114th Congress: We're updating with new data as it becomes available.

Contact Congress

This letter was sent by OpenCongress user gaborcselle on November 16, 2011 in opposition to S.968 PIPA.
A public message by gaborcselle

Comment on this letter below

S.968 PROTECT IP Act of 2011

Dear Senators Boxer and Feinstein,

I am writing you in opposition to S.968 - PROTECT IP Act of 2011. I'm concerned with this bill not just on Free Speech grounds, but also because I think it endangers the technical operation of the Internet and the long-term economic interests of the United States.

1. The PROTECT IP bill would introduce a mechanism for the Department of Justice to block websites that could be used for censorship rather than copyright protection and thus violates the spirit of the first amendment First Amendment.

2. The Internet's DNS system works because all DNS servers have the same domain name to IP address mappings. Introducing a way to selectively delete or disable mappings can cause even legitimate sites to become inaccessible. Also, blocking DNS entries won't help against users accessing servers directly via their IP address, making this law easy to circumvent.

3. The industries protected by this bill - the music recording and film industries - are shrinking, but the Internet industry is growing. Sites that offer pirated content will always exist, and this bill won't stop them. The Internet industry is already offering new ways for content producers to monetize their products: Think iTunes, Netflix, Amazon Video, and many more. These services are the future and we should let them grow, not choke them with legislation like the PROTECT IP act.

I urge you to oppose this act. Thanks for your time.

Sincerely, Gabor Cselle

This letter was a reply from the office of Barbara Boxer on November 28, 2011.
Responding to Your Message

Dear Mr. Cselle:

Thank you for taking the time to write and share your views with me.  Your comments will help me continue to represent you and other Californians to the best of my ability.  Be assured that I will keep your views in mind as the Senate considers legislation on this or similar issues.

 If you would like additional information about my work in the U.S. Senate, I invite you to visit my website,  From this site, you can access my statements and press releases about current events and pending legislation, request copies of legislation and government reports, and receive detailed information about the many services that I am privileged to provide for my constituents.  You may also wish to visit to track current and past federal legislation.

Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts with me.  I appreciate hearing from you.


Barbara Boxer

United States Senator

Please do not respond to this message. If you would like to comment on legislation, please visit my website and use the correspondence form at

Note to Congressional staff & elected officials reading this: this letter was sent through Contact-Congress features on, a free public resource website, but in the future we seek to compel the U.S. Congress to adopt fully open technology for constituent communications. For more information how your office can better handle public feedback through an open API and open standards, contact us -- even today, there are significantly more efficient and responsive ways for our elected officials to receive email feedback than the status quo of individual webforms. For greater public accountability in government, we must make the process of writing one's members of Congress more accessible and empowering. Looking ahead, we will release more data from Contact-Congress letters and Congressional response rates back into the public commons. This will result in a new open data source on bills & issues people care about, as well as encourage best practices in constituent communications and make it possible to grade members of Congress on their responsiveness & citizen satisfaction.