizing authority heretofore granted by law to several agencies and by granting additional authority with respect to interstate and foreign commerce in wire communication, there is created a commission to be known as the “Federal Communications Commission”, which shall be constituted as hereinafter provided, and which shall execute and enforce the provisions of this chapter.

  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 12/29/2011 10:07pm


    I watched a news story a while back about a guy talking to his friend on the phone about a mock terrorist attack planned to train first responders in his town. It seems his words caught SkyNets attention and some men in black showed up at his door to question him about his conversation that contained key words their bots caught.

    How much more regulation do you want?

  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 12/29/2011 10:12pm

    Attacking Ben Franklin now? Geeze…

    I bet you can find a problem with all the founders too…

    How about Thomas Paine? That could get interesting…

  • Comm_reply
    GamerLEN 01/02/2012 12:16pm

    You do realize nobody is paying attention to you anymore right?

  • Comm_reply
    CurtisNeeley 01/02/2012 7:24pm

    “You do realize nobody is paying attention to you anymore right?”

    Did they EVER pay attention? Online and offline pornography will soon require authenticated adult viewership and that viewership dates/times be stored local to the computer used to display adult art.

    Did you catch the online and offline part of the above? It is already technically trivial and has been trivial for twenty years or more.

    Michael Henri Page Esq misled the Western District of Arkansas Magistrate Judge Honorable Erin L Setser and described the Google Inc search engine as, “For one thing, search is completely automated. It goes out, it crawls the web, it sees what’s there, and it reports it back. The machine has no way of knowing whether a picture is nude…”, as is totally incorrect and malicious. See Dkt 216 pp(71-75) and read the fairytale told by Google Inc in open Court.

  • WasMiddleClass 12/28/2011 10:19pm

    “Justice Department-erected blockade”—-“Great Firewall Of China”


  • GamerLEN 12/29/2011 6:15am

    Ooooo~ Here’s something fun! :D


  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 12/29/2011 10:14pm

    I figured you would find that one :)

  • walker7 12/29/2011 7:25am

    Here’s another article:


  • GamerLEN 12/29/2011 1:29pm


    Another one for the Anti-SOPA side.

    Also… Three cheers for irony. :P


  • WasMiddleClass 12/29/2011 10:30pm

    Just be careful about believing who REALLY opposes this now…

    More stuff out there than I even have time to read on this bill…


    I found that on the the twitter feed for one of the security/privacy communities founders.

  • Comm_reply
    GamerLEN 12/30/2011 2:52am

    Not anymore. Looks like they lost a lot of business today and it scared ’em good.


  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 12/30/2011 11:22pm

    Too little too late I think. I would NEVER buy a domain from them now.

    The internet (people) fight back!

  • CurtisNeeley 12/30/2011 6:40am

    Internet wire communications will be AS REGULATED AS TELEVISION when my Federal Court case(s) resolve(s).


    This comment thread has become too domainer and become useless.

    How does one find a website when uses of even “snippits” by GOOG et al requires a license fee like it will SOON?

    Why won’t GOOG et al follow the robot.txt protocol on my website?

    jpg site:curtisneeley.com GOOG MSFT

  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 12/30/2011 11:13pm

    So people will have to back to buying Penthouse?

    Who regulated that stuff? Did parents have a safe in their house back then?

    And it sucks Google is the only search engine…

  • Comm_reply
    WasMiddleClass 12/30/2011 11:14pm

    ooops…Dragon left out the go in that.

  • Comm_reply
    CurtisNeeley 12/31/2011 1:29am

    Yes, offline AND online pornography or nude photos will benefit greatly when the FCC regulates wire communications. Pornography and nude photos will be controlled in homes just as alcohol, cigarettes, and firearms are controlled currently.

    Accesses by IPs to adult material will be required recorded on the accessing computer as well as the site visited… PERIOD!
    The porn-filled “open internet” WILL SOON NO LONGER EXIST.

    Google Inc has faced me in United States District Court for over three-years and have no possibility of winning and keeping porn-by-wire flowing.

    I will not settle regardless of financial offers and this is now obvious. I have sought to add Microsoft Corporation and the FCC. There is no doubt in my mind that they will all face me before the Supreme Court eventually. I already know the end results of my case(s) but not how negatively search engines will be impacted or if they will survive.

    SOPA and United States copy[rite] law are BOTH corporate hoaxes.

Vote on This Bill

1% Users Support Bill

32 in favor / 3129 opposed

Send Your Rep a Letter

about this bill Support Oppose Tracking
Track with MyOC

Top-Rated Comments